Earlier quoted context omitted.
Hence why Mullvad is being used as the exit point. You have full e2ee between yourself and Mullvad but crucially Mullvad don't know who your IP. Five eyes are already doing SIGINT on behalf of both the US and the UK government before my connection even reaches Obscura so I lose nothing but potentially gain privacy. How is it you think a single company (Mullvad) having access to my IP and what I am browsing is less se…
I see you are carefully skipping around the point .... Where is Obscura's independent audit ? When has Obscura been tested to the same extent that Mullvad was during its court batttle ? Answer it wasn't. Therefore Mulvad Multi-Hop mode. Or Mullvad + Tor, if you insist. Is the safer choice. And the US juristiction of Obscura is not something you can brush under the carpet like it somehow doesn't matter. With Obscura y…
Other than Wireguard protocol being broken there is no way for Obscura to snoop presuming I check the public key. I'm not saying I trust Obscura, I'm saying with their model I don't need to trust them which is vastly superior. Nor do I need to trust Mullvad.
You keep hand waving around that Obscura are somehow untrustworthy but you have steadfastly refused to address the fact that their model does not require trust. If you trust Mullvad (which you are claiming to) please show an attack that would work to breach this model. You can't.
You would benefit from reading their FAQs and this blog post: https://obscura.net/blog/bootstrapping-trust/