211–220 of 266 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
If I was trying to invent some “fair taxation scheme” I’d tax the profit based on the revenue in that country. So if a company had $100B global revenue and $10B global profit and 0% of the profit was in France while 10% of the revenue was in France, then the company should be taxed based on the $1B profit that can be attributed to France based on revenue there. Any other scheme seems it’s prone to creative licensing…
If you're trying to do fair taxation do away with "profit" taxes entirely. Not like any of us plebs get to dodge taxes by spending our income. Subtract what the company spends on salaries from its total revenue and then charge them 20-30 percent of the remainder just like the rest of us pay. "Corporations are people" after all. Toss in a seven percent sales tax on all stock purchases.
corporations aren't people, and I think you know this. "corporate personhood" means that a corporation has some (not all) of the rights held by individual people. it certainly does not mean that it makes sense to tax corporations as if they were humans that filed a W-2 each year.
what do you think would be solved by jacking up the corporate tax rate specifically? or put differently, whose pocket do you imagine this money comes out of?
the owners are already taxed on any income or capital gains they derive from ownership, employee pay is taxed on both sides, and retail customers pay sales tax. none of those taxes are necessarily optimal, but their impact is at least better understood than corporate tax.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Tax companies that are currently hiding profits in tax havens. > No single country can do this I don't understand. If America already has a >15% tax rate, then it already abides by these rules. America is not a tax haven.
USA needs to tax companies that are headquartered in tax havens, to ensure that those companies can't enjoy less than 15% global taxes. I don't think that USA is doing that right now.
Nobody here seems to understand that this is not about taxes but rather about re-shoring trade power back to the Western world (which is why it concerns the EU the most). EU/US and other developed countries offloaded a part of their industries 20-30 years ago to under-developing countries to save up on some costs.
These countries (evil 0% tax countries) reduced taxes, wages and regulation to attract these offshores companies. Not because these countries like to play games, but because that's their only attraction point. And here we are, 30 years later or something like that, and the EU/US have lost a significant portion of their industrial base.
Now, they want it back. Either because they have a high unemployment rate (ie: France, Italy) and they have actually people who can do these jobs; or because they think the balance has swift too much in favor of these "international" companies and zero-tax countries. Some of them have become too powerful and one of them even downright dangerous to the world order.
Of course, I'm not holding my breath for the "developing" world. It still lacks lots of the infrastructure and many key industries that the EU/US can pressure with. The place to look at will be South East Asia. Europe seems to have lost here to US/Japan and China. I think Europe is going to come to a dark realization real soon. The US might emerge, again ugh, as the winner. China is hated by pretty much all its neighbors.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
US LLCs are pass trough entities and the solution of choice for digital nomads to completely avoid paying any taxes. US is still the best tax avoidance haven for most people. EU does not care about good laws they care about good headlines for the news not matter how shitty the things they do are.
One does not simply avoid paying taxes with an LLC unless your gross income is minute, tax deductible expenses are huge, or your losses are huge. IT IS NOT SOME MAGICAL LOOPHOLE. It is hard enough to stay afloat as a business without misinformation like this being spread.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
At some point, I think governments are going to need to break down and start taxing revenue instead of profits. A 3% tax on total revenue is the same as a 15% tax on the profits of a product with 20% profit margins.
Its one of the reasons Value Added taxes are popular everywhere. (except USA)
I'm here all year, tip the waitress!
This isn't really as big a deal as it's been made out to be, IMO. This is Pillar 2 of the OECDs tax reform for corporations. Pillar 1 is much more interesting, and would require corporations to actually book profits where they are made (so not putting everything through Ireland for example). This will have a much bigger impact imo than this 15% ruling, because right now there are a bunch of tricks you can use to get…
Is this a tax on profits? If so, I worry it will remain weak to hollywood-accounting attacks: it's easy to spend money until there are no 'profits'. I'd really love to see progressive taxation of corporate revenue: the bigger a company is the higher the tax rate. Huge corporations benefit from economies of scale, so there is an incentive for power concentration. This power concentration is bad for society: it deliver…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
What about only taxing B2C revenue? Then the degree of vertical integration wouldn't matter.
It’s much easier to do that with something called a sales tax!
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Individuals (in the US) have standard deduction, which approximates the minimum value to sustain one's person. It's a bad approximation, but it is what it is. It's assumed that corporations spend as little as possible on operations. Individuals obviously don't. Whereas a corporation wouldn't rent employees 500 sqft / person, individuals regularly rent/purchase that density for themselves. Similarly, while a corporati…
With progressive taxation of corporations, we could disincentivize the existence of trillion dollar corporations, opening up the market for thousands more million to billion dollar businesses to exist. Regulatory capture would be much harder to coordinate which would lead to much less corruption. Greater marketplace competition would lead to better quality services and products for consumers. The curve used to shape…