Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Paracetamol disrupts early embryogenesis by cell cycle inhibition

academic.oup.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

211–217 of 217 posts

Re: Paracetamol disrupts early embryogenesis by cell cycle inhibition

#211

Post by littlestymaar »

nikolay wrote: post #210
littlestymaar wrote: post #209

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Literally no kids of a mid-size town in Bulgaria had no head injury riding a bike w/o helmet since I was kid This is BS, any kid could have had one and you simply wouldn't have known it, especially as a kid. Even if some kid died, your parents would likely have been aware of that, but kids around likely wouldn't have, unless they were in the same class or otherwise knew the victim personally. (Simple exercise, chec…

You assume and don't research. There are studies that show that the more your trust kids to be on their own, the lesser the injuries. Yes, the first Pfizer booster was never tested on humans - it's a known fact!

> You assume and don't research.

Oh god, the typical “do your own research”. Is it HN or a random Facebook group? I thought people had a scientific background here, but apparently not everyone has one…

> There are studies that show that the more your trust kids to be on their own, the lesser the injuries

Trusting your kids != don't wear helmets. Note that it doesn't mean you shouldn't give medications to your kids either.

Yes there are overprotective parents that are toxic to their children, but that doesn't mean we need to go full new-age bullshit like you are.

> Yes, the first Pfizer booster was never tested on humans - it's a known fact!

I don't know who “knows” it, but it's completely made up…

Re: Paracetamol disrupts early embryogenesis by cell cycle inhibition

#212

Post by nikolay »

littlestymaar wrote: post #211
nikolay wrote: post #210

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You assume and don't research. There are studies that show that the more your trust kids to be on their own, the lesser the injuries. Yes, the first Pfizer booster was never tested on humans - it's a known fact!

> You assume and don't research. Oh god, the typical “do your own research”. Is it HN or a random Facebook group? I thought people had a scientific background here, but apparently not everyone has one… > There are studies that show that the more your trust kids to be on their own, the lesser the injuries Trusting your kids != don't wear helmets. Note that it doesn't mean you shouldn't give medications to your kids ei…

Yes, FDA confirmed the first booster was only tested on mice [0].

[0]: https://www.newsweek.com/covid-booster-tested-mice-what-we-k...

Re: Paracetamol disrupts early embryogenesis by cell cycle inhibition

#213

Post by littlestymaar »

nikolay wrote: post #212
littlestymaar wrote: post #211

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> You assume and don't research. Oh god, the typical “do your own research”. Is it HN or a random Facebook group? I thought people had a scientific background here, but apparently not everyone has one… > There are studies that show that the more your trust kids to be on their own, the lesser the injuries Trusting your kids != don't wear helmets. Note that it doesn't mean you shouldn't give medications to your kids ei…

Yes, FDA confirmed the first booster was only tested on mice [0]. [0]: https://www.newsweek.com/covid-booster-tested-mice-what-we-k...

Ah I see now, lack of reading proficiency + Newsweek sensationalist title got you confused.

It's written down here:

> new boosters use the same technology and process as the previous vaccines

It's just the same vaccine by FDA's standards and it has indeed been tested on hundreds of thousands of human test subjects.

Now explain how it's relevant to you and your kids not being dead yet?

Re: Paracetamol disrupts early embryogenesis by cell cycle inhibition

#214

Post by nikolay »

littlestymaar wrote: post #213
nikolay wrote: post #212

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes, FDA confirmed the first booster was only tested on mice [0]. [0]: https://www.newsweek.com/covid-booster-tested-mice-what-we-k...

Ah I see now, lack of reading proficiency + Newsweek sensationalist title got you confused. It's written down here: > new boosters use the same technology and process as the previous vaccines It's just the same vaccine by FDA's standards and it has indeed been tested on hundreds of thousands of human test subjects. Now explain how it's relevant to you and your kids not being dead yet?

The technology is the same, but not the vaccine. We test drugs, not drug technologies! Others, then all classic vaccines should not be tested as there are just a couple of vaccine technologies in use before mRNA vaccines.

This was all over the news that before releasing to the public, it was ONLY tested on mice. And then there was a public uproar. And then people stop using these untested toxic substances.

Re: Paracetamol disrupts early embryogenesis by cell cycle inhibition

#215

Post by littlestymaar »

nikolay wrote: post #214
littlestymaar wrote: post #213

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Ah I see now, lack of reading proficiency + Newsweek sensationalist title got you confused. It's written down here: > new boosters use the same technology and process as the previous vaccines It's just the same vaccine by FDA's standards and it has indeed been tested on hundreds of thousands of human test subjects. Now explain how it's relevant to you and your kids not being dead yet?

The technology is the same, but not the vaccine. We test drugs, not drug technologies! Others, then all classic vaccines should not be tested as there are just a couple of vaccine technologies in use before mRNA vaccines. This was all over the news that before releasing to the public, it was ONLY tested on mice. And then there was a public uproar. And then people stop using these untested toxic substances.

> The technology is the same, but not the vaccine. We test drugs, not drug technologies!

Of course we test technology, you cannot individually test each dose of vaccine! You check that the vaccine production is able to produce consistent output, and then you test a few thousand doses and then extrapolate from there. What you've tested is the particular technology being used to produce the said vaccine.

> Others, then all classic vaccines should not be tested as there are just a couple of vaccine technologies in use before mRNA vaccines

Not if you define technology like you did above: if each exact formulation of a vaccine is a “technology”, then there are as many “technologies” as commercialized vaccines (which is the correct call, they all have their own patents and other IP associated to the vaccine). The concept of “mRNA vaccine” cannot be patented, each exact formulation can, and that's what reused between the first dose and the booster.

> And then people stop using these untested toxic substances.

Sad news is that half million people idiotic enough to call these “untested” and “toxic substance” have died. On the flip side they have been evicted from the gene pool now.

Feel free not to vaccinate you or your children, you're helping natural selection do its job.

Re: Paracetamol disrupts early embryogenesis by cell cycle inhibition

#216

Post by nikolay »

littlestymaar wrote: post #215
nikolay wrote: post #214

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The technology is the same, but not the vaccine. We test drugs, not drug technologies! Others, then all classic vaccines should not be tested as there are just a couple of vaccine technologies in use before mRNA vaccines. This was all over the news that before releasing to the public, it was ONLY tested on mice. And then there was a public uproar. And then people stop using these untested toxic substances.

> The technology is the same, but not the vaccine. We test drugs, not drug technologies! Of course we test technology, you cannot individually test each dose of vaccine! You check that the vaccine production is able to produce consistent output, and then you test a few thousand doses and then extrapolate from there. What you've tested is the particular technology being used to produce the said vaccine. > Others, then…

It's not well-known, but many people died from ventilators or improper, or rather chaotic, treatment. Vaccine injury is real, it's scientifically validated, and it has injured and killed more people than COVID-19! Myocarditis is not reversible, and no wonder so many young people suddenly died from CVDs without prior history.

Re: Paracetamol disrupts early embryogenesis by cell cycle inhibition

#217

Post by littlestymaar »

nikolay wrote: post #216
littlestymaar wrote: post #215

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> The technology is the same, but not the vaccine. We test drugs, not drug technologies! Of course we test technology, you cannot individually test each dose of vaccine! You check that the vaccine production is able to produce consistent output, and then you test a few thousand doses and then extrapolate from there. What you've tested is the particular technology being used to produce the said vaccine. > Others, then…

It's not well-known, but many people died from ventilators or improper, or rather chaotic, treatment. Vaccine injury is real, it's scientifically validated, and it has injured and killed more people than COVID-19! Myocarditis is not reversible, and no wonder so many young people suddenly died from CVDs without prior history.

> Vaccine injury is real, it's scientifically validated

Yes, vaccines, like all medicine have adverse side effects sometimes.

> and it has injured and killed more people than COVID-19

This is bollocks. Vaccines have possibly killed a few thousand people, when the disease's death toll is counted in millions. Same for nonlethal problems.

> Myocarditis is not reversible, and no wonder so many young people suddenly died from CVDs without prior history.

Yup, Myocarditis and other cardiac problems are one of the most common serious consequences of COVID-19…

Again the prevalence of those is much worse among non-vaccinated than among vaccinated, even though the vaccine like the disease is a risk factor (but much less than the virus).

It's surprising to see Facebook antivax groups narrative popping up on HN…

Post reply on HN