Earlier quoted context omitted.
There were all sorts of reports that he was a pretty taxing guest as well. Cleaning, hygiene, etc.
As Eric Weinstein put it, "we are standing on shoulders of jerks"[1]. I posted it already here once, but it is such a valuable insight that I think it's worth repeating. 1. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TKeMIWVOnbo&feature=youtu.be...
Ecuador to Expel Assange Within ‘Hours to Days,’ WikiLeaks Says
211–220 of 269 posts
Re: Ecuador to Expel Assange Within ‘Hours to Days,’ WikiLeaks Says
#212Earlier quoted context omitted.
She's not locked up for leaking, she's locked up for flagrant contempt in an active grand jury investigation, one which otherwise poses her no legal jeopardy, since she has both immunity and, for much of the subject matter, double jeopardy protection since she's been tried, convicted, and served her sentence for her involvement.
What about this "perjury trap" thing? https://shadowproof.com/2019/03/21/chelsea-manning-believes-...
That's a thing in the past.
If she has perjured herself she certainly has no legal right not to be punished for it. Immunity agreements come in the form "come clean and tell us all". If she didn't, well, that was a stupid decision.
If she did not perjure herself there is no trap to be laid.
Re: Ecuador to Expel Assange Within ‘Hours to Days,’ WikiLeaks Says
#213Time to send that puppet home to Russia, that's where all of the "freedom fighters" apparently flee to.
Re: Ecuador to Expel Assange Within ‘Hours to Days,’ WikiLeaks Says
#214Earlier quoted context omitted.
Clearly Manning is the most simpathetic of all mistreated 'leakers'. Truly, what does anyone gain by having her locked up?
She's not locked up for leaking, she's locked up for flagrant contempt in an active grand jury investigation, one which otherwise poses her no legal jeopardy, since she has both immunity and, for much of the subject matter, double jeopardy protection since she's been tried, convicted, and served her sentence for her involvement.
The US government shoved her in isolation for years. Even with immunity why should she help them now?
Re: Ecuador to Expel Assange Within ‘Hours to Days,’ WikiLeaks Says
#215> WikiLeaks cited the unidentified person as saying the planned expulsion is a response to the organization’s recent tweet linking to a website that alleged money laundering and corruption during Ecuadorian President Lenin Moreno’s time as United Nations special envoy for the disabled in Geneva. Foreign Minister Jose Valencia said last month that the government was “very surprised” by that and other actions by Assang…
Not to mention all his trouble started when he raped (allegedly) one of his former hosts, who had also put him up for free and was generally a fan until he violated the house rules on hygiene.
Re: Ecuador to Expel Assange Within ‘Hours to Days,’ WikiLeaks Says
#216Earlier quoted context omitted.
Assange has not been on the wikileaks staff for 6 months, reportedly. It’s not even clear whether he has internet access anymore. And obviously, if they had been silent on this matter people would now throw accusations of a convenient coverup.
Well that's interesting. It suggests that whoever controls the Wikileaks twitter account may have intended this to happen. And it's a rather interesting time to be stirring up this particular pot in the UK...
Can you elaborate? I can't think of any reason why this would be more or less interesting than any time since the Swedes dropped the rape case. But i can't say I've been following that closely recently.
Re: Ecuador to Expel Assange Within ‘Hours to Days,’ WikiLeaks Says
#217Earlier quoted context omitted.
Well that's interesting. It suggests that whoever controls the Wikileaks twitter account may have intended this to happen. And it's a rather interesting time to be stirring up this particular pot in the UK...
> And it's a rather interesting time to be stirring up this particular pot in the UK... Can you elaborate? I can't think of any reason why this would be more or less interesting than any time since the Swedes dropped the rape case. But i can't say I've been following that closely recently.
Re: Ecuador to Expel Assange Within ‘Hours to Days,’ WikiLeaks Says
#218Earlier quoted context omitted.
Pretty much the whole Russia angle was a big pile of crap for democrats to save face. In my opinion, this hysteria is a big scandal for parts of the media, US institutions and the democratic party. Not saying that Putin is our friend or that republicans are the better choice in the US (not from there).
What about all the actually guilty? > Special counsel Robert Mueller’s team indicted or got guilty pleas from 34 people and three companies during their lengthy investigation, which is now complete. > That group is composed of six former Trump advisers, 26 Russian nationals, three Russian companies, one California man, and one London-based lawyer. Seven of these people (including five of the six former Trump advisers…
Re: Ecuador to Expel Assange Within ‘Hours to Days,’ WikiLeaks Says
#219> WikiLeaks cited the unidentified person as saying the planned expulsion is a response to the organization’s recent tweet linking to a website that alleged money laundering and corruption during Ecuadorian President Lenin Moreno’s time as United Nations special envoy for the disabled in Geneva. Foreign Minister Jose Valencia said last month that the government was “very surprised” by that and other actions by Assang…
Further, political pressure was put on Ecuador to mess with Assange by the US despite the above and more.
None of this is secret information. "Hacker News" letting this misinfo stand as top comment - I'm no longer surprised but I'm still disgusted.
Re: Ecuador to Expel Assange Within ‘Hours to Days,’ WikiLeaks Says
#220Free Manning, free Assange and free Snowden. These 3 individuals have shown the world the corruption and criminal activity our governments engage in and no matter how hard they try to silence them, eventually the truth will show through.
Did they change anything? Did anything they do matter in the end?