Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
Projection. China does not even try to export their ideologies to the rest of the world who they see as clearly different culturally. The “west” OTOH does not have a good track record of that.
DeepSeek uses banned Nvidia chips for AI model, report says
211–220 of 331 posts
Re: DeepSeek uses banned Nvidia chips for AI model, report says
#212Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think that was the British? We are just getting over hating them ourselves.
A quick read of some British press and you'll realize that the British are going through their own self-hate moment, so everyone is aligned. This is what living in the ashes of an empire does to you. Will come for the USA in time.
Re: DeepSeek uses banned Nvidia chips for AI model, report says
#213I thought this was common knowledge. DeepSeek’s Wikipedia entry says that they trained all their models on Nvidia chips procured before the U.S. embargo to China on them. It wouldn’t surprise me if they continued acquiring them through, well, less than legal means. I also read somewhere (not Wikipedia) that they trained on ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini queries, basically feeding in the output of competitor’s LLMs as tr…
> less than legal means. This is an absurd concept when it comes to international trade. Even intellectual property is mostly meaningless outside a state. Of course people will evade sanctions; what is the us going to do, invade singapore or malaysia?
Re: DeepSeek uses banned Nvidia chips for AI model, report says
#214Earlier quoted context omitted.
I agree that a fair playing field for everyone would be the ideal state. But let's not pretend China doesn't use their influence to keep other countries down as well, and let's not pretend they allow a fair playing field for foreign competitors domestically either. The US would not have imposed these targeted sanctions if China simply wanted to fairly compete in the marketplace.
The US sanctions have nothing to do with free market maximalism. I thought that was quite obvious historically and specially now. They've imposed tariffs on literally every country on the planet.
Re: DeepSeek uses banned Nvidia chips for AI model, report says
#215Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Whoa there, Bloomberg; just because the USA bans the sale of something to your country doesn't make it banned in your country. Many Americans, including their government, seem to think that US laws apply globally. They have extradited Ukrainian men from Poland because that Ukrainian was running a torrent website (illegal in the US, not illegal in Ukraine nor Poland). They tried getting an Australian extradited from…
The same government that runs Guantanamo prison, known for it's illegal torture practices and imprisoning people with no charges? Can't be!
When a US soldier was photographed in Vietnam waterboarding a vietnamese PoW he got 22 years of prison.
Then came 2002 and rule of law stopped applying.
Re: DeepSeek uses banned Nvidia chips for AI model, report says
#216Re: DeepSeek uses banned Nvidia chips for AI model, report says
#217Good. Unsurprising (well, known), but good. In fact, the world would be a better place if the US would not use their influence to try to keep other countries down.
"In fact, the world would be a better place if the US would not use their influence to try to keep other countries down." acting like china wouldn't doing the same thing to other country if they ever weld such position every great power would do the same thing to defend their position, its not unique to the US. only because current incumbent power is we see things this way
Re: DeepSeek uses banned Nvidia chips for AI model, report says
#218CIA disinformation campaigns notwithstanding, maybe accept global competition, open-source models, and the fact that whatever advantage OpenAI had was fleeting and mostly squandered at this point. The tendency of the rate of profit to fall is especially brutal if you've never made a profit.
Re: DeepSeek uses banned Nvidia chips for AI model, report says
#219Earlier quoted context omitted.
Google and Meta are probably the only two companies that have a right to license their training data For the sake of someone unfamiliar... Why is that? Did they pay teams of monkeys to generate their own, novel training data? Or gain explicit, opt-in permission from users who entrust them with their files/content?
> For the sake of someone unfamiliar... Why is that? I edited my comment, but basically they both own massive social media properties (YouTube, Instagram, Facebook) or file upload sites (Google Drive, Google Photos, Gmail) and their ToSes grant them these rights. You accept these terms when you use their services. That's not great, but we are getting free services. It's in the terms. It's a whole lot better than just…
Google most likely did something similar, just using books they already had indexed in Google Books, and probably by still seriously violating any reasonable notion of copyright
Re: DeepSeek uses banned Nvidia chips for AI model, report says
#220> chips that are banned in the country > The US bans the sale of these advanced semiconductors to China Whoa there, Bloomberg; just because the USA bans the sale of something to your country doesn't make it banned in your country.
I believe it is very much a two-way ban, depending on the specific chips [0]. [0]: https://www.aljazeera.com/economy/2025/9/17/china-bans-tech-...