211–220 of 1001 posts
"Good news, we've increased our turn limits to 15/150. Also confirming that the next-gen model Bing uses in Prometheus is indeed OpenAI's GPT-4 which they just announced today." - Jordi Ribas, Corporate VP @ Bing/Microsoft
I cant wait for this to do targeted censorship! It already demonstrates it has strong biases deliberately programmed in: > I cannot endorse or promote smoking, as it is harmful to your health. But it would likely happily promote or endorse driving, skydiving, or eating manure - if asked in the right way.
Does "Open"AI really not even say how many parameters their models have?
LLMs will eventually make a lot of simpler machine-learning models obsolete. Imagine feeding a prompt akin to the one below to GPT5, GPT6, etc.: prompt = f"The guidelines for recommending products are: {guidelines}. The following recommendations led to incremental sales: {sample_successes}. The following recommendations had no measurable impact: {sample_failures}. Please make product recommendations for these custome…
Humans often aren’t much better, making up a rational sounding argument after the fact to justify a decision they don’t fully understand either.
A manager might fire someone because they didn’t sleep well or skipped breakfast. They’ll then come up with a logical argument to support what was an emotional decision. Humans do this more often than we’d like to admit.
It is amazing how this crowd in HN reacts to AI news coming out of OpenAI compared to other competitors like Google or FB. Today there was another news about Google releasing their AI in GCP and mostly the comments were negative. The contrast is clearly visible and without any clear explanation for this difference I have to suspect that maybe something is being artificially done to boost one against the other.
GPT-4 is available now for subscribers to GPT+. It can be selected from the drop-down.
> What are the implications for society when general thinking, reading, and writing becomes like Chess? I think going from LSAT to general thinking is still a very, very big leap. Passing exams is a really fascinating benchmark but by their nature these exams are limited in scope, have very clear assessment criteria and a lot of associated and easily categorized data (like example tests). General thought (particularl…
>Suppose I have a cabbage, a goat and a lion, and I need to get them across a river. I have a boat that can only carry myself and a single other item. I am not allowed to leave the cabbage and lion alone together, and I am not allowed to leave the lion and goat alone together. How can I safely get all three across?
In my test, GPT-4 charged ahead with the standard solution of taking the goat first. Even after I pointed this mistake out, it repeated exactly the same proposed plan. It's not clear to me if the lesson here is that GPT's reasoning capabilities are being masked by an incorrect prior (having memorized the standard version of this puzzle) or if the lesson is that GPT'S reasoning capabilities are always a bit of smoke and mirrors that passes off memorization for logic.
Does anyone see GPT-4 in ChatGPT yet?
I think it's interesting that they've benchmarked it against an array of standardized tests. Seems like LLMs would be particularly well suited to this kind of test by virtue of it being simple prompt:response, but I have to say...those results are terrifying. Especially when considering the rate of improvement. bottom 10% to top 10% of LSAT in What are the implications for society when general thinking, reading, and…