Live data from Hacker News

The most obsolete infrastructure money could buy – my worst job ever

snellman.net

221–230 of 242 posts

Re: The most obsolete infrastructure money could buy – my worst job ever

#221

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Wow. Their end-goal upgrade, the one that they've installed on one line, and are installing on everything else looks so antiquated. My city's subway/elevated train system will be 30 years old this December. Train control is fully automated ; there are no drivers on trains, and in normal operation there is no remote (human) operator either. It's been automated for 30 years. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SkyTrain_(Vanc…

Another thing about the NYC subway is that it runs 24 hours a day 365 days a year. Not many metros around the world can make that claim. Living in New York, the amazing thing about the subway system is how they keep it running. It's old and ridiculously complex, and despite what natives say, the MTA by and large does a good job running it. There's no political will to fix it right now. It's going to take trains becom…

Yep. They do a pretty darn good job, considering what they have to work with.

And I'm not talking just the technology - they have 31 billion dollars of debt to service, and constantly get the shaft from Albany when it comes to funding. They continue to take on debt because they have mandated projects and lack the funding to complete them.

Re: The most obsolete infrastructure money could buy – my worst job ever

#222

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Wow. Their end-goal upgrade, the one that they've installed on one line, and are installing on everything else looks so antiquated. My city's subway/elevated train system will be 30 years old this December. Train control is fully automated ; there are no drivers on trains, and in normal operation there is no remote (human) operator either. It's been automated for 30 years. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SkyTrain_(Vanc…

The problem with some of these old lines is that they might have level crossings in which pedestrians or cars might occupy the tracks - so someone needs to be there to stop the train if that happens. Fully automated systems like the SkyTrain or Japan's Yurikamome line have grade-separated tracks (and in some cases platform gates as well) to ensure that sort of incursion doesn't happen.

The NYC subway system has no level crossings where pedestrians can occupy the tracks.

The only level crossing where another train might occupy the tracks is Queens-bound from the JMZ stop at Myrtle Ave & Broadway in Brooklyn. The M crosses at grade over the J/Z track.

Re: The most obsolete infrastructure money could buy – my worst job ever

#223
post #120

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You're suggesting legally chasing a few weeks salary after nearly 20 years? That's quite a grudge you're encouraging, and likely to cost much more than it would gain, even if it could be proven.

In Washington State, the state will pursue them with glee and vigor free of charge (to you). I think 20 years is a little outside how old a debt they would track, though.

Most states will do the fight. 20 years may well be too late, but anyone in a similar position should just call and find out.

Re: The most obsolete infrastructure money could buy – my worst job ever

#224

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Glad you got out of it so quickly. I spent five years in Pick at the turn of the century and it set my career back quite a bit. Just out of curiosity, how did you get out and what are you working on these days?

> Just out of curiosity, how did you get out and what are you working on these days? I quit and went to grad school. I'm now a computer science professor.

Awesome.

Re: The most obsolete infrastructure money could buy – my worst job ever

#225
post #37

As soon as I saw the title, I thought of the furor when Gingrich and Clinton discovered that the FAA was using vacuum tube computers and radar in the air traffic control system. http://govinfo.library.unt.edu/npr/library/clinton.htm The foreign (sole) vacuum tube supplier that Clinton mentioned was Russia. Oh, the embarrassment! I knew that there were some delays in rolling out the the replacement system, so I did so…

Probably Raytheon's STAR program. I wasn't involved but one from inside it was rumored to be one of the biggest boondoggles there (and thats saying something). I think it inspired the "yesterdays technology tomorrow" motto.

And I know for a fact that they still haven't managed to kill it, despite actual internal will to do so.

If it is Raytheon's STAR program, the consultancy is probably CSC.

Re: The most obsolete infrastructure money could buy – my worst job ever

#226

How ancient this all seems . . . until you realize people are doing the exact same thing by shipping "golden" VM/container images around instead of doing proper package and configuration management.

As a engineer I do not have time to get into this new VM/container thing. I fail to see how it leads to anything productive ( no offence ). Call me a simpleton but I am happy with better package management and config systems.

Basically, it allows you to requisition servers more quickly by providing a baseline system. If you're not doing scalable-on-demand work (and most of us aren't), it's not that useful.

Re: The most obsolete infrastructure money could buy – my worst job ever

#227

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Add "Crystal Reports" and "MUMPS" to the "do not put on resume" list. I never even actually worked with Crystal Reports. A long time ago, I made a bunch of similar resumes that each included one thing extra on them, because I was curious about what I could be learning to get better response rates. The Crystal Reports variant produced a deluge of the worst-sounding jobs touted by the most clueless recruiters. And that…

It seems like everyone wants resumes in Word format. The one time I tried to send a PDF the recruiter nearly treated it like it was some unknown format and asked me to resend as Word.

If you're seeing a demand for it in Word format, they're a recruiter and a lazy one at that.

Most in-house guys accept PDF. I explicitly tell recruiters that my resume is typset, so they have a choice: a PDF or a LaTeX file that nobody will ever make heads or tails out of.

Re: The most obsolete infrastructure money could buy – my worst job ever

#228

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Add "Crystal Reports" and "MUMPS" to the "do not put on resume" list. I never even actually worked with Crystal Reports. A long time ago, I made a bunch of similar resumes that each included one thing extra on them, because I was curious about what I could be learning to get better response rates. The Crystal Reports variant produced a deluge of the worst-sounding jobs touted by the most clueless recruiters. And that…

It seems like everyone wants resumes in Word format. The one time I tried to send a PDF the recruiter nearly treated it like it was some unknown format and asked me to resend as Word.

If you're seeing a demand for it in Word format, they're a recruiter and a lazy one at that.

Most in-house guys accept PDF. I explicitly tell recruiters that my resume is typset, so they have a choice: a PDF or a LaTeX file that nobody will ever make heads or tails out of. I do not even know if LaTeX has a .doc plugin.

Re: The most obsolete infrastructure money could buy – my worst job ever

#229

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A similarly embarrassing state of affairs is the train traffic control system used by the NYC subway system: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mjx3S3UjmnA

They're showing a really old tower in that video. Most of the system does not use mechanical lever interlocking machines. It's mostly General Railway Signal NX, which is entirely relay-based. NX, (for eNtry eXit), is probably the first system with an intelligent user interface. The dispatcher has a track map, with lights showing which blocks are occupied. To route a train through the controlled area, the dispatcher p…

That's really cool! Living in NYC, I didn't even know this.

Re: The most obsolete infrastructure money could buy – my worst job ever

#230

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Where is the national do-not-call list for clueless tech recruiters?

I maintain one at http://www.rogerbinns.com/blocked_recruiters.txt My resume has a "note to recruiters" attached. It is very clear if a recruiter has made any effort to read any of that. The clueless ones end up in the list above. http://www.rogerbinns.com/recruiters.html

I might add pierpoint.com to that list. A few hours ago, I got an email from them asking me if I was interested in a job with my immediate previous employer (which is kind of a mu question to ask, as I'm so interested in that idea that I've actually secured a start date there in less than 2 weeks--let's just say that I really liked it there and regret leaving).

If the guy there had done anything more than scrape LinkedIn for .NET stuff (which I can do and have done), he'd know that I would not need assistance in returning to $FORMER_EMPLOYER.

Post reply on HN