Sounds promising. But not sure what this adds on top of Hangouts, which has a great group (and of course one to one) video calling feature. The only difference seems that Duo works with phone numbers, not Google Accounts.
It seems that a main differentiating feature is also the fact that all calls are end-to-end encrypted. Perhaps as a video-calling alternative to Whatsapp? (given that neither of them are open source)
Google Duo, a simple 1-to-1 video calling app
221–230 of 379 posts
Re: Google Duo, a simple 1-to-1 video calling app
#222It's already bad enough that I have a row of chat apps (WhatsApp, Messenger, Hangouts, Skype, Slack, Telegram etc.) on my phone because I can't get everyone I know to agree on one app and now, Google's trying to get me to add yet another icon to that list! I love Telegram but I couldn't get more than a few friends to try it out and even then, no one checks their Telegram anymore because none of THEIR friends are on i…
but seriously I have the same problem. I liked that hangouts was bringing it all together and had live hangouts, and collaborative document editing and everything.. it feels like they just really didn't work on making hangouts lag free and high throughput and bringing the people there with superior quality calling.
Re: Google Duo, a simple 1-to-1 video calling app
#223I know these will be preinstalled on Android, but many friends and family use iOS and I will feel silly asking them to install Duo and Allo. Hangouts is able to mix voice, video and text just fine. Why start requiring separate apps? This is Google at its dumbest. They are squandering the small amount of momentum Hangouts has.
Google's communications strategy has been bafflingly dumb for years and years now. Almost my ENTIRE social network (that was on chat; this was before every part of society was "on the Internet") used to be on Gchat. That's a massive network-effects advantage that they had ages before anyone else did (including Facebook, but Facebook's network did surpass them with the ability to find someone by their face). Almost a…
Great job Google.
Re: Google Duo, a simple 1-to-1 video calling app
#224Why didn't they just update hangouts? I actually use hangouts for video calls with relative frequency, and I wish it was better adapted to changes in network speed like they say Duo is. I think it would be better if "Duo" was just integrated into hangouts as an update. I like hangouts because it allows me to use one app for voice, text and video.
Hangouts is likely to become a Google Apps Slack competitor, I guess.
[1]: http://www.androidpolice.com/2016/08/16/google-planning-focu...
Re: Google Duo, a simple 1-to-1 video calling app
#225What will make video calling desireable for the average Joe?
Re: Google Duo, a simple 1-to-1 video calling app
#226I know these will be preinstalled on Android, but many friends and family use iOS and I will feel silly asking them to install Duo and Allo. Hangouts is able to mix voice, video and text just fine. Why start requiring separate apps? This is Google at its dumbest. They are squandering the small amount of momentum Hangouts has.
Ignoring that I probably won't use this (no fan of of that company), if it doesn't require a weird setup it might be more accessible than Hangouts. At least last time I checked Hangouts required you to join G+ first? Is that still the case?
Allo I think will be the same - they're transitioning to phone # based auth instead of Google account auth so that using a Google account is not a limiting factor.
Re: Google Duo, a simple 1-to-1 video calling app
#227In my entire post tech life and post tech environment I have never seen anyone use, talk or desire to have a video call. (Save 1 when a patron tested FaceTime on their new iPhone.) What will make video calling desireable for the average Joe?
Re: Google Duo, a simple 1-to-1 video calling app
#228Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm following matrix.org and vector.im development, hoping they'll get good and take off. Main thing stopping me from jumping on board is that running a matrix home server is said to be very resource intensive and my home server is already overloaded. Maybe later.
I've actually been running my own matrix.org home server quite fine for over a couple of months now on a $5/month vps via digital ocean. ADMITTEDLY, the scale of users on this instance is low in numbers, so your mileage may vary with more users, more activity, etc. I'm using this low-spec vps simply to test things out, and learn about matrix.org. You should give it a try. Whether you use digital ocean or any other co…
99% of people will never run their own matrix server, and 98% of people will never pay $5/mo for a chat service.
Basically, where can the general public sign up for a matrix account that's free, offers a good experience, and respects my rights?
Re: Google Duo, a simple 1-to-1 video calling app
#229Re: Google Duo, a simple 1-to-1 video calling app
#230In my entire post tech life and post tech environment I have never seen anyone use, talk or desire to have a video call. (Save 1 when a patron tested FaceTime on their new iPhone.) What will make video calling desireable for the average Joe?