Earlier quoted context omitted.
The definition of Zionism is: people who believe Israel has a right to exist.
So we're all Abolitionists? Pakistanists?
Microsoft Israel chief leaves amid ethical controversy
211–218 of 218 posts
Re: Microsoft Israel chief leaves amid ethical controversy
#212Earlier quoted context omitted.
Documenting war crimes is propaganda? The first article just shows a sliver of the crimes they commit, documented by a western source. I found an article that talks about how similar crimes with dogs raping prisoners was done in Chile, so it's not far fetched at all that the israelis are doing the same.
You said "the evidence is there" about Israeli rape dogs, not some other allegation. An incident that has nothing to with rape isn't evidence, nor is an incident that happened in an entirely different country.
Re: Microsoft Israel chief leaves amid ethical controversy
#213Earlier quoted context omitted.
They are a resistance group that was formed after the occupation of Palestine. We've seen time and time again the israelis deliberately target and snipe civilians, it's very well documented and has been happening since the beginning of the invasion. Even the NYT recently published an article about how the israelies use dogs to rape Palestinians. The invader terror regime is exposed, no justification for their crimes…
> We've seen time and time again the israelis deliberately target and snipe civilians There is no evidence that this is in any way a deliberate Israeli policy, obviously collateral damage is going to be an issue when the enemy(Hamas) hides amongst civilians and doesn't wear military uniforms.
Are we forgetting that the israelis literally dressed up as women (covered themselves entirely) to commit war crimes in a hospital?
Re: Microsoft Israel chief leaves amid ethical controversy
#214Earlier quoted context omitted.
> They're mass surveilling the vulnerable Palestinians This is mostly so that they can more accurately target Palestinian terrorist/militant groups that hide behind civilians(which is of course a war crime). > now turning their eyes toward Lebanon and Syria The Oct 7th attacks likely happened because they weren't keeping a close enough watch over Palestinians in Gaza and were overly focused on threats from Lebanon an…
> This is mostly so that they can more accurately target Palestinian terrorist/militant groups that hide behind civilians(which is of course a war crime). The mass casualties of children are a strong indicator that the targeting is not accurate. Government officials and elected representatives have repeatedly advocated for the assassination of all Palestinians.
Re: Microsoft Israel chief leaves amid ethical controversy
#215Earlier quoted context omitted.
So we're all Abolitionists? Pakistanists?
I don’t understand your reply. What does Pakistan have to do with anything? Abolitionists? Abolish what, Israel? Sure, but I’ve never heard anyone refer to themselves like that.
Re: Microsoft Israel chief leaves amid ethical controversy
#216Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don’t understand your reply. What does Pakistan have to do with anything? Abolitionists? Abolish what, Israel? Sure, but I’ve never heard anyone refer to themselves like that.
The point is that the term Zionist makes as much sense as Abolitionist. Abolitionists succeeded. Israel exists. Pakistan exists. If you support the extermination of Jews and the country of Israel, just say so. Pretending that "Zionist" means something is brain dead.
Re: Microsoft Israel chief leaves amid ethical controversy
#217Earlier quoted context omitted.
So there was no surveillance during the Holocaust then?
I think the main difference is that the nazis built entire factories and supply chains to more effectively use their limited resources, while Israel, being funded largely by the US, has no such constraints and can use military equipment to, to use an American figure of language, shoot fish in a barrel. What the Israeli government is doing is, at best, unconscionable.
Now its all David Duke fans.
Re: Microsoft Israel chief leaves amid ethical controversy
#218Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think the main difference is that the nazis built entire factories and supply chains to more effectively use their limited resources, while Israel, being funded largely by the US, has no such constraints and can use military equipment to, to use an American figure of language, shoot fish in a barrel. What the Israeli government is doing is, at best, unconscionable.
Wow, this used to be the website with the smart comment section. Now its all David Duke fans.