Remove “This incident will be reported.” from user warnings

I disagree that it's a joke, because they're absolutely nothing funny or clever or original about it, but you're right that the point is to jump on a bandwagon, and it's intentionally ironically disrespectful of everyone's time and attention, which is also the point. It's really just a spammy childish 4chan troll.

All Due Respect: Press F for Farce. Recently, Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare became roundly mocked when images showed a funeral event where the player is asked to “Press [F] to Pay Respects.”

https://www.gamedeveloper.com/design/all-due-respect-press-f...

>On the other hand, Call of Duty forces the player to Pay Respects for the game to proceed. It’s a mission objective just like any other, complete with an interactive reticle floating above the coffin. Furthermore, it’s embarrassing to ask the player to take this action explicitly. This is a military funeral! What else would you do, blow a raspberry? It’s no wonder players feel insulted.

Ludonarrative Dissonance:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ludonarrative_dissonance

>Ludonarrative dissonance is the conflict between a video game's narrative told through the story and the narrative told through the gameplay. Ludonarrative, a compound of ludology and narrative, refers to the intersection in a video game of ludic elements (gameplay) and narrative elements. The term was coined by game designer Clint Hocking in 2007 in a blog post.

I love that a product decision for such a critical piece of software infrastructure includes a link to an xkcd comic for justification

During college in the mid 2000s I discovered that the network share with all corporate data was accessible (read only) to everyone.

The only way it was not immediately obvious was because only sub folders were assigned a drive letter, and the network share was hidden in the UI. I found a way around that in the Windows open dialog and then was able to trigger Explorer to the top level directory.

The share also contained private data of applicants (names, addresses, date of birth, education history) which was most concerning to us.

With some friends we wrote a document showing what we found (not explaining how to do it) and posted it to an internal message board. We also sent copies via email to our IT teacher, sysadmin and the principle. Shortly after the sysadmin invited us for a chat and basically told us not to do that again.

A couple of hours later we were invited to the principles office. The principle was away at the time, but the vice principle - who wanted to make a name for himself - immediately suspended us all and said he'd discuss it with the principle but said most likely we would be expelled, and they may need to involve the police.

Our main concern in the post we made was that personal data was effectively publically accessible (to anyone who connects to ethernet - you didn't even need to log in). Even before GDPR, our country had very strong data protection laws which this would have breached.

A few days later a parent sent a letter to the principle, effectively restating what we said, with added threats of reporting them for violating data protection of minors. Strangely after that the issue was dropped and we were allowed back...

Why are we changing things that aren't broken? Did this message trigger some snowflake?

Per the commit message:

> Whether or not sudo sends email is now configurable, so the warning may not be accurate. It is also confusing to the user since they will not know who the incident is being reported to.