Live data from Hacker News

Facebook Container for Firefox

mozilla.org

211–220 of 446 posts

Re: Facebook Container for Firefox

#211
post #95

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Is the Firefox implementation different from Chrome? I don't think Chrome allows you to default links to specific profiles but I have used this feature in Chrome for a while to separate work and personal profiles to sandbox Chrome instances.

afaik profiles in chrome work for the whole instance (like in firefox) but Container work on a per tab basis

That's exactly right. And Firefox has that profile functionality too.

Re: Facebook Container for Firefox

#212
post #172

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Hi, I did my thesis on browser fingerprinting. Most algorithms that build profiles and look for combinations of features that are unique. The best way to hide your fingerprint is to be as similar to everyone as possible. So that means use as much of the standards as possible that comes with the OS. Do not use anything that would not be considered mainstream (e.g. don't be the only person from Guatemala on Opera, Linu…

Is there anything a user could do to switch a common "corporate laptop" profile, either manually (set this resolution, these fonts, etc) or via an extension. I know about Privacy Badger and they provide some protection but not from all fingerprinting. Their statement about is: https://privacybadger.org/#Does-Privacy-Badger-prevent-finge... --- Privacy Badger can detect canvas based fingerprinting, and will block thir…

Tor Browser is trying to do something like this, even going so far to restrict viewport resolutions to some common multiple, leaving you with black bars for the remaining space.

Re: Facebook Container for Firefox

#213
post #182

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I use it to split my work and my personal GitHub accounts!

> GitHub recommends using only one user account to manage both personal and professional repositories. https://github.community/t/using-one-account-for-all-your-pr...

Of course they do. That doesn't make it a good idea though.

Re: Facebook Container for Firefox

#215

I use Firefox multi-account containers[1] extensively, it's honestly the primary reason I use Firefox these days. The big win for me is that I _hate_ having to use the Google account switcher, so I basically set up a container for each Gmail account (work, personal, old email, etc). The nice bonus feature is you can have certain sites default to containers. I had a paid YouTube account for a while, for example, so ha…

I also love Temporary Containers, so each of my tabs can be a fresh sheet. Also cookies and much else gets purged after I close them.

Re: Facebook Container for Firefox

#216

I use Firefox multi-account containers[1] extensively, it's honestly the primary reason I use Firefox these days. The big win for me is that I _hate_ having to use the Google account switcher, so I basically set up a container for each Gmail account (work, personal, old email, etc). The nice bonus feature is you can have certain sites default to containers. I had a paid YouTube account for a while, for example, so ha…

Would you be willing to share your config?

Last I checked, I'd have to enumerate every Google domain and subdomain, which just seemed like too much work. But if others have already done this, itd be easy to just use theirs.

Re: Facebook Container for Firefox

#217
I use ungoogled chromium but I have a script that completely replaces my .config/chromium/ directory with a clean version saved with no cookies/history or anything else saved. that means I can basically roll back any stuff that I do. to update the config (eg for bookmark adding) I just replace the stored clean version with a new clean version created. I have my workflow integrated with starting on the internet with a "clean slate". yes things take a bit longer being signed out but using a password manager mitigates this somewhat. I have never had a problem with resetting my config and have been using the design for at least 2 years worth of chrome updates (with a few " resets" of my safe config)

Re: Facebook Container for Firefox

#218

How does this stop facebook from tracking you? I'm fairly certain that on facebook, google, everyone, etc tracking is largely through processing request logs to gstatic.com or fbcdn.net for example with a referrer header saying what site you are visiting, your source IP and various other things to fingerprint the request.

> various other things to fingerprint the request Isn't this exactly how it prevents FB from tracking you? Those "various other things" that it uses will all be different between different containers. I think the source IP thing is a valid point, which is why other commenters have pointed out that you can force your FB container to connect through a proxy, while your other containers don't.

Timestamps, IP, and user agent are probably enough to reconstruct the user visit. Chrome is now sending a browser generated fingerprint x-client-data to all Google's domains while of course they will be trying to end use of referer header for everyone else. They are shameless and think people are dumb.

Mobile carriers are injecting their own fingerprint headers into outgoing http requests as well if not using https.

Re: Facebook Container for Firefox

#219
post #121

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Along with the Facebook Container I use multi-account containers to keep a Google, Microsoft, and Amazon container as well. I included all of their children companies in the parent containers (like GitHub in Microsoft, YouTube in Google). It's sobering seeing how much of the internet shows up in one of these four containers.

I use multi-account containers and temporary containers so that all my new tabs are isolated. Is there any reason to also use facebook container if you already have multi-account containers?

> I use multi-account containers and temporary containers so that all my new tabs are isolated

Worth mentioning that with the addon cookie auto-delete, you can more or less emulate temporary containers.

Re: Facebook Container for Firefox

#220
post #61
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What advantages does brave have other than their weird ad replacement thing? I’ve weirdly moved to Microsoft edge from Firefox for something’s recently. Unfortunately the chrome developer tools are awful.

Chromium browser which still generally has a performance edge, but without some types of Google's tracking like the browser level sign in or the recent example of Google exempting themselves from clear cookies.

I use both quite a bit and do not notice any difference in performance. You may be able to tell via benchmarks, but real-world performance is very similar.
Post reply on HN