I think that the people here speculating about the FBI and private keys are greatly overestimating the competency of these hackers. While it's possible this it he FBI flexing some muscle that they have a backdoor into bitcoin's hashing algorithm, what seems much more likely (to me) is: There is a more sophisticated hacking group which created this particular ransomware package. They sell this ransomware package to le…
DOJ seizes $2.3M in cryptocurrency paid to the ransomware extortionists Darkside
211–220 of 296 posts
Re: DOJ seizes $2.3M in cryptocurrency paid to the ransomware extortionists Darkside
#212Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's utter bs, exchanges generates unique BIP32 addresses for deposit. There isn't a master exchanges key used among all customers.
Which is not something I commented on at all Genuinely curious why you think your response was related or even mutually exclusive
Re: DOJ seizes $2.3M in cryptocurrency paid to the ransomware extortionists Darkside
#213Earlier quoted context omitted.
If the FBI has broke any of Secp256k1, SHA256, or RIPE160, (they have not) they’re not going to blow that on a $3M haul.
They might be saving for bigger things, however this is a lot more than $3million. It's about holding the US economy hostage, as these will increase in frequency.
Re: DOJ seizes $2.3M in cryptocurrency paid to the ransomware extortionists Darkside
#214I think that the people here speculating about the FBI and private keys are greatly overestimating the competency of these hackers. While it's possible this it he FBI flexing some muscle that they have a backdoor into bitcoin's hashing algorithm, what seems much more likely (to me) is: There is a more sophisticated hacking group which created this particular ransomware package. They sell this ransomware package to le…
It is also possible that criminals made themself look stupid and sacrificed a small part (~70 of 310 BTC) of monthly income to throw FBI a bone, so they can fuck off gracefully.
Re: DOJ seizes $2.3M in cryptocurrency paid to the ransomware extortionists Darkside
#215Earlier quoted context omitted.
If the FBI has broke any of Secp256k1, SHA256, or RIPE160, (they have not) they’re not going to blow that on a $3M haul.
They might be saving for bigger things, however this is a lot more than $3million. It's about holding the US economy hostage, as these will increase in frequency.
Re: DOJ seizes $2.3M in cryptocurrency paid to the ransomware extortionists Darkside
#216If the victim pays someone we know which account it goes to, right? Then we know that account is criminal.
If bitcoins move from that account to other accounts we know that accounts that receive them are essentially "hiding stolen goods". So they are criminal accounts as well.
Then at some point they want to get dollars, and FBI can catch them by following where the dollars were sent. No?
Re: DOJ seizes $2.3M in cryptocurrency paid to the ransomware extortionists Darkside
#217Earlier quoted context omitted.
They might be saving for bigger things, however this is a lot more than $3million. It's about holding the US economy hostage, as these will increase in frequency.
How is this holding the US economy hostage?
Re: DOJ seizes $2.3M in cryptocurrency paid to the ransomware extortionists Darkside
#218I was told governments can't get involved in crypto, that's what makes it great? Totally anonymous? Untraceable?
Re: DOJ seizes $2.3M in cryptocurrency paid to the ransomware extortionists Darkside
#219Earlier quoted context omitted.
How is this holding the US economy hostage?
Randomware attacks on energy (oil and potentially electric grid) and hospitals. And that's only what we've seen so far.
Re: DOJ seizes $2.3M in cryptocurrency paid to the ransomware extortionists Darkside
#220Can someone explain simply why it is supposed to be so hard to track ransomware bitcoin payments, if all bitcoin transactions are in a shared public ledger? If the victim pays someone we know which account it goes to, right? Then we know that account is criminal. If bitcoins move from that account to other accounts we know that accounts that receive them are essentially "hiding stolen goods". So they are criminal acc…