211–220 of 244 posts
This is nice specifically because of the way the author uses `exec`. Without meaning to be patronizing, there must be lots of people reading the thread who don't know what `exec` does, and why it's a neat solution to this problem (or non-problem, whatever your view is); I'd say do look it up if you're interested in programming.
(It's especially pleasing to watch the system calls it generates via strace or dtrace!)
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think that advice got warped/lost in translation: Wasn't the original advice "dont't paste stuff copied from web pages into the CLI"? - Because a bad page could covertly change what is actually copied via JS. That danger doesn't apply when things are copied from the browser chrome (address bar) or other locations. So why would pasting then still be dangerous? I think blindly passing on advices "because $SECURITY" c…
un paragraphe pas si innocent
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Relatable. For years, I aliased mroe to more. Now I alias mroe and more to less. My wife drafts a lot of legal documents, and has a problem with "doe snot". Which unfortunately the spelling checker is perfectly happy with.
There's defintitely room for an advanced spell checker that can say "This is valid, but probably wrong".
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Relatable. For years, I aliased mroe to more. Now I alias mroe and more to less. My wife drafts a lot of legal documents, and has a problem with "doe snot". Which unfortunately the spelling checker is perfectly happy with.
There's defintitely room for an advanced spell checker that can say "This is valid, but probably wrong".
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Relatable. For years, I aliased mroe to more. Now I alias mroe and more to less. My wife drafts a lot of legal documents, and has a problem with "doe snot". Which unfortunately the spelling checker is perfectly happy with.
There's defintitely room for an advanced spell checker that can say "This is valid, but probably wrong".
(That said, if it were me, I’m not sure if I would give up typing doe snot every once in a while.)
>I quite often type git then go away and come back, then type a full git status after it. Does anyone else actually do this besides OP. I've never heard of this problem until now.
I do. And I also write "vim vim thefile.txt" and stuff like that. Finally I've written a small shell function that corrects "gi tpull" to "git pull", because that happens at least once a day.
why type 8 characters 100 times a day, when you can type 1?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Well, cutting is called killing in Emacs...
So why is emodendroket referring to ctrl-w then?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
You're joking but... alias g='git status -sb' alias ga='git add' alias gac='git commit --amend' alias gb='git branch' alias gbb='git checkout -b' alias gbm='git branch --merged' alias gbn='git branch --no-merged' alias gc='git commit -m' alias gcp='git cherry-pick' alias gco='git checkout' alias gd='git diff' alias gdc='git diff --cached' alias gg='git status' alias gl='git log --graph --pretty=format:"%Cred%h%Creset…
Instead of `unfuckgitremote`, why not just use `git push -u`?
