Live data from Hacker News

Gem.coop

gem.coop

211–220 of 331 posts

Re: Gem.coop

#211

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Trustworthiness is far more important for a package manager. No amount of storage or bandwidth can compensate for an untrustworthy package manager.

With this is in place. A ".coop" domain does not signal trustworthiness. It's more like a childish revenge attempt. Don't get me wrong. I think it's a great idea for the original maintainers to begin work on a form. However, they could have chosen a better domain name.

Coop as in co-op, as in “co-operative”.

Re: Gem.coop

#212

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> This doesn't preclude extreme. Uhm yeah it literally does. Mainstream views can't be extreme by definition. You might not agree with them, but that's a different thing. > misunderstanding the difference of opinion in this way I haven't misunderstood anything.

> I haven't misunderstood anything. You have misunderstood why people use the term "extremism". > Mainstream views can't be extreme by definition. Of course they can; mainstream views can't be uncommon by definition. Extreme doesn't strictly mean uncommon (not even in a political context), it is also used to mean "high degree", which can include distance from political centrism but can also include, e.g. , frustratio…

> various online "challenges" like the "ice bucket challenge" are extreme

Ok I think you just have a very abnormal (extreme even?) definition of the word "extreme".

In a political context it literally means "far from the norm". His views are not far from the norm, as much as you might hate that. (I'm not a huge fan either but I'm not going to distort reality to make myself feel better.)

Re: Gem.coop

#213

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> he has written some other really vile things about transgender people. Do you have a link? I suspect these "really vile things" will turn out to be not so vile (like JKR), just things you don't agree with. > I'd like to leave my identity home and discuss software engineering and interesting technical ideas. DHH has made that impossible. Really? Did he talk about politics at this Ruby conference? Seems like it is yo…

> I suspect these "really vile things" will turn out to be not so vile (like JKR) "Not so vile" things like spreading lies about a female Olymics Boxer's gender, calling her terrible names, and inciting her online followers to harass her? She not only bullies transgender individuals but also targets other women who don't meet her own standards of femininity. If you have no problems with people like that, no wonder yo…

Again, link? It's no good just talking about what heinous things someone has done. That kind of talk is always incredibly unreliable.

Re: Gem.coop

#214

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Ironic that DHH is politically active enough that it affects his day to day activities and public perception of his company - kind of the exact opposite of his own policy he expects his employees to abide by.

He posts about it on his personal blog, not on his company Slack.

Is world.hey.com/dhh a personal blog? It's literally on his company's domain... At least in the company slack your fash opinions would reach just your poor colleagues...

Re: Gem.coop

#215
post #130

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The main page itself provides little to no info so I’m going to make a few assumptions that, to me, seem logical: 1. It must depend on RubyGems in order to stay in sync, because people publish to RubyGems. 2. It has no UI to search or view gems, so still depends on RubyGems for that. Ignoring any question about technical detail or implementation: there is zero practical reason or motivation to switch unless I am ideo…

True, but this is a new beginning.Give time and credit to build an alternative. I think another repo server will not harm anyone in the long run

[deleted]

Re: Gem.coop

#216
post #118

Just a thought of mine: why don’t we switch fully to git? Commit signing, tag signing, Decentralize. Doesn’t that sound like a good alternativ?

You've seen golang's package... situation?... and you still think switching to Git is a good idea?

Re: Gem.coop

#217
post #118

Just a thought of mine: why don’t we switch fully to git? Commit signing, tag signing, Decentralize. Doesn’t that sound like a good alternativ?

Exactly. Go already adopts that.

Re: Gem.coop

#218
post #118

Just a thought of mine: why don’t we switch fully to git? Commit signing, tag signing, Decentralize. Doesn’t that sound like a good alternativ?

You've seen golang's package... situation?... and you still think switching to Git is a good idea?

What "situation"?

Re: Gem.coop

#219

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> but silence is a form of opinion, of vote, of approval. I disagree. We don't have to have an opinion on everything. And what worries me is those (both on the left and on the right) who think that silence is a form of opinion or approval. It's getting very close to "those who are not with us are against us". And that's a worldview I have very little time for.

> that's a worldview I have very little time for Only people who already live in a position of privilege get to have "little time" and settle for worldviews which advocate for a sort of bland tolerance of extremism. I can assure you, for people who are being actively harmed by hateful rhetoric and political policies, "those who are not with us are against us" is absolutely a reality.

Extremism is in the eye of the beholder. Trying to kick a founder out of a hugely successful project because he thinks there has been too much immigration to London is also an extremist view.

Re: Gem.coop

#220

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> he has written some other really vile things about transgender people. Do you have a link? I suspect these "really vile things" will turn out to be not so vile (like JKR), just things you don't agree with. > I'd like to leave my identity home and discuss software engineering and interesting technical ideas. DHH has made that impossible. Really? Did he talk about politics at this Ruby conference? Seems like it is yo…

> I suspect these "really vile things" will turn out to be not so vile (like JKR) "Not so vile" things like spreading lies about a female Olymics Boxer's gender, calling her terrible names, and inciting her online followers to harass her? She not only bullies transgender individuals but also targets other women who don't meet her own standards of femininity. If you have no problems with people like that, no wonder yo…

[flagged]
Post reply on HN