Live data from Hacker News

Apple pulls data protection tool after UK government security row

bbc.com

211–220 of 1001 posts

Re: Apple pulls data protection tool after UK government security row

#211
post #192

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Our government is almost schizophrenic in its attitude to encryption. Of course: it's not a monolithic entity. It's a composite of different parts that have different goals an interests.

And yet if I steal your money and refuse to give it back, or let you steal it back, you'll call that hypocritical. What does the size of an entity have to do with whether this is idiotic or not?

You're not an entity, you're a person. Scale really does make a difference.

Re: Apple pulls data protection tool after UK government security row

#212
The smartphone is a terrible platform. Something like this could never happen on the PC, where you can install any encryption and backup software that you want.

While Apple did the right thing by refusing to give the UK government a backdoor, they are responsible for getting users in this situation in the first place.

I'm not familiar with the iPhone and maybe there is already an alternative to iCloud ADP, although that would make this whole situation completely nonsensical.

Re: Apple pulls data protection tool after UK government security row

#215

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why do pro-privacy tech folks on here act like Apple is some charity? Apple is a business. It won't fight a citizen's fight on your behalf. It is on citizens to use their democratic power to ensure their representatives act as the voting base wants. Apple's goal is to make money. The government is a representation of your will.

> Apple is a business. It won't fight a citizen's fight on your behalf. Being a business does not remove ethical considerations. And I’m an environment where corporations are considered people, it seems reasonable to expect some degree of alignment with normal citizens. > Apple's goal is to make money. The government is a representation of your will. The government is increasingly not a representation of the collecti…

lol. It literally does. This is a great example. You believe this is an ethical issue. Other shareholders (you are a shareholder, right?) could disagree and now there is a lawsuit. “Complying with national law” seems like an easy win for them.

Re: Apple pulls data protection tool after UK government security row

#216

Ok, I am not very technical. Can someone help me understand this. I don't have Advanced data Protection on. Does that mean UK Gov can see my data now?

They always could. With advanced data protection they could not. The law mandated to add a backdoor to allow the government to also see encrypted data (which made the encryption insecure by definition). Apple refused to comply so you don’t even have the option to encrypt your backups now.

Re: Apple pulls data protection tool after UK government security row

#217

Ok, I am not very technical. Can someone help me understand this. I don't have Advanced data Protection on. Does that mean UK Gov can see my data now?

Potentially. It really just means your data is stored unencrypted, so anybody that has access to Apple's servers can access your data. I don't believe any government has open access to Apple's servers, but they can get a warrant.

I just realized ADP is not same as Lockdown mode. which Apple mentioned that only people that are likely to be targets need to turn on.

Now I don't see any reason why I shouldn't turn ADP on. Turning on now.

Re: Apple pulls data protection tool after UK government security row

#218

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How? In the UK, there's no right to bear arms, so people are pretty helpless against their oppressing government.

I'm sure shooting at the government would have solved this privacy issue.

Surprisingly, the people in the government don't much like being shot. See the reaction to the UHC CEO for an example.

Re: Apple pulls data protection tool after UK government security row

#219

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> abide by the laws and regulations of the countries that they operate in. In this case, the UK is seeking to use local law to change what is allowable on an international basis. That's a bit different than a nation controlling the law on their own soil.

That was Apple's interpretation : That to comply with what the UK requested they would have to have the same thing everywhere. But of course that is nonsense, and Apple could theoretically have a nation-specific backdoor (e.g. for accounts in a given country a separate sequestered decryption key is created and kept in escrow for court order). I mean, Apple "complied" by disabling ADP just in the UK. They undermined t…

> of course that is nonsense

Organizations like the EFF do not agree.

> most concerning, the U.K. is apparently seeking a backdoor into users’ data regardless of where they are or what citizenship they have.

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2025/02/uks-demands-apple-brea...

Re: Apple pulls data protection tool after UK government security row

#220

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Doesn't the US have access to all the data of non US citizens whose data is stored in the US without any oversight? Er, no...? I'm not sure where you get that idea. Access requires a warrant, and companies are not compelled to build systems which enable them to decrypt all data covered by the warrant. See, for example, the Las Vegas shooter case, where Apple refused to create an iOS build that would bypass iCloud s…

I asked if your Android backup is encrypted. Implies I'm talking about unencrypted data. > See, for example, the Las Vegas shooter case I am not in Las Vegas or anywhere else in the US. So as far as i know all the data about me that is stored in the US is easily accessible without a warrant unless it's encrypted with a key that's not available with the storage. > companies are not compelled to build systems which ena…

People always overestimate how much companies will defy their government for you, legally or otherwise.
Post reply on HN