211–220 of 228 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Isn't time for you to give us a break and stop posting in all threads then? It's clearly spamming.
Some of us really like simonw's analysis, personality, and transparency. Just because you don't like it doesn't make it "spam"
The pricing is insane: $1.25/$4.5 for 1M tokens, and $0.15 for cached input! https://dev.meta.ai/docs/getting-started/pricing-rate-limits
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Some of us really like simonw's analysis, personality, and transparency. Just because you don't like it doesn't make it "spam"
He plainly stated that he's spamming HN. The fact that you like the content doesn't change that
Earlier quoted context omitted.
If he deflates their revenues, who is going to rent the compute from Meta?
The goal is not for meta to take their market, the goal would be for meta to damage their competitors. If meta releases an open-weight LLM that is not Chinese made, cheaper to run than the SOTA premiums, etc, it would lower the number of people paying for frontier labs models. We saw with with early LLAMA models, but they didn’t keep up in the race with v4. Meta would benefit from this, not from increased revenue at…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is still ridiculously expensive imagine having to pay $10 for 100 search results on Google, thats essentially what this is. I really dont see how anyone's willing spend more than $1.50 per mm output. Let alone $15-50. Does anyone actually pay for usage based billing as a consumer?
Yeah, DeepSeek V4 (Flash and Pro) is below $0.004 for 1M cache hits. Even with usage based billing I'm below $1 writing code all day.
same, pi as a harness works best, better than claude code and open code.
My trust factor is gone with Meta right now. Has there been any independent analysis to confirm they didn't cheat on benchmarks again?
Can't we use it even if we don't trust it?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
all he has to do is that prove builing these inst hard anymore. because the whole moat these companies have is the perception that building models at frontier is really hard .
Hitherto he's pretty much proved the opposite. I guess we'll see how Meta did this time.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
He plainly stated that he's spamming HN. The fact that you like the content doesn't change that
link? I don't see it on this page but it's a big thread and may have missed it.
Posting his links and engaging in the discussions is his main job. This is spam, even if you like it - because most people don't want to see one person posting their links on every AI discussion, ranked at the top just because among hundreds of thousands of people reading HN, some thousands are not annoyed by seeing his blog links in every post.
Where is the data retention policy information for paid API per-token uses? Every other provider has one and makes it clear how they handle your data. A quick look doesn’t show one for this new offering.
Paid prompts are not used for training. Data retention is not entirely clear, they will keep it if they think you're breaking the rules, but it's not clear how long they keep it if they don't think you're breaking the rules.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
link? I don't see it on this page but it's a big thread and may have missed it.
> My blog genuinely is a day job now, I make enough from the (unobtrusive, cookie-free) sponsorship banner Posting his links and engaging in the discussions is his main job. This is spam, even if you like it - because most people don't want to see one person posting their links on every AI discussion, ranked at the top just because among hundreds of thousands of people reading HN, some thousands are not annoyed by se…