Live data from Hacker News

Reddit just passed Facebook as #3 most popular website in US

alexa.com

221–230 of 609 posts

Re: Reddit just passed Facebook as #3 most popular website in US

#221
post #15

Reddit works because it’s anonymous, information-dense and relatively ad-free. Change any one of those three and the user base will abandon you. It’s been Reddit’s dilemma since the beginning: you can’t monetize a toxic user base that has total freedom. Sure you can try to drive away the toxic users, but it turns out that those toxic users are also pretty influential in non-toxic aspects. I’m still skeptical of Reddi…

Reddit is now adding profile info and friends and such. Unfortunately.

The last thing it needed was that. Those just amplify the thundering herd problem.

Re: Reddit just passed Facebook as #3 most popular website in US

#222
post #58

As a long, long time user of Reddit, it has been quite saddening to see its descent into the shallow, ultra-toxic husk of a corporate entity that it is today. I'm not surprised by its popularity; it's a headline-surfers paradise, one in which you get feel good points for displays of virtue or shitposting easily digested content in an era of unparalleled narcissism and shortened attention spans. All is not lost though…

I am also a long time reddit user, 10 or so years at this point. It's not obvious to me that reddit is particularly different than it was in the past. There's just more of it now.

It depends: each subreddit is its own little world

Re: Reddit just passed Facebook as #3 most popular website in US

#223
post #111

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think the flip side to this is that the communities are becoming so large now that they aren't really a community. I sometimes go on the /r/UK and the level of discussion gets lower and lower as the community dissolves. Rather than getting to know people everyone is just shouting into the void - unaware of who anyone else is.

I think this is more associated with the fact that all communities (real communities) are small. Try a more focused interest group. /r/pathology, for example, is only a few thousand folks, mainly people working at the graduate or post-doctoral level.

If you tack /comments on the end of smaller subreddits you get a vbulletin-like effect of bumping the most recent conversation to the top. This can be useful if you’re jonesing for a debate but nothing’s moving.

Re: Reddit just passed Facebook as #3 most popular website in US

#224

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Quickly? More like always. That’s precisely what upvote/downvote buttons are designed to do. It’s their job. Don’t like downvotes? Try a different subreddit. There is always a more welcoming and engaging subreddit just around the corner. Personally I use Reddit for amusing and funny subreddits and so the political bullshit is never my problem. And you can have the same today for the low, low cost of not giving a shit…

You just proved his point of Tyranny of the majority.

If you want to avoid that, you need an entirely new set of site rules. Subreddit moderation won’t change that. I’m not saying tyranny of the majority/minority is good or bad, but simply how the site is designed, and that in many subreddits, it isn’t a problem at all.

Re: Reddit just passed Facebook as #3 most popular website in US

#225

Reddit has always been a strange place to me, even as it has grown to be a cornerstone of socialization on the internet. I didn't grow up with it, I'm still not a huge fan of the layout even after the redesign, the way comments work still annoys me, and there are still plenty of stereotypical Reddit users that I do not want to associate or be associated with. However, I can no longer deny that it serves no purpose or…

> Reddit also doesn't have cute features like emoticons, their markdown isn't as intuitive as BBCode tags to me, and the versatility of a given Reddit board is limited to what can be done with CSS and each board's Wiki.

We do have a set of "snoomoji" that will be released soon. Not sure of the scope of the release (they're already in use for our chat feature).

BBCode tags and markdown are too complicated for most users, so we've introduced a rich-text editor for comments and posts.

We do host images and video. It doesn't make sense for us to host other files.

> Am I joining the e-Dinosaur ranks?

I ask myself this when I watch young people use snapchat.

Re: Reddit just passed Facebook as #3 most popular website in US

#226
post #188
post #94

The biggest value gain from Reddit, to me, is the ability to centralize effectively around different hobbies and activities. In the past, if you wanted to find an online community for a movie or a game, you had to find a forum for that community. Finding forums that are well managed and capture a good segment of the community is hard -- and Reddit just becomes a default place to look now. Let's say a new TV show star…

It's essentially usenet for current times. Which I've always found interesting, as usenet would give reddit users back the freedoms they often crave: no ads, no censorship, no tracking, etc.

Usenet had plenty of ads, I’d still prefer it to reddit though.

Re: Reddit just passed Facebook as #3 most popular website in US

#227
post #15

Reddit works because it’s anonymous, information-dense and relatively ad-free. Change any one of those three and the user base will abandon you. It’s been Reddit’s dilemma since the beginning: you can’t monetize a toxic user base that has total freedom. Sure you can try to drive away the toxic users, but it turns out that those toxic users are also pretty influential in non-toxic aspects. I’m still skeptical of Reddi…

Reddit is now adding profile info and friends and such. Unfortunately.

Better than than lose all of their sub-communities to discord.

Re: Reddit just passed Facebook as #3 most popular website in US

#228

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't think Steve is stupid enough to make the new design compulsory. He has mentioned hundreds of times how the redesign killed Digg. Old users would keep using Reddit by visiting old.reddit.com (or by opting out of redesign). They are not going anywhere.

I haven't seen an official statement for this yet. If he's planning to do that, great! Until then.. I'm thinking we're probably all migrating to a facebook-like experience soon.

Here is a statement made by our VP of Product.

Tldr: "old.reddit.com is not going away"

https://www.reddit.com/r/beta/comments/8lv96l/feedback_pleas...

Re: Reddit just passed Facebook as #3 most popular website in US

#229

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It means different things in different contexts. For instance in r/southafrica there is a majority of Afrikaaners on the subreddit despite being a minority (10%) of the country. Any anti-Afrikaaner content is quickly dismissed and downvoted. In r/TwoXChromosome engaging in any discussion on the wage gap as a function of anything other than sexism is met with downvotes. In any majority US subreddit conservative posts…

I speak as someone whose largely the sites demographic (20-35, liberal leaning male), so I'm looking at this from a place where I don't feel threatened or marginalized, so bear with me. What's to stop other groups from starting more focused subreddits? I understand what you're saying /r/Politics has a clearly left lean to it, but /r/Conservative seems to be relatively healthy (from my occasional peek in). Even someth…

This does happen, but it makes things extremely confusing for new users who weren't privy to the drama that led to the fracture.

Consider these: r/news

r/worldnews

r/neutralnews

r/fullnews

r/qualitynews

r/worldevents

r/inthenews

r/anythingoesnews

Eventually the subs become more and more specific and devolve into echo chambers. For whatever reasons, this seems common among philosophy/opinion subs and doesn't seem nearly as prevalent among topical subs.

Post reply on HN