We need to go back to the days when sticks and stones broke bones; when words were correctly not "violence" and that your right to not be insulted existed solely in that self-important (but empty) cavern between your ears.
Twitter is using its embedded JavaScript to hide tweets that have been deleted
211–220 of 254 posts
Re: Twitter is using its embedded JavaScript to hide tweets that have been deleted
#212FYI if you block their JS on third-party sites, it works fine: https://i.imgur.com/cb5Lyd5.png
Re: Twitter is using its embedded JavaScript to hide tweets that have been deleted
#213Earlier quoted context omitted.
It is entertaining to watch the waves of opinion crash against each other when things happen that people don't like. The cognitive dissonance must must a deafening roar. On one hand, people get miffed when twitter changes their JS to block out quotes of deleted tweets, citing an alteration of the public record. On the other hand, people argue that twitter is not a "public square" and can do what they want with the co…
It's almost like there's a diverse range of opinions and there isn't a monolithic Hackernews.
Re: Twitter is using its embedded JavaScript to hide tweets that have been deleted
#214Unless you commit and are convicted of an actual crime with your tweet, nothing - absolutely nothing - should result in a blanket ban or deletion of your post. And no, insulting the embedded bloodsuckers that hold congress (and our lives) in an iron grip is not a crime. We need to go back to the days when sticks and stones broke bones; when words were correctly not "violence" and that your right to not be insulted ex…
Re: Twitter is using its embedded JavaScript to hide tweets that have been deleted
#215Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's exactly what an is.
iframe is loading a whole page with script permissions (and sandboxed). it seems there isnt any tag for adding a remote snippet of html, like you can do with ajax
It's not clear what you're asking for. (E.g. do you want that snippet not to be sandboxed?)
Re: Twitter is using its embedded JavaScript to hide tweets that have been deleted
#216Re: Twitter is using its embedded JavaScript to hide tweets that have been deleted
#217Earlier quoted context omitted.
"If you want to act as a repository for the public record, you better use your own system." I deliberately chose Twitter's JavaScript because I inspected the design of how it worked and saw that they had deliberately built it in a way that would respect my preferences for how deletion should be handled. They've changed that on me - without even announcing the change. This is a rug-pull. Now I have to replace their co…
Ask for your money back.
Re: Twitter is using its embedded JavaScript to hide tweets that have been deleted
#218You don't need to use Twitter's JS to show Tweets. If you choose to use their system, you're subject to their rules. If you don't like their rules, don't use their stuff. Calling it "altering the public record" is a little hyperbolic imo. If you want to act as a repository for the public record, you better use your own system. Twitter is under no obligation to retain this kind of stuff on your behalf. I'm not trying…
It is entertaining to watch the waves of opinion crash against each other when things happen that people don't like. The cognitive dissonance must must a deafening roar. On one hand, people get miffed when twitter changes their JS to block out quotes of deleted tweets, citing an alteration of the public record. On the other hand, people argue that twitter is not a "public square" and can do what they want with the co…
Talk about a double-edged sword
Re: Twitter is using its embedded JavaScript to hide tweets that have been deleted
#219Earlier quoted context omitted.
Unfortunately, it doesn't really matter if you disagree. They own the platform, and they can operate it how they please. There's no "changing of the contract" here. Their TOS certainly don't guarantee anything at all in exchange for website owners embedding tweets in this way. Any theoretical moral argument is kind of irrelevant.
You, and many in these comments, seem to be conflating twitter’s legal rights with their informal social obligations. No one is saying this is illegal behavior by Twitter. Some are saying it’s very annoying of them to go back on their established policies and break thousands of websites.
But also, we could not actually expect anything different. The capitalist/corporate environment in which we operate will systematically compel these companies to choose profits over social obligations. They are accountable to their customers (advertisers), and so whatever moral transgressions we people on the street may perceive -- they don't really play into Twitter's decision-making...
Re: Twitter is using its embedded JavaScript to hide tweets that have been deleted
#220Why not just copy paste or screenshot the Tweet? It's bizarre to reference a script from twitter.com directly in your site's source code and then complain that the script is doing exactly what it is supposed to.
The problem here is that you are erasing history. Imagine someone going into the town square and yelling something profane. That can never be unheard, people will never forget. There will be record of it. Twitter is the only authority that can validate that a tweet actually happened. All other archival services can be considered questionable and easily manipulated (albeit unlikely).