Live data from Hacker News

Mark Zuckerberg’s new goal is creating artificial general intelligence

theverge.com

211–220 of 362 posts

Re: Mark Zuckerberg’s new goal is creating artificial general intelligence

#211

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Perhaps the primary barrier between a person’s desire and their ability to do harm to the world is their need to bring other people in on the scheme. These other people have their own moral systems, incentives, preferences, and priorities. But through most of history, to do massive scale harm you had to convince a large number of people to your evil purpose. Technology in general reduces the number of people an indiv…

Doesn't sound so different to bot armies which have been messing with upvote counters on social media sites for 2 decades. I'm sure we'll come up with solutions like we did before. Worst case, "present birth certificate and touch heartbeat detector to log in"

Is that why people are dumping billions of dollars into AI development? Because they seem like they’ll be good at clicking upvote buttons?

Yeah, “just make everything on the internet attributable to a specific individual” is actually a pretty bad worst case IMO.

Re: Mark Zuckerberg’s new goal is creating artificial general intelligence

#212

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't think you're looking honestly at yourself... Look at all the harm caused by humans! It's more or less all of it! You might not be uniquely dangerous, but "general intelligence with an internet connection" describes Bill Gates, Rupert Murdoch, and Elon Musk just as well. These individuals seem at least as dangerous as our current generation of AI. (Or do they? I'm not sure I agree with myself here...) Worth co…

Not sure why you chose Bill Gates, Rupert Murdoch, and Elon Musk when you could have chosen people like Stalin or Hitler. People that used their influence to murder millions in much the same way that a AGI could likely use its influence on a naïve population.

I didn't give it much thought, tbh, just picked famous/controversial people. Goebbels was actually my first thought, but he didn't have internet.

Re: Mark Zuckerberg’s new goal is creating artificial general intelligence

#213

The actual quote: > "Our long term vision is to build general intelligence, open source it responsibly, and make it widely available so everyone can benefit." "responsibly" is a pretty important word there that the hn title leaves out. I'm not really sure how that would be possible with a true general intelligence give the alignment problem - it's not really clear to me there's any responsible way to build a true gen…

I am a general intelligence, with the knowledge of the internet at my fingertips, and I am not particularly dangerous.

now imagine you decided to do the maximum amount of harm to your fellow humans. You could do a lot of damage

Re: Mark Zuckerberg’s new goal is creating artificial general intelligence

#214

The actual quote: > "Our long term vision is to build general intelligence, open source it responsibly, and make it widely available so everyone can benefit." "responsibly" is a pretty important word there that the hn title leaves out. I'm not really sure how that would be possible with a true general intelligence give the alignment problem - it's not really clear to me there's any responsible way to build a true gen…

I am a general intelligence, with the knowledge of the internet at my fingertips, and I am not particularly dangerous.

Stop him, he's getting more knowledge!

Re: Mark Zuckerberg’s new goal is creating artificial general intelligence

#215

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I am a general intelligence, with the knowledge of the internet at my fingertips, and I am not particularly dangerous.

Perhaps the primary barrier between a person’s desire and their ability to do harm to the world is their need to bring other people in on the scheme. These other people have their own moral systems, incentives, preferences, and priorities. But through most of history, to do massive scale harm you had to convince a large number of people to your evil purpose. Technology in general reduces the number of people an indiv…

This narrative imagines a future where everything is controlled by a single uber-AI. Is that necessarily the case? Today we have lots of separate systems and even the internet-connected devices are pretty autonomous. Maybe the future will remain similarly distributed?

It feels like everyone's worried about the runaway AI taking over everything when right now a runaway AI wouldn't even be able to turn off my porch light without asking someone to do it. It'll be decades before that changes. Why the huge concern about how smart it is?

Re: Mark Zuckerberg’s new goal is creating artificial general intelligence

#216
post #85

Can't wait to not be able to buy an RTX 5080 next year. Crypto then AI, surely there will be a third thing coming too

I'm hoping that NVidia doesn't give up on the consumer market and keeps producing low cost (and by that I mean $500-1500) GPUs that we can use for hobbyist AI / ML / LLM.

Right now, only the 3090 and 4090 have enough VRAM (24 GB) among the consumer models to make them worthwhile for most LLM work. I'm hoping the 50 series (5090?) has more VRAM and stays affordable - though I'm not holding my breath either.

Re: Mark Zuckerberg’s new goal is creating artificial general intelligence

#217

If only he had set this goal a year ago, maybe John Carmack wouldn't have quit to work on AGI. https://fortune.com/2022/12/17/john-carmack-leaves-meta-as-i...

Carmack seemed to really despise their culture too.

Re: Mark Zuckerberg’s new goal is creating artificial general intelligence

#218

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Don't forget LLaMa

Wasn't llama initially a leak?

AFAIK it was released to "researchers" behind submitting a survey, someone filled out the survey and put it on torrents. There was no way it wouldn't leak.

Re: Mark Zuckerberg’s new goal is creating artificial general intelligence

#219

My money has been on Meta for AGI since they started training people to label data for them (tag your friends!) Between all their properties they have more instrumentation on humans, collecting human behavior trajectories and state action pairs transfer learning and inverse RL than anyone - and it’s not even a close second Specifically and critically I think they likely have the largest egocentric multimodal labeled…

You are completely overlooking a few Chinese companies that have been collecting data online and IRL from a population as large (or larger) than the active users on FB.
Post reply on HN