Earlier quoted context omitted.
From the Sony pictures incident to the attack on that satirical magazine in Paris to this, it's getting pretty tiresome having to deal with authoritarian types who believe they should dictate what other people can say or access. For those curious, see below for a write up of the malicious javascript (uses a simple ajax call & random number timer): http://insight-labs.org/?p=1682 document.write(" http://libs.baidu.com…
Loading all of jQuery seems a little bit excessive when the only thing they're using is the $.ajax function. http://youmightnotneedjquery.com/#request
China's Man-On-the-Side Attack on GitHub
211–220 of 323 posts
Re: China's Man-On-the-Side Attack on GitHub
#212Earlier quoted context omitted.
It only really ramped up this year. http://furbo.org/2015/01/22/fear-china/
Don't know why your comment has been voted down, that's an interesting link and blog post and totally relevant to this thread :\
Re: China's Man-On-the-Side Attack on GitHub
#213For me the most interesting thig about this incident is how the GFW is being used offensively. Most other governments so far have protested online censorship from a kind of moral standpoint, but not from a security standpoint per se. Now it's quite clear the GFW is being leveraged offensively - did anyone spot this capability previously?
It's an identical setup to the NSA QUANTUM infrastructure, just in China instead of scattered around the western internet system. So I guess it's probably been used offensively in a more targeted approach for a while.
Re: China's Man-On-the-Side Attack on GitHub
#214Earlier quoted context omitted.
They are back on github now; they were indeed temporarily changed to return only alert("WARNING: malicious javascript detected on this domain"); (or something similar). I saw this myself.
Wait, how does that work? Looking at the malicious javascript code issuing ajax requests to github, it doen't seem github's response is evaluated. Is this alert even displayed? If that is the case, why not do something even more radical in the response like changing the targeted urls ? They could replace them by baidu urls for example, effectively transforming a DDoS against github into a DDoS against baidu (not sayi…
Re: China's Man-On-the-Side Attack on GitHub
#215Earlier quoted context omitted.
> why not simply generate the traffic yourself ? Couldn't github simply null-route all chinese-origin traffic in that case? Currently the DDoS comes from everywhere except china
The point of this DDoS attack is to prevent people in China from accessing content on github. To null-route chinese-origin traffic would mean that the attackers win. (Obviously VPNs could be used to circumvent this null-route but they then become vulnerable to the same attack)
China already has the capability to block people in china accessing github (and I assume it does)
Re: China's Man-On-the-Side Attack on GitHub
#216So, the real question is how should we , the tech community, react?
More SSL. This attack works because the firewall is capable of reading plain HTTP requests to spot the ones that are requesting the target javascripts, and then statelessly injecting raced packets. Neither technique works when SSL is in use. Even if China simply demanded the SSL keys from Baidu, they'd have to decrypt every single connection on the fly and significantly upgrade their infrastructure. I think the only…
Umm... not really. All you'd have to do is select whatever subset of connections you want to inject code in to, and then terminate them with your own web server that has Baidu's SSL keys, then let the rest of the connections go through transparently to Baidu.
Re: China's Man-On-the-Side Attack on GitHub
#217Earlier quoted context omitted.
They are back on github now; they were indeed temporarily changed to return only alert("WARNING: malicious javascript detected on this domain"); (or something similar). I saw this myself.
From the Sony pictures incident to the attack on that satirical magazine in Paris to this, it's getting pretty tiresome having to deal with authoritarian types who believe they should dictate what other people can say or access. For those curious, see below for a write up of the malicious javascript (uses a simple ajax call & random number timer): http://insight-labs.org/?p=1682 document.write(" http://libs.baidu.com…
Most likely unrelated to North Korea and used for propagandistic purposes (including publicity for a below par movie).
Re: China's Man-On-the-Side Attack on GitHub
#218Earlier quoted context omitted.
Loading all of jQuery seems a little bit excessive when the only thing they're using is the $.ajax function. http://youmightnotneedjquery.com/#request
On which side are you ._.
Re: China's Man-On-the-Side Attack on GitHub
#219Earlier quoted context omitted.
I live in China, and I disagree with your statement, but I can understand why you think like that. Usually when you reside in a country for a long time, you don't think the government as a whole, big, flat thing. The size of the it is gigantic, so that anything you do, you might be interacting with government at some level. I'm not judging this but giving you an image of what it's like living in China, salt, gas, new…
> China wants to fork their own internet, for their own people. I thought it was pretty well known that the BRICS countries want their own internet: http://www.infowars.com/brics-countries-build-new-internet-t...
Re: China's Man-On-the-Side Attack on GitHub
#220Earlier quoted context omitted.
You are right. The degree and sophistication of media manipulation is profoundly greater in the west. While the Chinese block a lot of media, the manipulation is minimal. Most Chinese are very cynical and know exactly what is going on. The west, or at least the US, traps people in a matrix of sorts where they don't even see the manipulation. The narrative is exquisitely framed and guided to leave people with a sense…
If you want to publish your own newspaper, you can. Nobody will stop you. Start your own online video news service, weblog or nes site - nobody will stop you. Post whatever you like to Reddit, or any other discussion platform. In China and Russia you cannot do these things. Published mdeia are strictly monitored and censored. The state employs thousands of astroturfers to flood social media with pro-government messag…
EDIT: I don't understand the downvotes. It is both relevant (it refutes that you can "Post whatever you like to Reddit, or any other discussion platform." without punishment), and correct.