Earlier quoted context omitted.
Great idea, but its inconvenient when you need liquidity but the bank doesnt have it. We should let the bank lend out more money than they actually have, and if there's a run the public can just bail them out
Ok I am triggered. I am rather ignorant on the matter but indeed I don't like that some things/people are too big too fail in the system. On the other hand, isn't that established that banks being allowed to issue more money than what is backed by their assets is universally recognized as "good" as in allowing for previously unseen economic development that benefits everyone (but not equally...) ?
The issue is malinvestment and misallocation of resources.
Leverage up on malinvestment (which is what most of the central banks and governments are doing) and it's the fast path to hell.
A fixed supply neutral third party money adds a sort of safety barrier against this leveraged malinvestment.