Live data from Hacker News

FOSDEM 2026 – Open-Source Conference in Brussels – Day#1 Recap

gyptazy.com

211–220 of 251 posts

Re: FOSDEM 2026 – Open-Source Conference in Brussels – Day#1 Recap

#211
post #10
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Hello from a packed devroom. You can't attend all 30+ tracks at once anyway, you need to see recordings afterwards anyway if you are remotely interested in consuming the conference. I'd say the experience is just as much about meeting the people behind all the internet handles, getting into a full lecture room one talk in advance and listening in to something you otherwise wouldn't, join something bigger than email l…

The most important realization about FOSDEM is really: There's no way you can fully experience it or do it optimal. It's really about making sure you get value out of it, listen to some interesting talks and meet some people.

I was sitting behind you as you wrote this comment.

I just wanted to tell you that.

Re: FOSDEM 2026 – Open-Source Conference in Brussels – Day#1 Recap

#212

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Some views deserve to be judged. I've met people who genuinely believe there is nothing wrong with killing millions of people just because they aren't like you. Most people are horrified by that idea, but he isn't, he finds it quite normal, as normal as taking an umbrella because it's raining. I think it's okay to judge that.

I agree. I just want to tell you that those people are an exceedingly small minority. To deny another human being the rights you enjoy is imho the same as denying yourself those rights (because I, as a 3rd person, see both people as equal, and otherwise there is a paradox). This is the basis of our justice system, we "put people away" in cages, and in some places even kill them, because they believed their right to s…

I've met an exceedingly small number of people who state the worldview outright, but I've met a much larger number of people whose actions are only consistent with that internal worldview.

Re: FOSDEM 2026 – Open-Source Conference in Brussels – Day#1 Recap

#213

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What do you connect to, when you connect to varlink, if there is no broker service?

It's kinda weird to present this as a DBus alternative when it doesn't even offer the same facilities, particularly many-to-many communication. Though I have a pretty good idea of where a Varlink broker would turn up and which init system it would be tied to.

Very typical systemd–developer style.

Re: FOSDEM 2026 – Open-Source Conference in Brussels – Day#1 Recap

#214

Offline videos are available here: https://video.fosdem.org/2026 It's organized by room which you can find here: https://fosdem.org/2026/schedule/tracks/

Appreciate the .vtt files

Easier to preview content before downloading

Re: FOSDEM 2026 – Open-Source Conference in Brussels – Day#1 Recap

#215
post #182

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think you are misrepresenting this; Varlink is based on much more conventional UNIX technology than Dbus, which is decades old: You connect to a named UNIX socket through its socket file in the filesystem (man page: unix(7)). This is an old mechanism and it is known to work well. It does not require a broker service, it works right at system startup, and it does not require a working user database for permission ch…

What do you connect to, when you connect to varlink, if there is no broker service?

Those are pathname UNIX domain sockets, so you address them through the socket file, which is conventionally stored somewhere under /run.

You can run "netstat --listening --unix" to list the UNIX domain servers on your system, to get an impression.

See https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/unix.7.html

Re: FOSDEM 2026 – Open-Source Conference in Brussels – Day#1 Recap

#216

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> your comment sounds like American don't want to protest against Trump because it is too dangerous At this time, we are still openly committed to the 2nd amendment in defense of the 1st, 3rd, 4th, 6th and so on. I am encouraging others to participate in open-carry demonstrations to make it clear to the authoritarians that they will not get the intimidating optics of an unopposed crackdown against a helpless crowd th…

> At this time, we are still openly committed to the 2nd amendment in defense of the 1st, 3rd, 4th, 6th and so on. Has it ever worked? ICE is killing Americans, and you can't point your gun to them, its not lawful. If Trump tells ICE to seize all weapons in the US, or otherwise shoot people, you can't point your gun to them, its not lawful.

> tells ICE to seize all weapons in the US

Outside the constitution, outside their jurisdiction, and not lawful.

Popular sovereignty always works. One way or another.

The most wrong opinion in the debate is to claim that we will be punished for open carry demonstrations. Only an abuse victim excuses the attacker, and allowing the attacker to do what they want is just catch 22.

Re: FOSDEM 2026 – Open-Source Conference in Brussels – Day#1 Recap

#218
post #203

Earlier quoted context omitted.

BTW there were rooms in the past (2005 if I remember) where people could sit with their laptops and hack around.

There were at CCC in 2005, too, now it's all allocated to assembly groups.

Registering an assembly is trivial, but yea you definitely want to associate with one just so you don't have to carry your bag around all day.

Re: FOSDEM 2026 – Open-Source Conference in Brussels – Day#1 Recap

#219
post #167

"But in the end, FOSDEM is not just about talks. It is about meeting people, reconnecting with friends, and having spontaneous conversations that no video stream can fully replace." I don't go to the talks because they are recorded, it's more about meeting friends around a coffee or a beer. Maybe in the future, we will have more tables for hacking like at CCC...

> Maybe in the future, we will have more tables for hacking like at CCC...

Are they construction a new building for that? Or making used of the unused floorspace in the U building?

Re: FOSDEM 2026 – Open-Source Conference in Brussels – Day#1 Recap

#220

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I agree. I just want to tell you that those people are an exceedingly small minority. To deny another human being the rights you enjoy is imho the same as denying yourself those rights (because I, as a 3rd person, see both people as equal, and otherwise there is a paradox). This is the basis of our justice system, we "put people away" in cages, and in some places even kill them, because they believed their right to s…

I've met an exceedingly small number of people who state the worldview outright, but I've met a much larger number of people whose actions are only consistent with that internal worldview.

That is thus all solely your interpretation. I think it is very dangerous to make assumptions about people's internal worldview and judging people on that assumption. In fact I think you have just expressed quite well what I object against, precisely.
Post reply on HN