Live data from Hacker News

Google's shortened goo.gl links will stop working next month

theverge.com

211–220 of 236 posts

Re: Google's shortened goo.gl links will stop working next month

#211
post #126

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Adding an external service so you don’t have to store a few hundred bytes is wild, particularly within a pdf.

It's not the bytes. It's the fact that it's likely gonna be printed in a paper journal, where you can't click the link.

That’s an even worse reason to use a temporary redirection service. If you really need to, put in both.

Re: Google's shortened goo.gl links will stop working next month

#212
post #37
post #2

About 60k academic citations about to die - https://scholar.google.com/scholar?start=90&q=%22https://goo... Countless books with irrevocably broken references - https://www.google.com/search?q=%22://goo.gl%22&sca_upv=1&sc... And for what? The cost of keeping a few TB online and a little bit of CPU power? An absolute act of cultural vandalism.

For people wanting to include URL references in things like books, what’s the right approach to take today? I’m genuinely asking. It seems like its hard to trust that any service will remaining running for decades

What's the right approach to take for referencing anything that isn't preserved in an institution like the Library of Congress?

Say the interview of a person, a niche publication, a local pamphlet?

Maybe to certify that your article is of a certain level of credibility you need to manually preserve all the cited works yourself in an approved way.

Re: Google's shortened goo.gl links will stop working next month

#213
post #61
post #51

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Don't be confused! That's not how they made the decision; it's how they're selling it.

So how did they decide?

They launched Firebase Dynamic Links and someone didn't like the overlap.

Re: Google's shortened goo.gl links will stop working next month

#215

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> It wasn't a good idea to use shortened links in a citation in the first place, and somebody should have explained that to the authors. They didn't publish a book or write an academic paper in a vacuum - somebody around them should have known better and said something. It's a great idea, and today in 2025, papers are pretty much the only place where using these shortened URLs makes a lot of sense. In almost any othe…

Even normal HTTP URLs aren't great. If there was ever a case for content-addressable networks like IPFS it's this. Universities should be able to host this data in a decentralized way.

A DOI handle type of thing could certainly point to an IPFS address. I can't speak to how you'd do truly decentralized access to the DOI handle. At some point DNS is a thing and somebody needs to host the handle.

Re: Google's shortened goo.gl links will stop working next month

#216
post #2

About 60k academic citations about to die - https://scholar.google.com/scholar?start=90&q=%22https://goo... Countless books with irrevocably broken references - https://www.google.com/search?q=%22://goo.gl%22&sca_upv=1&sc... And for what? The cost of keeping a few TB online and a little bit of CPU power? An absolute act of cultural vandalism.

https://wiki.archiveteam.org/index.php/Goo.gl https://tracker.archiveteam.org/goo-gl/ (1.66B work items remaining as of this comment) How to run an ArchiveTeam warrior: https://wiki.archiveteam.org/index.php/ArchiveTeam_Warrior (edit: i see jaydenmilne commented about this further down thread, mea culpa)

For those in the now, is this heavy on disk usage? Should I install this on my disk drive or my SSD? Just want to avoid tons of disk writes on an SSD if it's unnecessary.

Re: Google's shortened goo.gl links will stop working next month

#217
Link shortener in read-only mode should be very cheap to run (highly available writes can be expensive in a distributes system but it's easier to make a read-only system work efficient).

They are saving pennies but reminding everyone one more time that Google cannot be relied upon.

Re: Google's shortened goo.gl links will stop working next month

#218
post #195

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This kind of luddite behavior sometimes makes using this site exhausting. We have many paper documents from over 1,000 years ago. The vast majority of what was on the internet 25 years ago is gone forever.

What a weird comparison. Do we have the vast majority of paper documents from 1,000 years ago?

We certainly have more paper documents from 1000 years ago than PDFs from 1000 years ago! Clearly that's the fault of the PDFs.

Re: Google's shortened goo.gl links will stop working next month

#219
post #150

Earlier quoted context omitted.

IMO it's less Google's fault and more a crappy tech education problem. It wasn't a good idea to use shortened links in a citation in the first place, and somebody should have explained that to the authors. They didn't publish a book or write an academic paper in a vacuum - somebody around them should have known better and said something. And really it's not much different than anything else online - it can disappear…

Ahh classic free market cop out.

Free market is a euphemism for “there’s no physics demanding this be worked on”

If you want it archived do it. You seem to want someone else to take up your concerns.

An HN genius should be able to crawl this and fix it.

But you’re not geniuses. They’re too busy to be low affect whiners on social media.

Re: Google's shortened goo.gl links will stop working next month

#220
post #150

Earlier quoted context omitted.

IMO it's less Google's fault and more a crappy tech education problem. It wasn't a good idea to use shortened links in a citation in the first place, and somebody should have explained that to the authors. They didn't publish a book or write an academic paper in a vacuum - somebody around them should have known better and said something. And really it's not much different than anything else online - it can disappear…

Ahh classic free market cop out.

Well, is the free market going anywhere?

Who's lost out at the end of the day? People who didn't understand the free market and lost access to these "free" services? Or people who knew what would happen and avoided them? My links are still working...

There are digital public goods (like Wikipedia) that are intended to stick around forever with free access, but Google isn't one of them.

Post reply on HN