Earlier quoted context omitted.
> mild conservative lean you're whitewashing that he's racist
Do you have a source for this? Also, do you watch his podcast? His host (who's literally also one of his employees) is a black woman. Not proof he's not racist, but suggests probably not. Unless you just assume anyone to the right of you equals racist, which lots of leftists do. Which is one of many reasons why the global right is rising...
Ruby Central's Attack on RubyGems [pdf]
211–220 of 286 posts
Re: Ruby Central's Attack on RubyGems [pdf]
#212Re: Ruby Central's Attack on RubyGems [pdf]
#213Earlier quoted context omitted.
Rhiannon worked with Ruby Central for a bit, left a few weeks ago, and just shared this: https://bsky.app/profile/rhiannon.io/post/3lz6zcflg2s26
Post not found, what did it say?
Deleted my post, which I published before Ruby central released their blog explaining things.
It’s ultimately not my place to say or speculate about what’s going on.
It’s obviously a disastrously bad roll out or whatever is happening and I hope they are able to make things right w the community.
Re: Ruby Central's Attack on RubyGems [pdf]
#214Earlier quoted context omitted.
> mild conservative lean you're whitewashing that he's racist
Is he? I use Ruby and Rails, but I don't pay much attention to DHH so this is news to me. Would you mind pointing me to a source for this?
Re: Ruby Central's Attack on RubyGems [pdf]
#215Re: Ruby Central's Attack on RubyGems [pdf]
#216The project is an objective public-good. It's sad that a former employee is attempting to burn it all down. I guess they thought it was all about them and not the millions of DAU's the platform has served without fail since inception. Contractors will come and go.
What are the OPs contributions even? I don't see a single commit from her handle on the 24 month view (below). Correct me if I'm wrong.
https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems.org/graphs/contributors...
Re: Ruby Central's Attack on RubyGems [pdf]
#217Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Inaction is a manifestation of one of two things: ignorance, or conscious decision to not act. Under which of these categories would you classify the following assertion: > As much as I've learned about subject X, I still feel that neither I — nor most people who are already acting, for that matter — truly have enough information to take an informed stance here, as the waters are being actively clouded by propagand…
> I also do not highly prioritize gaining any more information about the situation You acknowledge your ignorance and then refuse to remedy that. This is an act. Perfectly acceptable and understandable. But what is more important it's deliberate and you accept responsibility for any and all consequences. > I suppose I may differ from the average person in at least one way — that being that, if I were tricked into har…
They did not say this. They said they would not highly prioritize it. Which is, of course, reasonable: given two topics, I have little metric to prioritize learning about one over the other. I have no way to know that I am prioritizing my research adequately.
Re: Ruby Central's Attack on RubyGems [pdf]
#218Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
[flagged]
If you don't believe that's the case, then tell me exactly what that phrase means other than to exclude some group. To claim "these are not real Americans".
Re: Ruby Central's Attack on RubyGems [pdf]
#219Earlier quoted context omitted.
Do you have a source for this? Also, do you watch his podcast? His host (who's literally also one of his employees) is a black woman. Not proof he's not racist, but suggests probably not. Unless you just assume anyone to the right of you equals racist, which lots of leftists do. Which is one of many reasons why the global right is rising...
https://world.hey.com/dhh/as-i-remember-london-e7d38e64
Re: Ruby Central's Attack on RubyGems [pdf]
#220I took comfort in the fact that the ruby community seemed miraculously immune from these petty disputes and takeovers from the benevolent entity running the service. Seems like that’s not the case anymore :( Sorry for all the maintainers, that must suck.
I miss the days of "we're nice because matz is nice"