Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yeah but imagine if you bought a beer for $4 and then next week the beer was actually worth $8 and the next it was worth $7 and then a few months later the beer was worth $50. The whole point of fiat is that it is stable and so you aren't fucking yourself by exchanging it for consumables.
Even if you buy with fiat, you're still giving up the opportunity cost of not buying Bitcoin. All of our pizzas in 2011 could have been millions
El Salvador to adopt Bitcoin as legal tender
211–220 of 421 posts
Re: El Salvador to adopt Bitcoin as legal tender
#212Well, it this is really true and going to happen, I am glad. In 2014 I was writing a book on Bitcoin, which I never finished. In the various interviews I did with influential people at the time (Yanis Varoufakis, Rick Falkvinge, Chris Dixon, etc), when offering my view, I used to say that the tipping point would have been a country adopting Bitcoin as currency, and guessing it was going to happen by 2020. I was wrong…
Re: El Salvador to adopt Bitcoin as legal tender
#213What would happen to the markets if Satoshi appeared and starts trading his 1 Mi in BTC?
We already have these problems in the normal stock exchange -- they're called "whales". In order for whales to capture the best value to _them_, they trade carefully and slowly so as not to shock the market.
Re: El Salvador to adopt Bitcoin as legal tender
#214Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yeah but imagine if you bought a beer for $4 and then next week the beer was actually worth $8 and the next it was worth $7 and then a few months later the beer was worth $50. The whole point of fiat is that it is stable and so you aren't fucking yourself by exchanging it for consumables.
Tell how stable it is to the Venezuelans or the Zimbabweans or the Russians. And Usd isn't doing too well in the last 2 years.
Re: El Salvador to adopt Bitcoin as legal tender
#215So I guess this is a litmus test for cryptoanarchists: condemn the use of state coercion to mandate the use of Bitcoin or cheer the financial gains Bitcoin holders stand to make?
Re: El Salvador to adopt Bitcoin as legal tender
#216Re: El Salvador to adopt Bitcoin as legal tender
#217Earlier quoted context omitted.
USD has this little problem and it hasn’t even begun to manifest yet. https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/M1SL
No, that graph only shows a discontinuity because the definition of M1 money supply was changed on that date. They explained it fully here: https://fredblog.stlouisfed.org/2021/01/whats-behind-the-rec... Sharing the graph without the context is misleading.
Re: El Salvador to adopt Bitcoin as legal tender
#218Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't see why they would be denominated in BTC, given that BTC will be legal tender alongside USD, and USD is a much more stable currency. Making it a legal currency won't even force anyone to accept it. As far as I understand, it will simply mean that the government will accept payments in BTC.
> the government will accept payments in BTC. The telling thing would be what the gov't pays in (e.g., for tax returns). Do they pay you back in BTC? or fiat?
Re: El Salvador to adopt Bitcoin as legal tender
#219https://millenium-state.com/blog/2019/05/03/the-dinar-gold-t...
Re: El Salvador to adopt Bitcoin as legal tender
#220Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Wow, this seems like an incredibly shitty situation for the people of El Salvador. Indeed it is. The government just mandated that everyone in the country is obligated to use a startup's app, more or less. This has to be one of the most egregious examples of regulatory capture I've seen in a long time. "Legal tender" means that people are legally obligated to accept this as payment. Maybe the law will be broad enou…
Lightning developer here. I have no idea what their legal definition would be, but lightning is an open standard, and Strike is but one implementation.