Live data from Hacker News

EU Council Approves New "Chat Control" Mandate Pushing Mass Surveillance

reclaimthenet.org

211–220 of 449 posts

Re: EU Council Approves New "Chat Control" Mandate Pushing Mass Surveillance

#211

Suddenly it has become normal to scan face in 3D, nonchalantly demand copy of ID and passport, freeze people's money and demand full financial statement arbitrarily. Not only there is no push back but things are becoming more and more restrictive. Authorities and banks avalanche everyone within their reach over all available communication channels with "warnings" about scams and frauds. What direction are they aiming…

Yes I experienced this with FastSpring. Had a store with them for 15+ years, then suddenly they froze it and demanded all of the above. Was quite disturbing to say the least.

If you look up comments on fintechs, trading platforms, and even legit banks on reddit and review websites there has been surge of these practices in last maybe 12 months. Basically "all savings and accumulated funds are illegal by default". In the past I only had heard horror stories about Paypal but now this it widespread.

Re: EU Council Approves New "Chat Control" Mandate Pushing Mass Surveillance

#212
post #6

Even living nearby in the UK it blows my mind how quickly the EU proposes, kills and then revives and passes controversial legislation in such a short timeframe.

That's generally how the EU works, they forced Ireland to hold another referenda after the first one rejected the Lisbon treaty

The Irish people demanded concessions, got them.

Saying "forced" about this is like if someone offered me a job, me reading the offer and saying "can I do a 4-day week?", the company's response being "yes, here's a new contract for you to sign", and describing that second contract as "forced" on me.

Re: EU Council Approves New "Chat Control" Mandate Pushing Mass Surveillance

#213
post #81

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I guess it never hurts to try and find alternate ways of placating the US in order to make them get over their Greenland obession.

I don't care about Greenland one way or another, but I find it funny that the Europeans are so visibly upset about this when the Danish took the territory without permission themselves and are now crying that an even bigger thief might want to come take it from them.

This is 1814 we're talking about, right? That's only a decade after Louisiana Purchase just for reference and before the Mexican-American war. I guess we might as well give all that back to the Mexicans? You can play this game to the end of time. There's a reason for statute of limitations in law.

Re: EU Council Approves New "Chat Control" Mandate Pushing Mass Surveillance

#214
post #81

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't care about Greenland one way or another, but I find it funny that the Europeans are so visibly upset about this when the Danish took the territory without permission themselves and are now crying that an even bigger thief might want to come take it from them.

Meanwhile they turn a blind eye to Turkey taking Cyprus because they need Turkey on side for the migration crisis and Ukraine. Everyone operates on self-interest but not everyone is smug about it.

1814 vs 1974? seems a bit of a stretch. See above comment.

Re: EU Council Approves New "Chat Control" Mandate Pushing Mass Surveillance

#215
post #205

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This type of legislation should never ever be proposed in a democratic system, so had disagree. This is an extremely totalitarian-style move from EU - governing bodies are exempt from the law, meanwhile peasants have to be watched 24/7 for wrongthink, all under guise of protecting the children.

While I agree with the sentiment, you need to think like a state to stop this kind of thing. Even without any argument about personal rights and what's totalitarian, I can't even square the circle of the unstoppable force of "the economy is dependent on encryption that can't be hacked" with the immovable object of "hostile governments and organised criminals undermine ${insert any nation here} and communicate with lo…

Organized criminals (especially state actors) will find ways to communicate in the dark regardless, including just continuing to use illegal encryption.

Re: EU Council Approves New "Chat Control" Mandate Pushing Mass Surveillance

#216
post #106

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is of course a process, that does not lend itself to be democratic, because it is way longer than most people's attention span. People don't manage to remember things that happened in politics 4 years ago in their own country. Now they are required to follow up on dozens of shitty proposals, all probably illegal in their own country, and those don't even happen in their own country? That divides the number of pe…

People on average are really not that stupid and are absolutely capable of looking back a few years for context.

We clearly live in different worlds.

Re: EU Council Approves New "Chat Control" Mandate Pushing Mass Surveillance

#217
post #108

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Awareness of the reality, yes, but there's no reason to play people's emotions to get them "aware" of it - or in other words, get them angry about it.

Yes, there is. This shouldn't move forward at all, regardless of how many steps are involved and how small they are.

Anyone can and does say this about their pet favorite bit of legislation. And so journalists are more than happy to pull this shit with every other topic, too.

Re: EU Council Approves New "Chat Control" Mandate Pushing Mass Surveillance

#218
post #205

Earlier quoted context omitted.

While I agree with the sentiment, you need to think like a state to stop this kind of thing. Even without any argument about personal rights and what's totalitarian, I can't even square the circle of the unstoppable force of "the economy is dependent on encryption that can't be hacked" with the immovable object of "hostile governments and organised criminals undermine ${insert any nation here} and communicate with lo…

Organized criminals (especially state actors) will find ways to communicate in the dark regardless, including just continuing to use illegal encryption.

> including just continuing to use illegal encryption.

First, this can be made a crime by itself, and detected automatically because the mandatory back-doors fail.

Second, what gets talked about in public (the only thing any of us knows for sure, but also definitely not the whole picture) includes foreign governments recruiting locals via normal messenger apps.

More of a problem is that the back-doors can be exploited by both criminals and hostile powers.

Re: EU Council Approves New "Chat Control" Mandate Pushing Mass Surveillance

#219
post #81

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't care about Greenland one way or another, but I find it funny that the Europeans are so visibly upset about this when the Danish took the territory without permission themselves and are now crying that an even bigger thief might want to come take it from them.

This is 1814 we're talking about, right? That's only a decade after Louisiana Purchase just for reference and before the Mexican-American war. I guess we might as well give all that back to the Mexicans? You can play this game to the end of time. There's a reason for statute of limitations in law.

1953 is when Denmark asserted complete ownership of the territory and it ceased just being a "colony". That's not exactly ancient history.

Re: EU Council Approves New "Chat Control" Mandate Pushing Mass Surveillance

#220
post #150

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The purpose of the state is continuity of the state. The state is always the natural enemy of the people - specifically the liberty and privacy of the people. Any time you have a government, you will have a government that wishes to spy on you to make sure you will never attempt a competing government/army.

States are responsible for orders of magnitude more innocent human deaths than every "terrorist" group in human history combined.

They’re also responsible for the preservation of more human life and well being than any other organization.
Post reply on HN