Live data from Hacker News

Nuclear-Powered Cardiac Pacemakers

osrp.lanl.gov

211–220 of 277 posts

Re: Nuclear-Powered Cardiac Pacemakers

#211
post #206

Any chance we can get a nuclear-powered iPhone which lasts 4 years?

Please stop spreading unsubstantiated FUD. If you have the data to prove otherwise, please share the links.

I have had an iPhone 7 for many years; yes, same device. I don't remember the exact time when I got it, but it might've been around 2017. So this device is over 5, if not 6, years old. In all this time, I've had to replace only the screen due to physical damage, but the phone is otherwise perfectly functional. I've been told a few times that the battery needs replacement, but that's primarily because the phone reports battery's "Maximum Capacity" is 73%; but I'm reluctant to replace the battery because I haven't had any problems with the current battery.

Another data point: I bought an iPad Air 2 in November 2016 for my kids, and it's been used by my kids, changing hands as the older one grew out of it, and has had zero issues. Yes, it's screen has got scratches, and it's got blemishes on the body. But it's been running along just fine for over 7 years now. It's getting OS updates, even though it's been discontinued for over 5 years. I cannot say that for any of the Android devices I had bought, not even the ones made by Google.

Before getting the iPhone, I was firmly in the "android is best" camp, and I was almost against buying Apple devices, primarily for the cost of the hardware. I have bought phones, and a tablet, powered by Android, but none of them lasted long enough for me to extract value out of my investment. Either they died early because of some hardware failure, or because the device stopped getting updates.

After trying iPhone, and Apple's other hardware, like MacBooks, I have become a fan of the _quality_ of their products. Their products may not give the customer the same freedoms (of choice) and flexibilities that we've come to expect from Linux and Android worlds, but their products serve the needs of their customers for long durations, and in a way that no other company possesses the ability to do.

If you are of the type who pines for products of a bygone era where the products used to last decades, serving the customers faithfully without much fuss, I think you should seriously consider buying Apple devices.

Re: Nuclear-Powered Cardiac Pacemakers

#212
post #206

Any chance we can get a nuclear-powered iPhone which lasts 4 years?

Please stop spreading unsubstantiated FUD. If you have the data to prove otherwise, please share the links. I have had an iPhone 7 for many years; yes, same device. I don't remember the exact time when I got it, but it might've been around 2017. So this device is over 5, if not 6, years old. In all this time, I've had to replace only the screen due to physical damage, but the phone is otherwise perfectly functional.…

I think they meant the charge lasts for 4 years, not the phone itself.

Re: Nuclear-Powered Cardiac Pacemakers

#213

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Please stop spreading unsubstantiated FUD. If you have the data to prove otherwise, please share the links. I have had an iPhone 7 for many years; yes, same device. I don't remember the exact time when I got it, but it might've been around 2017. So this device is over 5, if not 6, years old. In all this time, I've had to replace only the screen due to physical damage, but the phone is otherwise perfectly functional.…

I think they meant the charge lasts for 4 years, not the phone itself.

The comment complains about the device itself, and not any specific components of it.

> Any chance we can get a nuclear-powered iPhone which lasts 4 years?

Re: Nuclear-Powered Cardiac Pacemakers

#214
post #181

If it is a dead body and it is being cremated you take it out so it doesn't explode in the crematorium. I say this as a former funeral director who had to remove them.

HackerNews truly does pull from a large swatch of interesting people, doesn't it?

Nit: the idiom is "large swath"

Re: Nuclear-Powered Cardiac Pacemakers

#215

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think they meant the charge lasts for 4 years, not the phone itself.

The comment complains about the device itself, and not any specific components of it. > Any chance we can get a nuclear-powered iPhone which lasts 4 years?

I didn't complain about anything. I'm using an iPhone from 2018, but I have to charge it every day. Would be nice to not charge it at all from the time I buy it (like a nuclear power source)

Re: Nuclear-Powered Cardiac Pacemakers

#216

If it is a dead body and it is being cremated you take it out so it doesn't explode in the crematorium. I say this as a former funeral director who had to remove them.

“It was the day my grandmother exploded.”

Thus begins one of my favorite Ian Banks novels, starting with exactly this event.

Re: Nuclear-Powered Cardiac Pacemakers

#217
post #181

Earlier quoted context omitted.

HackerNews truly does pull from a large swatch of interesting people, doesn't it?

boiling it down, what would you say is the link between most common HNers?

Taking the question literally? People who believe democracy makes correct choices.

Re: Nuclear-Powered Cardiac Pacemakers

#218
post #206

Any chance we can get a nuclear-powered iPhone which lasts 4 years?

Please stop spreading unsubstantiated FUD. If you have the data to prove otherwise, please share the links. I have had an iPhone 7 for many years; yes, same device. I don't remember the exact time when I got it, but it might've been around 2017. So this device is over 5, if not 6, years old. In all this time, I've had to replace only the screen due to physical damage, but the phone is otherwise perfectly functional.…

> Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize. Assume good faith.

From the site guidelines. The most plausible interpretation by far is that the comment referred to the time between charges; otherwise, what would nuclear power do to extend the lifespan of a device?

Re: Nuclear-Powered Cardiac Pacemakers

#219
post #215

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The comment complains about the device itself, and not any specific components of it. > Any chance we can get a nuclear-powered iPhone which lasts 4 years?

I didn't complain about anything. I'm using an iPhone from 2018, but I have to charge it every day. Would be nice to not charge it at all from the time I buy it (like a nuclear power source)

Your comment made it sound like you were unhappy with the longevity of the device itself.

> iPhone that lasts 4 years

Sorry if that was not your intent.

Re: Nuclear-Powered Cardiac Pacemakers

#220
post #93

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I know. It's only >100% 'efficient' if you ignore the input of 'outside heat'. That is not a normal calculation, and not really called 'efficiency'. It's desirable for multiple reasons, of course, but it's not efficiency.

Unfortunately by that metric other electrical heaters tend to 0% efficiency because they are not making use of the virtually unlimited energy outside the buildings. The 400% metric let's you compare with other heaters, the 100% is kind of useless.

They're not using them as an input, so.. obviously they're not included in the input/output calculation?
Post reply on HN