Live data from Hacker News

In Defense of Y'All

texasmonthly.com

211–220 of 381 posts

Re: In Defense of Y'All

#211

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In early modern English, thou and thee were both the informal 2pp, with thou being the subject pronoun and thee being the object pronoun. Thou/you is similar to tu/vous. Eventually, thou became archaic, and we think of archaic words as being more formal. (Aside: In Middle English, ye was strictly plural, but ye became acceptable as formal singular as well, again paralleling vous. And as an additional aside, in the "y…

Yep, exactly!

Misread your comment as saying that thee wasn't informal =)

Re: In Defense of Y'All

#212
post #11

I tease non-Texans that Texan English is actually superior to normal American English because it supports second-person plural via "Y'all" exactly as mentioned in this article... "you guys" is, to some ears, sexist, and "youse guys" (a New York-ism) is a little too old-school Italian. English lost its second person plural when we switched from Thou (second person singular formal + Thee=second person singular informal…

[deleted]

Re: In Defense of Y'All

#213

Y'all is Texas' gift to inclusivity. When I joined a dev team that wasn't just guys, I worked hard to get away from saying "you guys", not because someone said I needed to, but because I felt that I needed to. Y'all worked because I came from Texas and its inclusive of everyone on the team. It has been my personal policy to use that in leu of "you guys" in all situations since then.

Y'all is a feature of general Southern vernacular and has nothing to do with Texas other than most of the settlers of Tejas were from the South.

Re: In Defense of Y'All

#214

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I believe for me that’s Y’all’da - you all woulda.

Keep working on this we’re getting really close to an American yodel.

The functional equivalent of yodeling is 'hollerin', which old timers in the mountains used to do every morning

Re: In Defense of Y'All

#215
post #11

I tease non-Texans that Texan English is actually superior to normal American English because it supports second-person plural via "Y'all" exactly as mentioned in this article... "you guys" is, to some ears, sexist, and "youse guys" (a New York-ism) is a little too old-school Italian. English lost its second person plural when we switched from Thou (second person singular formal + Thee=second person singular informal…

As a native midwesterner, I get more annoyed and defensive than I should when people complain that “you guys” isnt gender neutral. Where I come from, everyone is “a guy”. It can mean “male person”, but that’s only if you use it in specific contexts that brings up gender (like saying “guys and gals”).

[flagged]

Re: In Defense of Y'All

#216

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've still never heard, for example "this guy" when referring to eg a specific female coworker. I live in the midwest. "You guys" is frequently used as a genderless plural sure I guess but "guy" is not gender neutral.

Right, it's only the plural that's gender neutral. Kinda like how in Spanish "abeula" means "grandma", "abuelas" means "grandmas", and "abuelo" means "grandpa", but "abuelos" means "grandparents", not "grandpas". The masculine plural is gender inclusive in most contexts.

Singular example:

If you call a plumber and they say “I’ll send a guy over”, there’s no implication that it’s male. Singular and genderless.

Re: In Defense of Y'All

#217

Y'all gives way to my favorite word, Y'all'd've (You all would have). It it fun to say and wraps up so many grammatical concepts into a neat package. Example usage "It's too bad Y'all didn't come to the party, Y'all'd've had fun"

Never heard anyone pronounce the v in that one, it's always Y'all'd'a, as distinguished from y'all'odda (you all ought to). Similarly we have y'ontu? (do you want to?). Jeff Foxworthy has a bunch of these examples

I'm a very formal hick

Re: In Defense of Y'All

#219

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The context of dating makes it no longer gender neutral. ("Guys and gals") But I've definitely heard people refer to groups composed entirely of women as "you guys".

I've still never heard, for example "this guy" when referring to eg a specific female coworker. I live in the midwest. "You guys" is frequently used as a genderless plural sure I guess but "guy" is not gender neutral.

Context changed the use of language. If you know any foreign languages you know two words that are more or less the same carry a different meaning in context.

Re: In Defense of Y'All

#220
post #215

Earlier quoted context omitted.

As a native midwesterner, I get more annoyed and defensive than I should when people complain that “you guys” isnt gender neutral. Where I come from, everyone is “a guy”. It can mean “male person”, but that’s only if you use it in specific contexts that brings up gender (like saying “guys and gals”).

[flagged]

I use parner for non-gender reasons:

- You might not know their status (married? Dating?) and the phrase “significant other” is clunky

- for grown adults, terms like boyfriend/girlfriend can come off as a little dismissive or juvenile

Post reply on HN