Live data from Hacker News

1Password for Linux beta

blog.1password.com

211–220 of 254 posts

Re: 1Password for Linux beta

#211
I use keepassxc on Dropbox. It syncs everywhere and if I have doubt about its cryptography, I browse the code, see at least what libraries it’s using, check the forks, read reviews and commentary on the source code, etc.

Maybe 1password offers UI to organizations. But for individuals and small groups, it seems to offer fees and less provable security.

Re: 1Password for Linux beta

#212
post #209

Let me just mention Gopass ( https://gopass.pw ) which is a brilliant terminal-based `pass`-compatible password manager ( https://www.passwordstore.org/ ). Gopass is open-source, free, and based on open standards. Meaning, you can use your keystore practically anywhere. For instance on Android with the Password Store app ( https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=dev.msfjarvis.... )

Can I use Yubikeys on iOS and Android?

The GPG keys are externally held.

Re: 1Password for Linux beta

#215
post #41

In my opinion, it should be a bare minimum for something as important as a password manager to be free software. Others have mentioned Bitwarden and Keepass in this thread, both of which meet that criteria, but personally I'll stick with pass since I don't need a GUI.

Huh, you are saying that something that is so important you want for free, and that the company building this product for you should forgo money and work simply for free? Wouldn't the opposite make far more sense that something that is so important you should pay 'more' for? They are free options that you are welcome to, but for people who want more they pay for it.

Free software doesn't mean for free. It means being able to audit it to see if it has no backdoors.

Re: 1Password for Linux beta

#216

Earlier quoted context omitted.

+1 on 1Password's dedication to fixing issues. I had an obscure field selection issue on their web view and pinged the support email. It was fixed a few days later and they updated me on it. I switched to 1Password from KeePass after 5 or so years because I just got tired of maintaining the data locally and keeping it in sync on my devices that I need the passwords on. I just backup the 1Password database locally now…

I’ve been a happy one-password customer for several years and I switched to the family subscription model to get my parents away from their little notebook of passwords. I had self-hosted a PHP based password manager for a handful of years, before switching to 1P because I wanted a “real app” with tighter OS integration. I’ve had 3 gripes and this solved one of them. The other 2 are 1) Their insistence on 1PasswordX-…

In defence of the notebook of passwords, there tends to be minimal overlap between opportunistic neighbourhood burglars and identity thieves.

Re: 1Password for Linux beta

#217
post #41

In my opinion, it should be a bare minimum for something as important as a password manager to be free software. Others have mentioned Bitwarden and Keepass in this thread, both of which meet that criteria, but personally I'll stick with pass since I don't need a GUI.

For anyone wondering, pass refers to this[1] project.

[1]: https://git.zx2c4.com/password-store/tree/README

Re: 1Password for Linux beta

#218
Lots of people saying they will only use an open source password manager - fair enough, that's your prerogative. But I think it's unfair if everyone just complains that this isn't open source. First people complained that 1Password wasn't on Linux. Then they made a browser extension that works on Linux, and people complained it wasn't native. Then they make a native application, and people complain that it's not open source. That's not their business model, that was never on the table. But it's worth celebrating when Linux is gaining support, even from proprietary companies. It's good that Steam supports Linux even when FreeCiv exists. It's good that Unity supports Linux even when Godot exists. Let's give 1Password some credit for supporting Linux - thanks guys!

Re: 1Password for Linux beta

#219
post #218

Lots of people saying they will only use an open source password manager - fair enough, that's your prerogative. But I think it's unfair if everyone just complains that this isn't open source. First people complained that 1Password wasn't on Linux. Then they made a browser extension that works on Linux, and people complained it wasn't native. Then they make a native application, and people complain that it's not open…

I mean, I agree with the principle of your argument, I'm not really one to care _too_ much about specialised programs like this being closed source, especially if they have well defined migration paths and so on.

However, this has been _years_, 8 or 9 by my quick check on the App Store.

First there was the "agilekeychain" and the python libraries (blimey) to read from it, so I could kinda do my thing on linux, but then it was deprecated and they spent 18months trying to create a CLI variant that on arrival basically never worked.

Then they pushed a subscription model which was rather expensive for the functionality too, and after paying for new versions a few times I felt a bit annoyed, and I still could not access my passwords from Linux anyway..

Then they pushed really hard for their own hosted sync (for new vaults at the very least); And without dropbox I couldn't even sync to linux. I'm not sure if they went back on that.

Eitherway, the problem is not that it isn't open source per-say.

The problem is that it's an incredibly closed ecosystem as it exists today, and an expensive one- maybe you're better off looking at equivalently featured, free, and more open options... of which there are many.

Re: 1Password for Linux beta

#220
post #218

Lots of people saying they will only use an open source password manager - fair enough, that's your prerogative. But I think it's unfair if everyone just complains that this isn't open source. First people complained that 1Password wasn't on Linux. Then they made a browser extension that works on Linux, and people complained it wasn't native. Then they make a native application, and people complain that it's not open…

You're assuming that 'people' in all those example are the same set of individuals.
Post reply on HN