Live data from Hacker News

Shameless Work Influencers Are the Bane of LinkedIn

index.medium.com

211–220 of 228 posts

Re: Shameless Work Influencers Are the Bane of LinkedIn

#211
post #146

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I never say anything I really think or feel under my real name which isn't utterly benign and uncontroversial. There is a profound sense of unsafeness when you're in full public view like that. It seems almost unavoidable that the end result is almost entirely watered down blathering. I don't really see any antidote to this in our current environment other than operating as much as possible on platforms allowing pseu…

It's interesting to see some people feel this way. I don't really filter my views in posts on the web compared to conversations with (not very close) friends. It does feel like that could very well come back and bite me, maybe I'll lose jobs over "supporting hacktivism" or whatever. I guess it's a risk I'm willing to take to share my ideals.

Yes, this depends on many factors, like how strongly you feel about the case, how controversial it is, if you have kids, mortgage and so on.

I'll never forget when many years ago my boss, by that time a CEO of some major publicly traded companies, called me to his office and kindly asked I moderate my Usenet activity on some niche group. It turned out he was a lurker there and foresaw certain things I said might cause problems - it turned out he was right. And that was a long time before the Twitter era.

Re: Shameless Work Influencers Are the Bane of LinkedIn

#212

My uBlock Origin filters for linkedin which completely cut feeds and all sort of distracting things out (some filters might be outdated, but things work): www.linkedin.com##.feed-follows-module www.linkedin.com##.ember-view.feed-shared-navigation-module.overflow-hidden.Elevation-2dp.left-rail-container www.linkedin.com##.ember-view.pv3.feed-shared-news-module www.linkedin.com###launchpad-wormhole www.linkedin.com##.r…

I simply unfollowed everyone. My LinkedIn home page is pretty much blank. There's a script somewhere to batch unfollow your contacts.

It worked so well that I did the same with Facebook and Twitter. I don't even like those websites. Visiting them is more like a reflex.

Re: Shameless Work Influencers Are the Bane of LinkedIn

#213

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You can indeed curate, but I definitely get the vibe that cringe is the default mode on LinkedIn (which is still strictly better than Twitter’s default mode, toxicity).

What would a better social media platform look like in your opinion?

I pretty much don’t use unmoderated forums. (he said, on an unmoderated forum) But on any forum, the rotting stench of money draws many flies. That’s a lot of the problem.

BYW, how much do I get for posting this valuable wisdom?

Re: Shameless Work Influencers Are the Bane of LinkedIn

#214

Through LinkedIn I’ve been recruited to three public companies and have done one successful IPO. I don’t read the articles or interact with anyone really. If you ignore the social drama which I don’t personally see a lot of, I think it’s a decent tool given the price.

> I think it’s a decent tool given the price.

What is the price?

Re: Shameless Work Influencers Are the Bane of LinkedIn

#215

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I have solved this problem by unfollowing people who post or like low quality content. My LinkedIn feed is now mostly filled with useful corporate news.

You should a LinkedIn post about that (but seriously great advice)

Could not resist the temptation:

https://www.linkedin.com/posts/ohtis_is-your-linkedin-feed-f...

Re: Shameless Work Influencers Are the Bane of LinkedIn

#216

Do LinkedIn influencers get hired more than the rest of us? The article seems to make that assumption. But if recruiters and hiring managers don’t like this influencer content either, maybe none of this matters and we can all just relax and ignore the LinkedIn newsfeed.

Yeah. LinkedIn tries to encourage this sort of behavior for engagement but I haven’t found my lack of engagement with it to staunch the recruiter outreach. If anything, when on the recruiting side as I review applications I use engagement with that pabulum as an indicator that this person is a BS-artist and probably wouldn’t be a good culture fit for my team. These really attention-seeking personality types tend to s…

> Maybe bigger companies have enough slack in the system and outlets for people to blow off steam to absorb it

They achieve this by wearing avacado costumes https://www.reddit.com/r/LinkedInLunatics/comments/nneex4/fl...

Re: Shameless Work Influencers Are the Bane of LinkedIn

#217

A lot of the comments seem to suggest that good quality content is missing from LinkedIn and other mainstream social media platforms. I wonder what people consider to be good quality content?

I think a lot of people on HN just hate all social media so much that by definition there couldn't be any good content.

I read one good article on LinkedIn Pulse once, and even that was probably copy pasted from Medium

Re: Shameless Work Influencers Are the Bane of LinkedIn

#218
post #62

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>>www.linkedin.com##div[class^="feed-shared-update"] Drop this one. Breaks linkedin for me

That's the main feature. Parent mentionned: > All this leaves out is the leftmost side (where your number of connections are seen), and the top blue row. The feed is entirely gone.

Ah missed that part. Thanks

Not sure why anyone would even access linkedin at all then? Connections count is essentially meaningless

Re: Shameless Work Influencers Are the Bane of LinkedIn

#220

> a vast circle jerk in the cloud Well, that has the ring of truth, when applied to the newsfeed. And the final conclusion that you should just get on linkedin when job searching and then get off again is fine. I find it incredibly useful for job searching, to the point that I don't even bother with other sites. However, the job search experience is badly spoiled by secondary recruitment postings. These are especiall…

Also what's super annoying when doing job searches is that they add this 'promoted' stuff that blatantly ignores your search query. I have some searches set up for jobs in my local Spanish city but every day it adds 'promoted' jobs in the US to it.

I wonder if it is just filling when the number of matching search results are low. I don't recall having memorable problems like that.
Post reply on HN