Earlier quoted context omitted.
AI: Oh, showing /u/treeman79 some Family Guy videos increases their engagement, MOAR FAMILY GUY!!!111oneoneone
I assume that's exactly it, why else would companies do this sort of thing, or are all media companies inept.
YouTube’s ‘dislike’ barely works according to new study on recommendations
211–220 of 437 posts
Re: YouTube’s ‘dislike’ barely works according to new study on recommendations
#212YouTube: (removes the ability to see dislikes) Also YouTube: "dislike barely works!"
Re: YouTube’s ‘dislike’ barely works according to new study on recommendations
#213Earlier quoted context omitted.
Search is entirely crippled for new stories now. If I saw some breaking news on Twitter I used to pop over to Youtube to find original or better footage than news services were getting, or to get it faster. Impossible via YT's search now, it's just pages and pages of old-media channels with their thoughts on the footage, always clipped down and talked over. Even Twitter seems to do this now, it's becoming harder to f…
Yandex.com, my friend. It even returns results from Ulta Cancelled video websites like Bitchute, Rumble and Odyssey.
Re: YouTube’s ‘dislike’ barely works according to new study on recommendations
#214Basically Youtube rewards interactions, and a dislike is an interaction. Her main evidence was a video by pewdiepie where he asks everyone who views it to dislike it. It is one of his most viewed videos, at least around that time, and by far the most disliked.
Sadly Ann Reardon names her videos after what she cooks or debunks, and not her critiques on the algorithm (she has quite a few really good one)
I'd appreciate if someone knows the link.
Re: YouTube’s ‘dislike’ barely works according to new study on recommendations
#215Earlier quoted context omitted.
I've had videos not show up in the YouTube search despite the query matching the video title verbatim.
Yup. I now pretty much use YouTube search only to call up a video where I have the YT ID. Everything else is a waste of time, and I just use DDG search if I want to find something without the ID in hand. How management thinks it is a good idea to make their products useless by letting a bunch of self-aggrandizing "analysts" or marketers or whatever attempt to manipulate their customers/viewers is beyond me. The fact…
Re: YouTube’s ‘dislike’ barely works according to new study on recommendations
#216What a lot of people are missing is that when watching YouTube, they're the product, not the consumer. I know this has been said many times before, but ignoring this reality is like trying to understand life without considering evolution, or understanding chemistry while ignoring the periodic table. Google's incentives are to tailor customers to advertisers , not customers to content! They don't care if you see what…
How does this fit if I pay for YouTube Premium? I don’t see the ads, and I guess they still get the data. Why are they trying to drive me to particular content if they can’t show me the ads they want to?
Re: YouTube’s ‘dislike’ barely works according to new study on recommendations
#217The trick to improving YouTube recommendations is to regularly prune uninteresting videos and channels. Eventually this should start surfacing videos you're more likely to find interesting. I've actually hit the end of my recommendation stream on the mobile app after marking dozens of videos with Not Interested. Once this happens it starts recommending videos you've already watched or older videos from creators you'v…
>Some might say that you can still use search At some point Youtube search was neutered. I get 5-10 results for any given query before Youtube gives up and just offers me recommendations rather than search results. Interestingly, if I search google for [search term] site:youtube.com, I actually get pages of results which are never present in the Youtube search. Sadly, it seems that Google has intentionally diminished…
Re: YouTube’s ‘dislike’ barely works according to new study on recommendations
#218I'm not surprised by this. I gave up on the YouTube Home page, etc. years ago and I only look at the Subscriptions page. I've just found new channels to subscribe to through word of mouth over the years and I have more than enough content to choose from.
Re: YouTube’s ‘dislike’ barely works according to new study on recommendations
#219The trick to improving YouTube recommendations is to regularly prune uninteresting videos and channels. Eventually this should start surfacing videos you're more likely to find interesting. I've actually hit the end of my recommendation stream on the mobile app after marking dozens of videos with Not Interested. Once this happens it starts recommending videos you've already watched or older videos from creators you'v…
> Some might say that you can still use search, but that has been crippled to include unrelated recommendations after one page of results. Not only that, I want YouTube to help me discover new content. When the recommendation system works and it shows me new kinds of interesting stuff, it's superb. TikTok is eating YouTube's lunch in this regard. this and it's going too far, since Youtube is now polluting people's se…
"A modern clinician needs to remain abreast of social media sources as knowledge of media content is essential in managing patients in the current environment."
https://movementdisorders.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10...
We've all met people that adopted wholesale the mannerists of this-or-that online influencer; gestures, tonality, jokes and all. It's creepy as hell to see, and sure, and algorithms are reinforcing this phenomenon. An "obsessed fan" is YouTube's ideal viewer, since his engagement will be through the roof.
Spotify is unprofitable, so they allow the biggest artists to pay to be promoted by their algorithms, which shapes the world's music tastes.
Fat people are being recommended mukbang videos.
These algorithms can be studied, as TFA does, and you can try to hold these companies accountable, but there's limited utility in doing scientific studies of algorithms that get updated multiple times a day.
In today's world, manmade algorithms from a handful of huge tech companies are likely exerting more influence over human evolution than nature itself is!