Live data from Hacker News

The Who Cares Era

dansinker.com

211–220 of 765 posts

Re: The Who Cares Era

#211

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Was Yugoslavia an economic powerhouse?

Being an economic powerhouse or not isn't required for the idea to be a reasonable and workable one. But given the high levels of dysfunction/conflict that led to the breakup of the country, I doubt they'd meet whatever bar you set for "economic powerhouse".

> the high levels of dysfunction/conflict

Doesn't sound like Yugoslavia had a successful model.

Re: The Who Cares Era

#212
post #149

I read the title and it triggered something I've been thinking a lot lately: there's too much for everyone to care about right now. Article didn't really touch on it directly, but: > something that sounded like every other thing: some dude talking to some other dude about apps that some third dude would half-listen-to at 2x speed while texting a fourth dude about plans for later. It's not that the dudes don't care, i…

[flagged]

Or they offshored the project and fired people, and are bringing it back, and now you have to deal with that mess

Your potential reward for fixing all of it and reminding them to not do it again? Nothing!

Re: The Who Cares Era

#213

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Boeing consistently went up for many decades prior to the MAX crisis. So did GE. Companies have life cycles. They grow until they become unable to function efficiently anymore, then they go down. It's not about prioritizing short term results.

Boeing has consistently underperformed the market massively since the MD merger. Making maybe 3% after inflation

The vast bulk of Boeing's history was before that.

Re: The Who Cares Era

#214
post #185

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> it's all due to the focus on short-term financial results I've heard that my whole life. If that were generally true, company stocks would be going steadily downwards.

There is no contradiction between stocks going up and things being mediocre due to focus on short-term profits.

Looks like a contradiction to me. If you're sacrificing the long term for the short term, your stock isn't going up.

Re: The Who Cares Era

#215

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The solution to this is worker's self-management, an economic model that was pioneered by Yugoslavia, but has mostly disappeared with its dismantlement. Any company with more than five employees had to be run as a worker-run coop. The board and execs were elected by the workers. Companies still competed on the market. This would solve for the problem of alienation while still having an environment of competition.

Was Yugoslavia an economic powerhouse?

[deleted]

Re: The Who Cares Era

#216
post #4

Sadly, this seems to be the case, but I'm not so sure that it's new. I think "If it's worth doing; it's worth doing half-assed." is a personal working philosophy that is probably thousands of years old. It's just that now, we have better tools for half-assing it.

We have better tools but are usually forced to stay for the same 8 hours it used to take

Yeah. Despite gains in productivity, we've had the same 40 hour work week for what seems like forever, and all the monetary gains have gone to capital instead of labor.

Re: The Who Cares Era

#217

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I did some business with the a city department at one time. I discovered that from Thanksgiving to New Years, no work was done at that department. Everyone was "out of the office" or will "be back later".

This is only an example of people being bad at their jobs or not caring if you are referring to the management/administration responsible for staffing and scheduling over that time period. The people who are actually out of the office are presumably using approved PTO.

Sure. LOL.

Re: The Who Cares Era

#218
post #191

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Do we need economic powerhouses to live well?

Yes. Or would you prefer working dawn to dusk picking bugs off of your crops, with the constant spectre of crop failure and famine? Do you prefer living in a mud hut to a house with air conditioning, central heat, hot and cold running water, electric lighting and flush toilets? All courtesy of economic powerhouses. Maybe you'd prefer spending your free time spinning thread with your spinning wheel, making cloth, and…

I think you’re presenting a false dichotomy, but we’re not going to solve that in this thread.

Re: The Who Cares Era

#219
post #149

I read the title and it triggered something I've been thinking a lot lately: there's too much for everyone to care about right now. Article didn't really touch on it directly, but: > something that sounded like every other thing: some dude talking to some other dude about apps that some third dude would half-listen-to at 2x speed while texting a fourth dude about plans for later. It's not that the dudes don't care, i…

This hits harder than I expected. There’s a bleak kind of irony in how tech gave us infinite visibility but shredded our ability to process any of it. Stuxnet was a wake-up call. Now it’s just another push alert we swipe past while ordering oat milk.

The caring bandwidth’s not just saturated—it’s been monetized, splintered, and stuffed with things designed to trigger micro-concern at scale. You’re not a cynical old man. You’re just sober in a system that treats numbness like adaptation.

The worst part? I’m not even surprised the BBC article didn’t trend.

Re: The Who Cares Era

#220

Oh man, I gotta write a comment here. I'm gonna leave out a few details in case this guy or my tech lead/manager read HN. So, I am senior software engineer, got hired into this company. I was tasked by my manager/tech lead to work with another senior software engineer. Overtime I realized that this engineer did not have the proper background in this field. I asked him and I asked my tech lead, and confirmed he did no…

In my first job after graduating I've found: * programmer that worked maybe 2h/day, but was otherwise very important to one of the oursourced projects, so he got away with it and was publicly laughing about it without ever getting reprimanded * devops guy that insisted on using his magic copy-pasted shitty shell scripts instead of any popular config management tool at the time, simply to make it harder for anyone els…

It sounds like you should be able to run the table with so little competition. Why not engage, take on more responsibility, and obviously stand out to get more money and influence?
Post reply on HN