Live data from Hacker News

Vibe Coding is not an excuse for low-quality work

addyo.substack.com

211–213 of 213 posts

Re: Vibe Coding is not an excuse for low-quality work

#211
post #140
post #18

This all reminds me a lot of the early 2000's, when big corporations thought they could save a lot of money by outsourcing development work to low-income countries and have their expensive in-house engineers only write specifications. Turns out most of those outsourcing parties won't truly understand the core ideas behind the system you're trying to build, won't think outside the box and make corrections where necess…

Reminds me of this post: https://berthub.eu/articles/posts/how-tech-loses-out/

That was awesome.

Re: Vibe Coding is not an excuse for low-quality work

#212
post #66
post #51

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I wrote about this last month: "Not all AI-assisted programming is vibe coding" - https://simonwillison.net/2025/Mar/19/vibe-coding/ Vibe coding is when you don't review the code at all. If you're using LLMs to help you write code but you're actually reviewing what they produce (and iterating on it) that's not vibe coding any more. This battle is almost certainly lost already, but dammit I'm gonna keep fighting anywa…

We do need a simple term for "used AI to write code (semi)autonomously, but checked and/or tweaked the result and I care about the quality". Vibe-but-verify? Faux-Vibe? AiPair? (... I'll see myself out...)

I call it “AI coding”
Post reply on HN