Live data from Hacker News

Researchers discover new salivary glands in the human head

sciencealert.com

211–215 of 215 posts

Re: Researchers discover new salivary glands in the human head

#211
post #12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I've suspected for some time that medicine is actually closer to the dark ages than we like to think it is What does that even mean? Nobody's claiming that modern medicine is anywhere close to perfect but the "dark ages" medicine was Humorism, blood letting and faith healing. Surgeons didn't start washing their hands before childbirth until the 19th century. It's really weird to look back at the mind-boggling progr…

Oh dear, I should not have to labor the obvious but I will. With all the medical schools, hundreds of thousands of doctors, pathologists, diagnostic tools, xrays, MRIs, etc. etc. that we've had available in the 'modern' era of medicine - in the last 100 or so years - how the fucking hell did we miss something as 'obvious' as this? QED!

Please review the site guidelines and omit swipes from your comments.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

Re: Researchers discover new salivary glands in the human head

#212
post #94

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Oh dear, I should not have to labor the obvious but I will. With all the medical schools, hundreds of thousands of doctors, pathologists, diagnostic tools, xrays, MRIs, etc. etc. that we've had available in the 'modern' era of medicine - in the last 100 or so years - how the fucking hell did we miss something as 'obvious' as this? QED!

Because no one is looking for tissue that secretes saliva (not very interesting medically), coupled with the fact that this requires special PET/CT to find. You are a buffoon.

Personal attacks are not allowed here. Please omit such swipes from your HN comments. Your post would be just fine without that last bit.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

Re: Researchers discover new salivary glands in the human head

#213

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What does that mean? (Zero medical cadaver background, with regard tk the distance of validity between one or the other). Satellites are a lot more powerful (hehe) than our eyes, so my understanding Of your point failed.

Basically both MRI and satellite imagery are forms of remote sensing. You want to have someone on the ground eventually to confirm your findings.

Isnt all sensory work ‘remote’ including our eyes?

I mean this question with genuine curiosity

Re: Researchers discover new salivary glands in the human head

#214

Earlier quoted context omitted.

On top of that, not every one has the same tissues in the same places, or the same tissues at all . Most famous is the palmaris longus muscle in the arm. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palmaris_longus_muscle ~14% of humans lack this muscle. Other deviations range from colorblindness all the way to lack of a cerebellum entirely. Humans are quite variable, even when healthy.

TIL I'm missing a muscle.

Me too. Though I wasn't missing it as such, until now.

Re: Researchers discover new salivary glands in the human head

#215
post #190

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> medicine is actually closer to the dark ages than we like to think it is I'm not sure it's entirely on point, but ever since my mother was almost murdered by medical malpractice, and then learning about exactly how bad (frequent and severe) medical malpractice is, it's extremely hard for me to not see it this way. Somewhere close to 300,000 people die a year from medical malpractice, give or take ~50k! Even adjusti…

This common factoid isn't actually true. The real number is almost certainly less than 10,000 people even with a generous definition, and probably closer to a few hundred annually. Further reading: https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/are-medical-errors-really-t... Takeaway: > (1) [Adverse Effects of Medical Treatment] are not uncommon; (2) the vast majority of AEMTs that occur in patients who die aren’t the primary caus…

Well thank you for giving me a different view, now I'm going to have to dig deeper on this. I would say at first glance I already see some methodological cracks, but thanks for the rabbit hole anyway.
Post reply on HN