Live data from Hacker News

Microsoft Advertisement Inc.

neil.computer

211–212 of 212 posts

Re: Microsoft Advertisement Inc.

#211
post #189
post #124

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I would be okay with it if it was properly anonymized. I'm talking for instance some peer-to-peer mixing scheme, not just a privacy clause by which they swear they won't use the data to identify the particular users. There are technical solutions to privacy-conscious telemetry, but of course the non-trivial cost of implementation, and perhaps more importantly the loss of valuable data for the company means it's almos…

> I would be okay with it if it was properly anonymized. MS might properly anonymize it, CandyCrash as well, then antivirus company also does it properly, but when it's all combined nothing says it won't be properly de-anonymized, specially if the data is sensitive and valuable.

If the telemetry information is only internal to the application (generic UI interactions, no specific IDs or tags), I don't see how combining sources could de-anonymize it.

Re: Microsoft Advertisement Inc.

#212
post #211
post #189

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I would be okay with it if it was properly anonymized. MS might properly anonymize it, CandyCrash as well, then antivirus company also does it properly, but when it's all combined nothing says it won't be properly de-anonymized, specially if the data is sensitive and valuable.

If the telemetry information is only internal to the application (generic UI interactions, no specific IDs or tags), I don't see how combining sources could de-anonymize it.

How many people use Candy Crush and that specific industrial driver software? The pinga come from the same IP at similar times.
Post reply on HN