Live data from Hacker News

Bitcoin 'creator' backs out of Satoshi coin move 'proof'

bbc.co.uk

221–230 of 294 posts

Re: Bitcoin 'creator' backs out of Satoshi coin move 'proof'

#221

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This would be rather genius. And extremely unlikely, but effective if true and ever enacted.

Why would it be clever to put yourself on the map when before no one would have even considered you?

Well, this tinfoil theory is assuming that the leaks several months ago putting him on the map were actually legitimate and he didn't have a choice about it.

Re: Bitcoin 'creator' backs out of Satoshi coin move 'proof'

#223
post #48

The only blamable thing in this story is that the so called mainstream media are not technically knowledgeable enough to "scientifically" check their news sources. Good thing, all the nerds around have exposed the scheme in such a short time, I like this era !!

And the New York Times story about this still insists that his initial "proof" was genuine!

Re: Bitcoin 'creator' backs out of Satoshi coin move 'proof'

#224
post #153

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There appears to be significant overlap with the narcissist checklist and a "revered tech leader checklist" (Jobs, Musk, Page, Zuckerberg, etc).

Steve Jobs in his relationships with friends and family, and his own self-destructive (ultimately fatally destructive) streak screams full blown sociopath and always has. Then again, he might just have been a really shitty person without a personality disorder to explain it.

There's a possible simpler explanation: his work was always priority #1 for him, and he completely buried his head in it, to the detriment of everything else. Of course, now I'm also speculating some bullshit about someone I've never met. It's always interesting to watch people try to label others without having known them. And no, "had lunch with him once" or "heard him speak at a conference" does not mean you know a single thing about someone, their mental state, or their life.

A huge portion of the population is not made up of happy-go-lucky, oblivious-to-the-world individuals, and someone comparing themselves to public figures in some vain attempt to show just how nice and normal their own life is... sigh. There are what, probably over a billion people, that random strangers would label with all kinds of mental illness. If it's that common, most of those cases are not mental illness, - it's just a personality type. Another person having a different personality than your own does not mean something is abnormal about them.

Re: Bitcoin 'creator' backs out of Satoshi coin move 'proof'

#225

Given his history as a prolific liar, I find his post to be utter bullshit. Note how he's still lying about things he was caught at: "When the rumours began, my qualifications and character were attacked. When those allegations were proven false". NO - it was established (with confirmation from the schools in question) that he lied about having a PhD from Charles Stuart U. and he definitely does not possess 8 masters…

He already made it out of Australia and is "hiding" in the UK.

I'd read of that elsewhere but wasn't sure. Here's to hoping both countries have adequate agreements to facilitate shipping him back home to face the music.

Re: Bitcoin 'creator' backs out of Satoshi coin move 'proof'

#226
post #208

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Steve Jobs in his relationships with friends and family, and his own self-destructive (ultimately fatally destructive) streak screams full blown sociopath and always has. Then again, he might just have been a really shitty person without a personality disorder to explain it.

Am I understanding correctly that you are blaming an undiagnosed sociopathy for Jobs' death by pancreatic cancer induced respratory arrest?

> undiagnosed sociopathy for Jobs' death

Even Jobs realized his self-delusions had cost him some time, at the end.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/alicegwalton/2011/10/24/steve-jo...

Re: Bitcoin 'creator' backs out of Satoshi coin move 'proof'

#227

Humans are not monkies and never were. It is believed that the two species shared a common ancestor at some point. Edit: If someone has evidence otherwise, please post.

Your comment was seen as pedantic and nonconstructive.

And a comment referring to us as "angry monkeys" is non-pedant constructivism?

Where can I view these observations?

Re: Bitcoin 'creator' backs out of Satoshi coin move 'proof'

#228
post #131

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think you misunderstand the purpose of Bitcoin. It's not meant to be a payment system, but rather a settlement layer.

The top ten results of "bitcoin purpose" on Google concur that in it's current implementation, in how the community and business world view and use it, Bitcoin is meant to be an electronic currency. The FTC recognizes it as a commodity, something that can be bought and sold. In it's current incarnation, it is the equivalent of bartering with baseball cards in lieu of cash. If your point is true, then the purpose has…

>The FTC recognizes it as a commodity, something that can be bought and sold. In it's current incarnation, it is the equivalent of bartering with baseball cards in lieu of cash.

The US government has a stake in the failure of non-state-controlled currencies, though, so this isn't really evidence of anything.

Post reply on HN