Live data from Hacker News

Google May Have to Get Used to Third Place in the Cloud

bloomberg.com

221–230 of 295 posts

Re: Google May Have to Get Used to Third Place in the Cloud

#221
post #218

From product perspective, Google cloud is far ahead from AWS and Azure. As one who runs a company that operates on all 3, serving over 3b+ HTTPS requests daily, across 250K of web apps, in all continents, I can say clear and simple: GCP Compute, Networking stack and storage are a superior product when compared to AWS and Azure. For every dollar you pay: - You get more compute power per core, while paying less. - You…

Didn't they suffer a global outage just the other day?

Re: Google May Have to Get Used to Third Place in the Cloud

#222
post #112
post #8

Microsoft will reap the rewards of supporting XP and Office for decades, that wins enterprise trust & goodwill, and clients will expect that from Azure. On the other hand, every month we have a new product/service of Google being deprecated (officially or by raising prices). Even if it's technically better, the most sane business decision from enterprise would be to bet on Microsoft for support reasons. Microsoft tal…

Don’t forget the rapid and severe Google maps price increases. These are the gift that will keep on giving for Microsoft and Amazon in the mindshare of developers and business leaders. Incredibly stupid move.

Am not too well-read on this - what are some good AWS/MS alternatives to Google Maps?

Re: Google May Have to Get Used to Third Place in the Cloud

#223
post #121
post #95

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I remember seeing Google folks in Japan coming to sell their products in T shirts and jeans in a business world where everyone wears suits and knows it. I have nothing against the casual style, but knowing the etiquette is primordial in business.

Dawut? For real? I honestly cannot imagine the words ‘sales’ and ‘no suit’ together in a sentence anywhere in the world, much less Japan. I’m not even Japanese and I think by now I’d consider it more or less an insult.

In the Nordics few salespeople wear suit (especially in tech)

Re: Google May Have to Get Used to Third Place in the Cloud

#224

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Well, sure it was bleeding edge. That's not the point. Bleeding edge doesn't mean that your support has to be completely broken like this.

I wouldn’t call that “completely broken”. You can argue it took too long, or that having to give that advice for the reason given is stupid, or that the customer didn’t want to get that advice, but in the example the customer managed to get through to customer support and got clear, actionable advice. I frequently read worse on HN about Google, where even reaching tech support can be ‘challenging”, and Apple, where a…

Sure, "close your account" is actionable, but it's funny to think that it's not a clear sign that their customer support is completely broken. I mean, when you inform a company of a problem and their customer support admits that it's a bug on the company's side, but they can't fix it because they don't have any way to inform the developers from the company in question, how is that not being broken? Customer support should be a filter to the developers, but instead they're a fake door. Despite being a 3rd party, the customer support represents the company. From the customer's side, the company apparently can't communicate with itself. That's completely broken in my book.

> I frequently read worse on HN

Right, that's why it's funny. The bar is very low here, and that's why you can count it as not being completely broken.

Re: Google May Have to Get Used to Third Place in the Cloud

#225
Honestly , they deserve that place.

While I’m a huge G cloud fan , there is too many things that frustrate me with GCloud.

Whether it’s Firebase that doesn’t have a way to limit user bandwidth or Google Staff taking you for a dummy because the guy is a « Google Engineer » or the performance of European Datacenter... there is a just countless stuff that makes GCloud overall an « okay » experience but nowhere similar to what AWS or’Azure offers

Re: Google May Have to Get Used to Third Place in the Cloud

#226
post #170

Earlier quoted context omitted.

We're a pretty small fish as Google Cloud clients go, but we have honestly not had this problem at all. We get very fast response to support tickets, and on the rare occasions where we've had to escalate they have gone as far as setting up hangouts with senior engineers.

Google, for all their faults, does seem much more interested in soliciting product feedback. I've never been able to figure out how MS does that, as everything seems to run through an omnipresent offshored L1 support contract. (Aka the "Here's a link to the documentation!" folks)

(GCP employee)

Yes, totally. When I transferred to work on GCP, I was pleasantly surprised at how much eng/product cares about users/developers wants, needs, and feedback.

Re: Google May Have to Get Used to Third Place in the Cloud

#227
post #141

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I’m not sure what you are angling at here. The China regions might not have all the AWS services present, and they have some extra restrictions, but they aren’t some kind of clones of AWS software. Unless I’m missing something, they are the same versions of what runs in the other regions.

You can't go into the AWS console and select a region in China and then provision resources. AWS-China is literally a different organization with a different service on a different URI and with whom you'll need to establish a different contractual relationship.

It's a different 'partition' the same way that govcloud is a different partition. Separate for legal reasons, but the same technology underneath.

Re: Google May Have to Get Used to Third Place in the Cloud

#228
post #112
post #8

Microsoft will reap the rewards of supporting XP and Office for decades, that wins enterprise trust & goodwill, and clients will expect that from Azure. On the other hand, every month we have a new product/service of Google being deprecated (officially or by raising prices). Even if it's technically better, the most sane business decision from enterprise would be to bet on Microsoft for support reasons. Microsoft tal…

Don’t forget the rapid and severe Google maps price increases. These are the gift that will keep on giving for Microsoft and Amazon in the mindshare of developers and business leaders. Incredibly stupid move.

Do most enterprise companies care about the price of Google Maps? My company hosts on AWS, Azure and GCP, and I couldn't tell you how much Google Maps costs (or indeed, that there was even a paid tier, though it makes sense for embedded maps and such).

Re: Google May Have to Get Used to Third Place in the Cloud

#229
post #218

From product perspective, Google cloud is far ahead from AWS and Azure. As one who runs a company that operates on all 3, serving over 3b+ HTTPS requests daily, across 250K of web apps, in all continents, I can say clear and simple: GCP Compute, Networking stack and storage are a superior product when compared to AWS and Azure. For every dollar you pay: - You get more compute power per core, while paying less. - You…

... and you get what you pay for. Whenever I've had a problem on AWS, I've spoken to a human being, and had a detailed information on what was happening and how they were fixing it.

I don't have a support plan through Amazon, but I do a bit of business there (now).

When I had a problem with Google, the response was a stone wall. Online FAQs and no one to talk to. Even security issues, they blow people off on.

I wouldn't base a business on the Google Cloud. Too big a risk.

Post reply on HN