People should check out Safecast, which is a citizen-led open data network for monitoring and publishing radiation readings, including an open API: https://blog.safecast.org/ They're using low-cost open hardware, including Arduino: https://github.com/Safecast/General/wiki/Safecast-Devices Here's their latest heatmap (well, radiation map) for Japan, centered on the Fukushima area: https://safecast.org/tilemap/?y=37.14…
Do you know how they're communicating the expected health effects of dose rates like these? For instance the yellow is 4 uSv/hr, roughly 10x a normal dose rate in the USA.
First contact made with melted nuclear fuel at Fukushima plant
221–222 of 222 posts
Re: First contact made with melted nuclear fuel at Fukushima plant
#222Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Experience builds up rapidly as the same damned thing is built and installed over and over. Nuclear doesn't have that. Do you think this is the reason the US Navy doesn’t seem to have major problems getting nuclear power plants built and installed in submarines and aircraft carriers? It’s interesting how civilian power companies have had a bunch of high profile failures in this area but as far as I can tell new war…
What's the power output of those I imagine much smaller reactors, compared to ones meant to power entire regions and millions of consumers? What did they cost to build? What risks are there, compared to regular reactors?
The A1B being installed on the newest carriers is a 700 MW unit being installed in a pair, so 1.4 GW total. That number seems comparable to a lot of commercial power generation, e.g. Vermont Yankee is a 620 MW plant.