Live data from Hacker News

Cloudflare lays off new hires

i.imgur.com

211–220 of 276 posts

Re: Cloudflare lays off new hires

#211
post #103

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> So why even bother giving one? Decency? Honesty?

Knowning when to apply honesty is also important. If you tell an ex you left them because they are (fat?), is it honest or is it cruel ?

In fact, they are saying that the relationship ends because she's fat, while the most probable cause is that they have more girlfriends than they can handle. I.e. they do the cruel thing when the honesty would be better.

Re: Cloudflare lays off new hires

#212

I don't understand why Cloudflare can't just be honest and say the reason she got laid off, instead of making up some garbage about her performance. That was her main complaint, and I side with her completely. She was not asking to keep her job, or asking unreasonable questions. If they just explained that it was because the company overhired, or because they needed to reduce costs to keep the company afloat, that wo…

Under California Law (Cloudflare is HQ'd in San Francisco), she is employed "at-will." Unless covered by a union contract, she can be fired/laid off at any time for any reason, or for no reason at all.

According to such law, the company does not need to provide any information as to the reason she was terminated. However, one could argue that it would be a common and professional courtesy to give straight answers.

The only unlawful reasons were if she was terminated for violation of her civil rights based on a few protected classes, was harassed, or if she was retaliated against as part of a few protected activities (whistleblower, jury duty, labor organizing, safety comlaint).

"When an employee feels that they have been terminated, harassed or discriminated against based on their race, religion, gender, color, national origin, ancestry, disability, medical condition, marital status, age (over 40), sexual orientation or denial of family medical leave, they should contact the Department of Fair Employment and Housing at 1-800-884-1684 or at www.dfeh.ca.gov"

Text in full: https://www.dir.ca.gov/dlse/TerminationOfEmployment.pdf

Re: Cloudflare lays off new hires

#213

I wonder if the US will ever get first-world tier labor laws that prevent companies from screwing people over like this. Doesn't seem likely any time soon, but it's so insane how healthcare and everything is tied to an employer and in most places they can just fire you on a whim and not offer severance or anything.

If you are working in tech, you can just save let's say quarter of your salary every month as a personal unemployment insurance and still be much better off than some dude working in EU Google office for half your salary (or even less!) with higher taxes.

Re: Cloudflare lays off new hires

#214

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I don't understand why Cloudflare can't just be honest and say the reason she got laid off, instead of making up some garbage about her performance. In the video she says she was hired August 25th, or 4.5 months ago. She also says she hasn't "closed anything officially", or in other words zero sales. I understand this is an emotionally charged topic, but the unfortunate reality is that being past your ramp-up perio…

I don’t know how tech sales work so I’m speaking from an uneducated place here - but is 4.5 months enough time to close any sales? I imagine that at least a month of that 4.5 months is spent onboarding and shadowing someone else to see how the company handles sales. I also imagine that any tech sales right now are difficult to close given the shrinking customer base due to the number of startups that are folding. And…

It depends on the average deal size for B2B Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) products like Cloudflare. Depending on whether a deal is $100k, which may take ~5.5 months or more.

Source: https://blog.salesflare.com/saas-sales

From my own experience working adjacent to sales for much of my career: Depending on what customer type and industry she is selling to — say, banking or Federal government sales, or sales of ARR >$1m — some sales cycles could even be superannual.

Note that many deals at Cloudflare are >$100k.

Source c. 2020: https://www.saastr.com/5-interesting-learnings-from-cloudfla...

Yet starter packages of Cloudflare can be as low as $20 to $200 / month ($240 to $2400 annually), though those lower tiers are likely all self-service to begin with; she likely wouldn't even be involved except to qualify them for a bigger follow-on deal size.

Source: https://www.cloudflare.com/plans/

Re: Cloudflare lays off new hires

#215
post #89
post #62

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm also interested in the responses to your questions, but I would ask something else: are non-tech companies also doing layoffs? I'm not in the US so I'm not really up to date to that.

The layoffs are widespread. For example, Dominos just laid off 1,200 drivers. However discussions about the economy's health become particularly politicaly charged during an election year. So any conversation about the state of the economy, whether it's perceived as good or bad, inevitably carries political implications in this context. Edit: it is not Dominos it is Pizza Hut https://www.sfgate.com/food/article/pizza…

In that link it says they are required to pay all restaurant workers $20 an hour due to new laws. From my understanding that job gets a lot of tips in America so they don't want to cough up $20 an hour.

the idea of having in-house delivery people for any place is outdated compared to gig apps probably. You only lose a bit of money by not having your own people.

Re: Cloudflare lays off new hires

#216
post #93

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> The company wants to try and make more money and one way is eliminating your job. Why is that so personal? God forbid we expect people to be treated with a bit of dignity and given the opportunity to actually say goodbye to their friends and colleagues. Millennials grew up being told over and over “be loyal to a company and they’ll treat you well” and have largely began their careers in an era where it’s clear comp…

I'm a millennial and I'm not naive enough to believe a company has my best interest at heart. This is year 2 of rough layoffs in tech. anyone that didn't see January coming as layoff month is dumb.

I'm not saying that you should believe they do, but it's pretty common for companies to act like they do and given how common that kind of loyalty talk is, it doesn't surprise me that people do

Re: Cloudflare lays off new hires

#217

I don't understand why Cloudflare can't just be honest and say the reason she got laid off, instead of making up some garbage about her performance. That was her main complaint, and I side with her completely. She was not asking to keep her job, or asking unreasonable questions. If they just explained that it was because the company overhired, or because they needed to reduce costs to keep the company afloat, that wo…

I can't edit the main post, so I'll add here: apparently the reason they refuse to give her a non-performance related reason is so they don't have to pay out unemployment benefits. Makes total sense, and is a very sleazeball tactic.

Re: Cloudflare lays off new hires

#218

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In the case of the video, the implication is that she was told she’s being fired for performance, which seems unreasonable as she appears to have just finished training. I think the days of HR giving references with any information are long gone, but I still wouldn’t want to chance having something in my “file” about being let go for performance if that wasn’t the real reason. That and it’s just common decency to not…

> In the case of the video, the implication is that she was told she’s being fired for performance, which seems unreasonable as she appears to have just finished training. She says she was hired 4.5 months ago and that her ramp-up quota period was 3 months long. That's not quite "just finished training". In sales, once your ramp up period is over you're expected to be held to the same performance standards as everyon…

> That's not quite "just finished training".

In some places i've worked it most certainly would be, others not so much. I don't know if we have that level of information in this case however.

My background has been in hosting/cloud and I've run and worked within sales teams and its generally been:

Selling $5 dollar a month shared hosting accounts and 50 dollar dedies? Yeah, you should probably have something by the end of your first month after ramp.

Selling 50k+ a month cloud infrastructure and engineering services solutions? You get at LEAST one dud quarter to find your feet after ramp, if due to nothing else other than its a significantly longer lifecycle.

Re: Cloudflare lays off new hires

#219

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Genuine question: Do you think that people in countries with strong labour laws are signing up to be literal slaves?

I used to work in the UK. I once worked for a company that had a salesperson that wanted to quit. He was forced to do a non-sales job for thirty days stacking boxes and sorting old files before he was allowed to leave and he hated every minute of it. So yes, sometimes strong labor laws have a hint of slavery to them, but certainly not equivalence to real slavery.

That unusual. He’d only be obliged to continuing his job during his notice period. Not a different job. Sounds like he didn’t know his rights.

Most UK contracts will also include a clause allowing the company to end the employment immediately as long as they still pay out what the employee would have earned during their notice period.

Having been through a few roles in the uk myself, the obligation on the company to give me adequate notice (and pay) has always benefited me.

Re: Cloudflare lays off new hires

#220

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In the case of the video, the implication is that she was told she’s being fired for performance, which seems unreasonable as she appears to have just finished training. I think the days of HR giving references with any information are long gone, but I still wouldn’t want to chance having something in my “file” about being let go for performance if that wasn’t the real reason. That and it’s just common decency to not…

> In the case of the video, the implication is that she was told she’s being fired for performance, which seems unreasonable as she appears to have just finished training. She says she was hired 4.5 months ago and that her ramp-up quota period was 3 months long. That's not quite "just finished training". In sales, once your ramp up period is over you're expected to be held to the same performance standards as everyon…

The time window also spanned two major US holidays. There’s always a sales slump in November-December, so that should have been accounted for.
Post reply on HN