Live data from Hacker News

The staff ate it later

en.wikipedia.org

211–220 of 313 posts

Re: The staff ate it later

#211

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You're engaging in a decadent activity (watching TV) that "wastes" all kinds of resources but are worried about this one in particular (food) even though we have more than enough of it to go around?

Yes. Ish. I also think that whataboutism is cheap. I disagree that it'S 'more than enough' and that 'more than enough' is a good reason to waste resources.

It's not whataboutism if what you are worrying about is a drop in the bucket of overall waste.

Re: The staff ate it later

#212

In the west we have “No Animals Were Harmed in the making of …”, which I’m only just learning comes from the American Humane Society: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Humane_Society#No_A... I had always thought it were a generic phrase!

Certified for free for SAG union productions (funded by the union at $1200/day). A perk of unionized production

Re: The staff ate it later

#214

this seems to be making its way to western shows as well - when taskmaster has a food based challenge, they often include a reassurance that the food didn't go to waste. and i've seen similar on some youtube shows. for example: https://youtu.be/_gNZR5IEsAA?si=x5nvoBzC9Xc4fxFs&t=1674

I hope they don't make the staff finish off stuff, like Marmite and porridge ice cream, which makes all the contestants gag.

A more practical approach in this case, where the concerns are probably slightly different than what we see in the article, is probably a (monetary) donation to a food bank.

Re: The staff ate it later

#215

I wish they put this on screen in Germany, too (though in German, maybe, instead of Japanese). In cooking shows, I always fear they throw the food in the gargabe. With that note on the screen, if they do throw it in the garbage, at least they would be evil liars. Which might be less likely, and so I could feel better.

Food waste is utterly meaningless to the environmental cost of producing and streaming a TV show.

For instance, streaming anything in 4k takes an enormous amount of water and energy.

Re: The staff ate it later

#216

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Also a matter of purpose, killing animals for food is more acceptable than killing them for sport or entertainment

Exactly this. Meat is a huge source of nutrition. Even though in our modern western society, we might not "need" to eat meat, but it's a hearty, plentiful, accessible protein and fat that stores well and can be easily moved and replicated quickly. It's simply much more practical still to keep eating meat in much of the world. I'm not going to go into the arguments about our biology either, but I think it's safe to sa…

Eating Grandma is actually a really good way to get parasites and prion diseases, so there's more to it than just cultural acceptability. The reason we don't risk parasites from farmed meat is because it's dewormed and treated and inspected and cleaned.

Re: The staff ate it later

#217
post #62

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's rumored that God was wary of humans having apple products.

Perhaps because of the temptations of walled gardens?

Their icon is also an apple with bite out of it, if they wanted to be the prefered OS of the divine they should have chosen better.

Re: The staff ate it later

#218
post #84

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> feta has limited applications. Politely beg to differ.

It's not particularly sliceable, meltable, or all that edible on its own. That rules out many cheese applications for me. Then again, I'm French, so our takes on cheese may be very different! :)

Try buying it brined.

Re: The staff ate it later

#219
post #161

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not sure what the quote has to do with anything here, but it's a as good an opportunity as ever to say that large parts of the "Old Testament" draw most of its inspiration from the code of Hammurabi ("an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth"), the Epic of Gilgamesh (which gave us, notably, the story of the deluge, and the dark role of the serpent) and Ancient Egypt, to which it owes, among many others, the concept of…

"Magi" were priests of Zoraster. It is true that our current word for magic is derived from this root but that doesn't mean that the text is saying they were _magicians_.

> "Magi" were priests of Zoraster

That's the etymology of the word, but there is no indication in the gospel of Matthew (the only one to even mention this) that it's a reference to Persia.

That would be like saying when anyone who mentions "algorithm" is really talking about Uzbekistan, because al-Ḵwārizmī means 'the man of Ḵwārizm' (now Khiva).

Re: The staff ate it later

#220
post #161
post #2

> Then Pharaoh also called for the wise men and the sorcerers, and they also, the magicians of Egypt, did the same with their secret arts. For each one threw down his staff and they turned into serpents. But Aaron’s staff swallowed up their staffs. - Exodus 7:1-12 (NIV) Many moons ago I had a girlfriend who worked on an nationally broadcast afternoon show where they often had guest chefs demonstrating dishes, so I wo…

Not sure what the quote has to do with anything here, but it's a as good an opportunity as ever to say that large parts of the "Old Testament" draw most of its inspiration from the code of Hammurabi ("an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth"), the Epic of Gilgamesh (which gave us, notably, the story of the deluge, and the dark role of the serpent) and Ancient Egypt, to which it owes, among many others, the concept of…

Not that great of an opportunity, to be honest
Post reply on HN