Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I'm turned off by big ugly blocks with childish straps.. is there anything remotely attractive?
You can't get much sleeker with a smartwatch than the apple watch, square shape aside, it's neither childish nor ugly.
I bought a £16 smartwatch just because it used USB-C
211–220 of 248 posts
Re: I bought a £16 smartwatch just because it used USB-C
#212Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I'm turned off by big ugly blocks with childish straps.. is there anything remotely attractive?
You can't get much sleeker with a smartwatch than the apple watch, square shape aside, it's neither childish nor ugly.
Re: I bought a £16 smartwatch just because it used USB-C
#213Earlier quoted context omitted.
It wouldn't fly and/or would be "one more SKU" to support with expensive software development. They've seriously stuck themselves in a pickle with their WatchOS offering. They can't move away from touch-screen b/c they've committed to "being able to enter a PIN" from the device (so they can offer AND PROTECT on-watch payment capabilities). They can't move away from touch-screen b/c they've duped all the uber's and do…
This cheap device is also touchscreen. Only single point though - no idea if Apple is multi touch.
Which relates to the cost and battery life of the Apple Watch, it's a mainstream device that many people with varying disabilities can use. It has a full-fledged screen reader in its operating system, in addition to the development costs to support multiple interaction modalities, some will not be achievable with lower-powered, less specialized processors.
Re: I bought a £16 smartwatch just because it used USB-C
#214Earlier quoted context omitted.
I was also a happy Garmin Instinct Solar user. It is until after two years it started to turn off whenever it vibrates. I disabled vibrations, but it's reduced to an expensive step counter now.
Were the vibrations actually useful? I have an old Garmin something or other on my wrist right now, and I disabled vibrations because unless I'm sitting around doing nothing and I can hear them, I'd never notice them.
Re: I bought a £16 smartwatch just because it used USB-C
#215> "I plugged it until fully charged, then wore it conti> nuously. After 24 hours of use, even with all my fiddling, that battery was at 80%. After four days, it still had 40% left"* So if a £16 generic competitor can last 4 days, what's Apple doing wrong? Why can't a £450 Apple Watch (non-Ultra) last a full 24 hours on a charge?
WTF Apple watches cost $450? You can't even run a text editor on it! What are people buying?
Comparing the flagship model to the much cheaper SE, what they're buying is:
* a larger, brighter, always-on display * additional health sensors, monitoring * can go deeper underwater * longer battery life (if you choose low power mode) * faster battery charging * more powerful processor * twice the local storage * Ultra wideband radio (enables directional device finding) * microphone with voice isolation (better sounding calls, voice recordings) * made from more recycled materials (which may make it more expensive)
I'm happy with my non-cellular SE, I do which charging was faster but I don't know the Series 10 charges that much faster and I wouldn't pay an extra ~$150 for that anyway.
Re: I bought a £16 smartwatch just because it used USB-C
#216Earlier quoted context omitted.
I was also a happy Garmin Instinct Solar user. It is until after two years it started to turn off whenever it vibrates. I disabled vibrations, but it's reduced to an expensive step counter now.
Seems like a battery issue. Probably the vibration draws too much current and the battery just drops its voltage. Have you tried changing the battery?
I contacted Garmin support since I've seen that in some of the cases they offered generous discounts for newer models or even gave them for free, but in my case they offered me to pay almost a full price for refurbished Instinct Solar gen 1, that most probably would have the same issue after some time.
Re: I bought a £16 smartwatch just because it used USB-C
#217As someone who loathes jewelry on myself and has no interest in the watch culture, nonetheless I have an interest in smart watches I can monitor things with. I'm turned off by big ugly blocks with childish straps.. is there anything remotely attractive?
https://www.crowdsupply.com/oddly-specific-objects/sensor-wa...
Re: I bought a £16 smartwatch just because it used USB-C
#218Re: I bought a £16 smartwatch just because it used USB-C
#219People get surprised how cheap things really can be when they see aliexpress, and the assumption is crap. I bought a ton of stuff from aliexpress, and very rarely-if any- was crappy.
AliExpress prices don't include shipping, which are effectively baked into Amazon's pricing to cover SuperSaver & Prime customers.
I bought a lot of 5-10$ things that costs more than 3 times on amazon.
Aliexpress is much cheaper even if you include shipping if there's separate shipping fee.
Amazon is convenient for speed + returns.
Re: I bought a £16 smartwatch just because it used USB-C
#220People get surprised how cheap things really can be when they see aliexpress, and the assumption is crap. I bought a ton of stuff from aliexpress, and very rarely-if any- was crappy.
What I've learnt from BigClive on YouTube is don't buy anything that plugs into the wall. If it's low voltage then you should be fine. I'd still be wary of large lithium ion batteries, though.
I probably would hesitate to buy large-battery-powered things from them, for now. Like e-bike etc. Also would hesitate to replace my circuit breakers with zigbee circuit breakers that can also measure power real time, for example.
But there are a lot of good quality stuff that doesn't fit into the dangerous category.
I bought a lot of sensors/smart home stuff, small home stuff like drip irrigation tubes/drip heads, apple find-my compatible trackers, poe cameras, 80x80 fans, label maker tape, poe extender etc.