Live data from Hacker News

Air quality monitors: paying more does not get you more accuracy

airgradient.com

211–218 of 218 posts

Re: Air quality monitors: paying more does not get you more accuracy

#211
post #151

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why are pharmaceutical companies allowed to sell medicine that has no improvement over placebo? See phenlyephrine which is in every single OTC decongestant/cold medication

That’s specifically because the DEA and congress cracked down on the useful alternative.

That doesn't explain why they're allowed to sell something that doesn't actually do anything while claiming it does. It just explains why they want to.

Re: Air quality monitors: paying more does not get you more accuracy

#212

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There is zero way your body is losing a quarter pound at night through either process in a room at 70 degrees

Veritasium did a video on this. He lost around 250g each night, which is over half a pound. Some of that lost weight was CO2, some of it was water vapor and some of it was sweat. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lL2e0rWvjKI

[deleted]

Re: Air quality monitors: paying more does not get you more accuracy

#213

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There is zero way your body is losing a quarter pound at night through either process in a room at 70 degrees

Veritasium did a video on this. He lost around 250g each night, which is over half a pound. Some of that lost weight was CO2, some of it was water vapor and some of it was sweat. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lL2e0rWvjKI

Thanks for info - happy to accept I was wrong :)

Re: Air quality monitors: paying more does not get you more accuracy

#214

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Eufy smart scale P2 Pro. $79.99 It has wifi and bluetooth, so it always syncs up with your phone and can track multiple people. I don't really trust the body measurement stuff but use it for measurement per measurement information. The heart rate is kind of nice to track too.

Even cheaper, and IMO slightly more reputable, the $50 withings scale is pretty great, and it's half the price of the version with useless body composition measurements.

Looks good too. I bought pre-doorbell controversy along with a doorbell. It appears Eufy/Anker is doing better now.(0) After having a couple different webcams taken over by security holes, mine only point outside and are hidden.

0. https://www.theverge.com/23573362/anker-eufy-security-camera...

Re: Air quality monitors: paying more does not get you more accuracy

#215
post #42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This has been analysed extensively on our forum and the root cause was a bug in the software serial Arduino library as well as a slightly wrong command send from our library. Details [1] [1] https://forum.airgradient.com/t/co2-reading-of-3-constantly/...

Arduino library eh? Would definitely recommend getting away from that as soon as possible. When I worked with avr controllers we eventually ended up writing all of our own library code because it was still faster than trying to debug these strange heisenbugs caused by gnarly bugs in the libraries. I specifically remember softserial was very problematic, and actually reading the code convinced me to dump it. Might be…

Is there a library that you do recommend using for serial comms?

Re: Air quality monitors: paying more does not get you more accuracy

#216

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If it's measuring VOCs and you live in a city then chances are it would be measuring car exhaust!

Is that bad? I mean, VOC's are VOC's regardless of source, no?

Depends if you care about CO2 and presumably the CO2 from breathing humans. The VOCs from cars in a busy city will mask/overwhelm/confound any measure of human body produced CO2 in that location. But a more suburban or rural location will be fine.

Re: Air quality monitors: paying more does not get you more accuracy

#217
post #120
post #80

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I attached a cheap IKEA Vindriktning PM2.5 sensor to esphome to get air cleanliness data into Home Assistant [1]. That's also very simple to do - solder some wires and write a few lines of yaml and it shows up in the web UI. I bought two of them and they are accurate to each other, so the sensors appear to be acceptable. [1] https://plett.uk/posts/ikea-air-sensor/

Do you know if the new ikea air quality sensor has the same fan as the first one? The original had a fan that would turn on and off every ten seconds.

It does but it's a different sensor and doesn't pulse as frequently (I think it has a weekly pulse to clean it... SENS54 is the sensor if you want to look it up)

Re: Air quality monitors: paying more does not get you more accuracy

#218
post #71

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I have looked for this myself, and come to the conclusion that it doesn't exist unless you're willing to buy a second hand, bulky hospital scale. Measuring human weight is harder than it seems (we don't stay still). Most scales use a strain gauge sensor that detects bending of a metal arm through changes in resistance. It's pretty noisy and needs averaging. There's some integrated circuits to relate the resistance to…

Even without endorsing, could you at least tell us the model?

Avec Maman AM05
Post reply on HN