Live data from Hacker News

Insulin is way too expensive. California has a solution: Make its own

vox.com

211–220 of 273 posts

Re: Insulin is way too expensive. California has a solution: Make its own

#211
post #75

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Municipal broadband, power, roads, schools, post, housing, and healthcare? It's long overdue, and with an appropriate amount of funding has been shown to be effective at controlling costs and delivering moderately good quality in most cases. Where? The US has among the highest percentage of kids going to government owned and operated schools. We have plenty of government housing as well (projects). Nearly all of ou…

There are many causes of lackluster public education, and funding is definitely one of them. Another huge one is the ability of parents who have the time and resources to divert their children (likely already at a huge advantage) to private and charter schools, thereby skewing the public school below the median in a vicious circle. I’ve seen this exact dynamic play out in many of the cities I have lived. It’s also wh…

> There are many causes of lackluster public education, and funding is definitely one of them

Explain why some of the worst school systems are some of the best funded. https://foxbaltimore.com/news/project-baltimore/more-than-75...

https://foxbaltimore.com/news/project-baltimore/baltimore-ci...

Re: Insulin is way too expensive. California has a solution: Make its own

#212
post #75

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Municipal broadband, power, roads, schools, post, housing, and healthcare? It's long overdue, and with an appropriate amount of funding has been shown to be effective at controlling costs and delivering moderately good quality in most cases. Where? The US has among the highest percentage of kids going to government owned and operated schools. We have plenty of government housing as well (projects). Nearly all of ou…

Its easy to point at what doesn't work well, there's tons and tons of things that work great that nobody talks about. Municipal broadband: the best broadband in the entire United States is provided by the municipality of Chattanooga. [1] Post: The USPS is the most trusted brand in the United States, above FedEx and UPS. [2] Transit: The New York City Subway is the 3rd largest metro rail system on earth after London a…

> Transit: The New York City Subway is the 3rd largest metro rail system on earth after London and Guangzhou

It’s also the worst large metro system, by timeliness and reliability, in the world, despite being very well funded.

People in the rest of the country aren’t exactly unaware of New York. But its transit, housing, and public school systems are a poster child for how government-run services are terrible, even when well funded. There’s a reason why New York has suffered net domestic outmigration for many years.

Look, if Stockholm was in America the American public would have a very different idea of what government-run services could be like. But we don’t have Swedes running our government services, we have Americans. It is what it is.

Re: Insulin is way too expensive. California has a solution: Make its own

#213
post #73

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I don't understand. My understanding of why insulin is so expensive: intellectual property laws are enforced by the government preventing businesses without that intellectual property to compete in the space. That’s not an accurate understanding of intellectual property specifically. Insulin isn’t like a pill, where once you have a chemical formula you can make millions of them very cheaply. It’s a biologic, an art…

Hi Rayiner, you are spot on with your analysis. My name is Eric, and my non-profit, Project Insulin, is tackling this problem head-on as well. We are developing a biosimilar insulin and will distribute it directly to patients at cost. The drug development process is still expensive but much cheaper because of the Biologics Act that was passed in 2020. When going through the FDA approval process, biosimilar insulin ma…

Very cool. This is much needed.

Re: Insulin is way too expensive. California has a solution: Make its own

#214
post #209
post #115

Earlier quoted context omitted.

People dont want insulin (traditional insulin.) They want fancy insulin (modern insulin), because it is convenient. They want modern rapid and long acting insulin. They want pens. Maybe people want the inhalable powder. Those innovations exist outside the original insulin patent. They are also mixing other drugs with the insulin. >Average retail prices of Novolin and Humulin (traditional short- and intermediate-actin…

I do agree with the statement that some of the language around the lack of insulin availability is misleading, but it's not just that it's more convenient. "Fancy" insulin allows one to better manage blood glucose levels. Poorly managed blood glucose strains various organs/systems in the body and over years and decades leads to various health complications, some resulting in death. (It's still a lot of work and stres…

I dont mean to be dismissive or elitist. There is enough wrong with the medical system, that if somebody loses coverage and needs to see a doctor to get their prescription changed, that change alone becomes insurmountable, behavioral change not included.

My rub is that the conversation is dishonest. Saying "access to insulin is a right" and then changing the topic to modern delivery methods and such. Call a spade a spade, and have the direct honest conversation the first time. My pertubement goes beyond this topic into social justice/political correctness and just about anything. I may believe in the cause and the result, but be dismissive of how to get there by cheating and hacking peoples attention spans. It seems the only way to be an activist and get attention is to start with a lie, and now everybody is competing for the most inflammatory headline.

Everything you said is the conversation everybody should be having, instead of truncating it to "insulin is way too expensive."

Re: Insulin is way too expensive. California has a solution: Make its own

#215
post #85

This is a failure of the free market. When companies get too big, and no longer compete, they should be regulated. The free market only works when there's a ... free ... market.

Insulin is hyper regulated in the US. There is no free market for insulin.

Is it significantly cheaper in other jurisdictions? Like Canada?

Re: Insulin is way too expensive. California has a solution: Make its own

#216
My fiancée was close to death from a missed diagnosis of Type 1 diabetes. We were extremely lucky that she actually got a diagnosis; A nurse at the oncology ward had a hunch. (Overburdened medical personnel miss diagnoses.)

Her HbA1c long-term blood sugar measurement was literally off the charts. Off the chart on the wall on the hospital, right through the red “DANGER” section. She had lost 17% of her bodyweight and half of her hair.

We have learned the following:

You want a continuous glucose monitor (CGM), and an insulin pump, with rapid-acting insulin.

You do not want long-acting insulin. Especially not insulin glargine. It is a dangerous form of insulin: It is injected as a blob of insulin (“bolus”) under the skin. It’s supposed to stay in the place and slowly fritter and diffuse into the bloodstream. This effect is due to crystallization of the modified insulin amino acid chain in the pH level inside the body. It’s clever. However, if insulin glargine happens to go into a blood vessel, it works pretty much instantly. Then it is not long-acting at all. The subcutaneous environment is… living tissue. There are capillaries. It can and will go into directly into the bloodstream at some point. For some reason. At injection time, or due to bumps and jostles and physical pressure. Then there are no brakes on it. 24 hours’ worth of active insulin can go into the bloodstream. Then every cell in the body is signaled hard to pull glucose from the blood – all the flesh in the body rips the sugar out of your blood, leaving too little for the brain. People start losing consciousness in minutes, csn pass out, and may die.

Insulin degludec is another long-acting insulin, one which is acceptable in this regard. The bolus stays glommed together due to polymerization of the insulin so it’s more robust. It also has molecular brakes on it kind of – if it does go into the bloodstream, it attaches to albumin in blood plasma and doesn’t become active all at once.

However, using rapid-acting insulin in a pump is strictly better because this replicates the insulin oscillation of the pancreas. “[The pancreas’] basal insulin level is not stable. It oscillates with a regular period of 3-6 min. After a meal the amplitude of these oscillations increases but the periodicity remains constant. The oscillations are believed to be important for insulin sensitivity by preventing downregulation of insulin receptors in target cells. Such downregulation underlies insulin resistance, which is common in type 2 diabetes.”https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insulin_oscillation

The insulin pumps work this way. They pump the insulin with a rhythm. It’s easier to control the blood sugar and you need less insulin. It’s crucially different and much better for long-term health and quality of life.

The most important things are a good blood sugar sensor (continuous glucose meter or CGM), and a good pump with a good user interface. We haven’t tried one of the closed-loop automatically controlled pumps that reads from the sensor and autoadjusts, but it’s clear from the problems people have with badly designed pump that a good “semiautomatic” pump is better than a poor and unpredictable sensor-feedback-controlled automatic one. These have issues like sometimes cutting out without giving clear warning if blood sugar is high, and the blood sugar target range can’t be adjusted low enough (liability issues afaik) so people tend to stay at too high blood sugar levels which do long-term harm. I do assume that a good automatic pump is magic.

Also, glucose metabolism and inflammation are intimately related, which ties into the vascular system. There is a lot more actionable science out on this than most doctors are aware of. (Overburdened medical personnel are unable to keep abreast of scientific developments.)

Re: Insulin is way too expensive. California has a solution: Make its own

#217

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There are many causes of lackluster public education, and funding is definitely one of them. Another huge one is the ability of parents who have the time and resources to divert their children (likely already at a huge advantage) to private and charter schools, thereby skewing the public school below the median in a vicious circle. I’ve seen this exact dynamic play out in many of the cities I have lived. It’s also wh…

> There are many causes of lackluster public education, and funding is definitely one of them Explain why some of the worst school systems are some of the best funded. https://foxbaltimore.com/news/project-baltimore/more-than-75... https://foxbaltimore.com/news/project-baltimore/baltimore-ci...

The increase mentioned in your article was in the last 4 years? Seems a bit late for the testing outcomes in your original link. Pretty terrible example. Also, that area is a perfect example of where parents with the means move their kids (and their attention) to charter/private operations, exacerbating the problem.

Re: Insulin is way too expensive. California has a solution: Make its own

#218
post #128
post #76

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You know developing insulin doesn't require violating patents, right? And the price of insulin in the US is entirely an artifact of monopoly behavior by a small number of pharmaceutical companies? The ability to mass produce insulin at negligible cost has been around for decades, they guy who discovered it made it patent free even. Only in the US do companies get away with this kind of price gouging, and only because…

Insulin is cheap. Long acting insulin is not. They are different products, and the formers patent being free has nothing to do with the later innovations being locked down.

Hi even the long acting insulin has been quoted to cost around $10 to manufacture (at scale)!

Re: Insulin is way too expensive. California has a solution: Make its own

#219
post #186

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Hi Rayiner, you are spot on with your analysis. My name is Eric, and my non-profit, Project Insulin, is tackling this problem head-on as well. We are developing a biosimilar insulin and will distribute it directly to patients at cost. The drug development process is still expensive but much cheaper because of the Biologics Act that was passed in 2020. When going through the FDA approval process, biosimilar insulin ma…

Why is insulin not expensive in other countries?

While I don't know the answer to this in-depth I can share some bullet points and of course it depends on what country you are talking about. On top of that it is important to note that there are insulin shortages in various countries.

- one payer healthcare systems - non-convoluted distribution systems - depending where cheaper workforce/cheaper to make the insulin - less stringent regulatory processes - stronger lobbying groups in the US

Re: Insulin is way too expensive. California has a solution: Make its own

#220
post #194

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I would like to point out that these fancy insulins have been around since 1996. I do agree that there is cheaper insulin available, but as others mentioned there is a significant change in quality. But I agree with you that the conversation should be affordable high quality insulin. Another piece of the insulin ad drug saga that I haven't seen many people discuss here is the distribution of drugs. The distribution f…

I assume when you say 1996, you mean Humalog/insulin lispro? That falls in the rapid category, but I feel like most of the conversation about people wanting cheap modern insulin is the long acting right? The primary quality of life improvement people seek is having to inject only once a day, plus extra if diet requires? I was dating 20 years from glargine (invented 1994, approved 2000), which is technically still pat…

yes apologies glargine was approved in 2000. And I agree it does take a while for doctors to switch. Something interesting that I have recently learned is that it may even be hard to find clinical trial participants because doctors will be hesitant to take patients who have good reactions to their current insulin off of that insulin to be a part of a clinical trial.

I will also say that Pharmacy Benefit Managers (PBMs) also have a lot of power when it comes to influencing doctors to begin prescribing new drugs.

Post reply on HN