Live data from Hacker News

Why to Not Write a Book

gwern.net

211–215 of 215 posts

Re: Why to Not Write a Book

#211

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Chuck Tingle is a treasure. On the surface all the books are smut, though this is actually because they're smut, but once you dig a little you'll find a ton of other amusements.

All of them are smut? I think you've forgotten Absolutely No Thoughts Of Pounding During My Fun Day With This Kind T-Rex Because I'm Aromantic And Asexual And That's A Wonderfully Valid Way Of Proving Love Is Real .

For a moment I doubted that was real, but then I faced reality.

Re: Why to Not Write a Book

#212

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There's actually a significant corpus of robot stories. However, I did forget that "I, Robot" does have a lot of crimes, investigations, and such.

I am talking about these for example The Caves of Steel (1954) - first Robot series/R. Daneel Olivaw novel The Naked Sun (1957) - second Robot series/R. Daneel Olivaw novel "Mirror Image" (1972) - short story about R. Daneel Olivaw and detective Elijah Baley The Robots of Dawn (1983) - third Robot series/R. Daneel Olivaw novel Robots and Empire (1985) - fourth Robot series/R. Daneel Olivaw novel

Yeah I didn't really think of those as detective stories but it has been a few decades.

Re: Why to Not Write a Book

#215
post #189

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And they are most fun when their author actually understands the subject. Don't make a trek reference unless you know your Kirks from your Spocks.

This is a strange comparison. It is a humorous throwaway line about SF, where the actual 'subject' is not SF at all. (It's nonfiction writing.) That aside, your Kirk/Spock comparison is also wrong: the difference between Kirk and Spock is not a minor terminological quibble over a monster's name (which was not even the most important monster of that movie). The relationship of Kirk/Spock is the heart of _Star Trek_, t…

too short; didn't read
Post reply on HN