Earlier quoted context omitted.
Signal processing algorithms can pull out a signal from well below the noise floor these days. Even the small and nondirectional antennas on your phone are good enough to receive GPS signals even all the way down at -125 dBm, which is WAY less than your phone receives in interference from random radio stations and faulty LED bulbs nearby. The tech used to receive Voyager signals is not really different, just more sen…
Interesting! Why faulty LED bulbs in particular, does it have to do with their PWM frequency?
Voyager 1 stops communicating with Earth
211–220 of 649 posts
Re: Voyager 1 stops communicating with Earth
#212Criminy. Why aren't we launching more of these probes? With Musk's cheap rockets, we could launch a fleet of them.
Re: Voyager 1 stops communicating with Earth
#213Re: Voyager 1 stops communicating with Earth
#214How is it possible to still be able to get a signal from a spacecraft that's so far away? How can the antenna be directional enough while still being pointed right at the Earth? How do we remove the noise?
A ridiculously huge and powerful array of antennas spread across the planet. NASA has a dashboard online for the Deep Space Network and you can see live which spacecraft we're communicating with. The Voyagers are usually active any time I look.
Re: Voyager 1 stops communicating with Earth
#215> Initially designed to last five years NASA tech often seems to outlive its initial mission length by a massive margin. The Mars rovers spring to mind. It's incredibly impressive, and almost embarrassing! Surely this isn't accidental. Is the kit massively over-specced? Do the uncertainties and risks necessitate such a depth of redundancy that when stuff goes kinda smoothly the thing lasts 9 times longer than it was…
In addition to what other people mentioned (if you design something to have a 99.99% chance of lasting x years, it'll probably last some multiple of x), a lot of failures follow what's called a bathtub curve (visual depiction: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bathtub_curve#/media/File%3A... ). Once you can make something work for 1 day, you're past the most dangerous phase.
Re: Voyager 1 stops communicating with Earth
#216Criminy. Why aren't we launching more of these probes? With Musk's cheap rockets, we could launch a fleet of them.
Re: Voyager 1 stops communicating with Earth
#217Criminy. Why aren't we launching more of these probes? With Musk's cheap rockets, we could launch a fleet of them.
Part of the appeal of the mission was that it will be a very long time before we could possibly do this again because the planets won't line up correctly and we have no technology to speed the probes up to the velocities that the voyager probes achieved.
Re: Voyager 1 stops communicating with Earth
#218Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why isn't it linear?
Best guess: You get particles orbiting the sun, until you pass a point where the sun's gravity is too weak to hold them, and from that point you basically only see things who's escape trajectory intersects with yours
The particles hitting Voyager aren't orbiting the Sun; they're from the Sun, the solar wind. The heliopause is the point where they are stopped by the interstellar medium. That point is what Voyager passed as shown in the graph.
Re: Voyager 1 stops communicating with Earth
#219Criminy. Why aren't we launching more of these probes? With Musk's cheap rockets, we could launch a fleet of them.
Voyager took advantage of a specific alignment of planets that allowed it to make many consecutive gravity assists.