Live data from Hacker News

YouTube's new anti-adblock measures

iter.ca

211–220 of 1001 posts

Re: YouTube's new anti-adblock measures

#211
> This locks a few global objects by using Object.defineProperty to set them as non-writable, which prevents later code from overwriting them with a Proxy that alters their behaviour. So uBlock Origin can only proxy JSON.stringify if it can run before this locker script does.

This seems like a bug in browsers, or possibly in the spec. Page content and scripts should never be able to restrict what browser extensions can do.

Re: YouTube's new anti-adblock measures

#212
post #193

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Paying for YT doesn't remove the ads. On the other hand, the golden era of YouTube has passed. You aren't losing out on much if you simply stop using it.

Youtube premium does remove all Google's ads. Obviously not the ads the content creator has put into the video itself.

There's an add-on called sponsor block, which works remarkably well, that will just skip sponsored ads inside videos.

Re: YouTube's new anti-adblock measures

#213

Thank you for your important work fighting this battle, it must be exhausting. The more Google insists on forcing advertising on us, the more we should look closely at the wildly inappropriate and downright scammy ads they are hosting. If they can't leave well enough alone and look the other way on ad blocking, (which is the only way to avoid exposing myself and family to these dangerous ads), they need to be under a…

> The more Google insists on forcing advertising on us...

You can... just not visit youtube, right?

Re: YouTube's new anti-adblock measures

#214
post #156

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Once we get content-aware AI adblocking, every video and podcast will turn into a product placement.

I use content aware ad blocking to remove inserted and native ads from podcasts. The next level adblocking will be rewriting content that is overly commercial.

got any links to set this up?

Re: YouTube's new anti-adblock measures

#215

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You could just pay the $13/month? Would save the worries about context switching further taxing your already high cognitive load? And I would expect your high cognitive load helps you earn well above $13/month?

Paying for YT doesn't remove the ads. On the other hand, the golden era of YouTube has passed. You aren't losing out on much if you simply stop using it.

There is too much good content on YouTube to simply stop using it. It is a gold mine of tutorials on niche subjects. I just watched best ways to patch an air mattress, and a video on making theater quality popcorn! (and it was delicious)

Re: YouTube's new anti-adblock measures

#216
post #213

Thank you for your important work fighting this battle, it must be exhausting. The more Google insists on forcing advertising on us, the more we should look closely at the wildly inappropriate and downright scammy ads they are hosting. If they can't leave well enough alone and look the other way on ad blocking, (which is the only way to avoid exposing myself and family to these dangerous ads), they need to be under a…

> The more Google insists on forcing advertising on us... You can... just not visit youtube, right?

I'm going to assume thats much more difficult than one would expect.

Re: YouTube's new anti-adblock measures

#217

I get they want to work against ad blockers, but as a Premium member I really wish there was an easy way to watch a video without it polluting my history or recommendations. I don't want to watch ads just due to that.

Just delete it from watch history when your done, is what I do.

Re: YouTube's new anti-adblock measures

#218

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Out of curiosity I clicked the link and it is funny how they try to blame the extension when is them actually causing the problem.

The extension is stealing from them. I get stealing a zero marginal cost good is minor but the agreement you make with YouTube is that you watch an ad in exchange for the video. Why should they serve you the video if you refuse your part of the agreement?

I've never said they should, they are free to implement any anti-ad-block for all I care. I just pointed out their lack of honesty about the source of the problem, they should say they are actively blocking the extension rather than the extension is malfunctioning.

Re: YouTube's new anti-adblock measures

#219
post #213

Thank you for your important work fighting this battle, it must be exhausting. The more Google insists on forcing advertising on us, the more we should look closely at the wildly inappropriate and downright scammy ads they are hosting. If they can't leave well enough alone and look the other way on ad blocking, (which is the only way to avoid exposing myself and family to these dangerous ads), they need to be under a…

> The more Google insists on forcing advertising on us... You can... just not visit youtube, right?

They're a monopoly benefiting from network effects.

Re: YouTube's new anti-adblock measures

#220
post #197

I'm more than happy to pay for Youtube Premium to remove ads for all the family and ensure content creators can monetize their work.

I find it hard to discern whether your post is sarcasm. Assuming it’s not, I’m surprised that someone is so cheerfully and voluntarily paying an extra fiat to the virtual landowner.
Post reply on HN