Live data from Hacker News

Google has abandoned Google News?

elgan.com

211–220 of 222 posts

Re: Google has abandoned Google News?

#211

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Arguably a little longer, its just compounded, Windows peaked at 8 and 10 was downhill spiral, 11 is just all the bad stuff that 10 had available out of the box.

I’ve never heard someone claim windows peaked at 8, at least 7.

Everyone hated Vista, 7 was okay, but 8.1 was way better. It was super polished, Windows 10 has been the worst version I have ever used. Windows 8.1 was one of the last versions to run faster on lesser hardware btw.

Re: Google has abandoned Google News?

#212

imo, Google is just slowing dying. Each tools they made slowly lost trust until there is no way to believe it again. Idk if it is just the current propaganda, but they just told us we can't even trust google sat images. So now we can't even trust google maps to drive.

I tried to use regular google search recently and discovered the advanced settings don't let me filter by date ranges anymore. All I wanted was a article or page about an event from the early 2010s but the filter is gone and the keywords clash too much with recent events so it's literally impossible to find what I wanted on google now. Fuck.

Re: Google has abandoned Google News?

#214
post #2

Now, when I do my traditional searches, a huge majority of some of my searches are from Instagram or other social media sites, not news publishing sites. Many of my results are in foreign languages I cannot even identify. Many of my results are published in foreign countries, not the U.S. as I specified. Now, the most recent failure is that when I specify news published in, say, the past week, it just ignores that se…

[dead]

Re: Google has abandoned Google News?

#215

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It was sloppy wording, sorry. But there were plenty of scientists saying this is ridiculous Given the timing - you wouldn't be the one who flagged all those comments, would you?

There are scientists saying God is real

https://rumble.com/vt62y6-covid-19-a-second-opinion.html

Re: Google has abandoned Google News?

#217

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you feel your thoughts fall on deaf ears then why did you reply in the first place? I feel your comments do not clarify anything you’re trying to say. I feel your comment doesn’t even address what I was talking about. I asked nicely that you clarify and your response is to tell me I’m ignoring you. Godspeed to you too if you have nothing to say.

It seems like he's saying to use open source software, and firefox is one of those options. Since it's open source, you "own" it soup to nuts, thus sovereign.

This.

Re: Google has abandoned Google News?

#218
post #193

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Occam's razor: maybe there isn't a conspiracy to suppress true information, but rather, maybe that information is just wrong and stupid.

Again, it would be useful for down voters to follow up, especially since google admitted wrong and agrees with me about their censorship https://publichealthpolicyjournal.com/unacceptable-and-wrong... The vaccine now includes myocarditis as a known risks. https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/safety-availabi... Causing the stocks to slide when the link was made https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/other/vaccine-st…

It's unfortunate anything related to this topic is still so unnecessarily polarizing.

Re: Google has abandoned Google News?

#219
post #51

People don't like reading news these days. It is sad. Nevertheless Google is not supporting this product as they could.

I disagree. They dislike the news options they have. I’ve been dying for a decent and unbiased news aggregator. They simply do not exist presently.

you may be exceptional :) I am not claiming that noone wants to read but the main stream is focused on shorts not text.

Re: Google has abandoned Google News?

#220

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you feel your thoughts fall on deaf ears then why did you reply in the first place? I feel your comments do not clarify anything you’re trying to say. I feel your comment doesn’t even address what I was talking about. I asked nicely that you clarify and your response is to tell me I’m ignoring you. Godspeed to you too if you have nothing to say.

It seems like he's saying to use open source software, and firefox is one of those options. Since it's open source, you "own" it soup to nuts, thus sovereign.

Except Firefox doesn’t qualify there because, as I’ve already expressed, it’s captured by Google (he wrote from Librewolf which is nearly perfect and gets the job done as better example than the other poster gave).

Your reply only acknowledges the last line and doesn’t explain any of the other poster’s thoughts either. What did they mean by any of the following where they discuss “building” and what does that have to do with using Firefox:

> the final OSI layer is always people, and the struggle is never ending. The primitives exist for those with hope and will to build.

> If the default is dead, strive to survive. I’m tired too, know when to rest, not to quit. The toolbox and pattern is straightforward for build mode.

Post reply on HN