Live data from Hacker News

Why discussions on cyber snooping have been so painful for us

medium.com

201–210 of 222 posts

Re: Why discussions on cyber snooping have been so painful for us

#201
post #160

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I agree with you that many of the things that America has done are gross and contradict "American ideals", but I think you're underselling the power and influence of European nations. Why are they so easily bending to the will of such a belligerent turd?

Because fighting should be the last resort. If you are persevering enough, then diplomacy is enough to resolve most conflicts of interest. Way cheaper and nicer than warfare (and maybe more successful). The "problem" is, it's boring and compromises might come across as bending to the other's will (even though it's not).

I don't think they should wage war, but couldn't they put economic pressure on the US? Revoke the Nobel Peace Prize? Put pressure on the US via the UN?

Re: Why discussions on cyber snooping have been so painful for us

#202
post #41

I went to this expecting to find a slightly puzzled reaction along the lines of, "even given the leaked surveillance, we all know that our own governments are doing similar stuff to us all the time and that we are protected neither by law nor by convention against it". I know that's a bit of an overstatement but it's particularly amusing to see Snowden sheltered by two of the world's most enthusiastic users of survei…

Don't you folks get watched by big brother everywhere you go? Isn't London the CCTV capital of the world?

Re: Why discussions on cyber snooping have been so painful for us

#203

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It would, perhaps, be enlightening to quote the entire sentence from the US Declaration of Independence: We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the c…

I'm pretty sure nkoren's point has just flown over your head. You're talking about the obligations of the US Government. The US Government clearly only has the obligation to secure the rights of its own citizens. nkoren is talking about the rights of the US Government. Just look at the language of the very first clause. All men are guaranteed these rights. It makes no mention of citizenship. That the US Government ha…

nkoren is talking about the rights of the US Government.

No, he is talking about the behavior of the US Government and the behavior of its citizens, and inferring motivating principles from that. Nkoren appears to have concluded that the US and its people have abandoned the founding enlightenment ideals in favor of utter selfishness.

I don't buy the bullshit that the government can only protect my rights by violating the rights of others.

Sorry, but that's just the way life is. Maybe someday we can live in a world without prisons, without police, without armies, and without weapons but until that utopia comes people will infringe the rights of others, and the only way to stop them is return violation. That is not to say that every time a government claims it is acting to protect the rights of its citizens it is actually doing so, or that the violations it commits are justified. Or even worth the monetary cost. Small-minded thinking is not being able to make distinctions between John Yoo, Drone Strikes, and PRISM because you think universal human equality is the only enlightenment ideal that matters.

Re: Why discussions on cyber snooping have been so painful for us

#204
post #186
post #180

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> The idealist's battle against tyranny on one side and anarchy on the other is strewn all across the pages of history. Some idealists lost their way. But the ideals, "Safety and Happiness" – really, the entire Declaration of Independence or the UN Declaration of Human Rights – the ideals don't die. > They are self-evident. Like 3.14159 and 2.71828. sounds, I'm with you on this one, being intrinsically inalienable --…

Did you really just put a Lady Gaga in with SCOTUS? :)

Lady Gaga? Sorry ...beyond my ken.

Re: Why discussions on cyber snooping have been so painful for us

#205

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Some of the Founders more than others. While many of them came from the North, where there were no slaves and slavery was generally unpopular, and some of the others like Washington and Jefferson held slaves but felt bad about it, there was a large enough contingent of Southern politicians who just plain favored slavery and had to be politically negotiated with. If you define "the Founders" as "everyone who attended…

It's also important to remember that this was before the industrial revolution, when almost the entire economy was agricultural, thus the South was far more powerful than the north. The Civil War started right after the industrial revolution ended. By this time, the balance of power was greatly in favor of the North.

It's also worth pointing out that one of the early products of the industrial revolution--the cotton gin--made slavery far more cost-effective. It would have died out by natural economic causes otherwise.

Re: Why discussions on cyber snooping have been so painful for us

#207
post #199

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I addressed your us-versus-them mindset in my reply to Goladus, but I couldn't help but point out how disingenuous this is: Good can triumph over evil, but as even Jesus said, it needs the "cunning of snakes" to succeed. The whole quote is: "I am sending you out like sheep among wolves. Therefore be as shrewd as snakes and as innocent as doves." You conveniently forgot the "innocent as doves" part, obviously because…

You misunderstand my argument. Obviously Jesus says that you should do good. Apparently that was a big part of his shtick. But if you want to actually do good you need to have a pretty fucking clear idea of how the world works. Because, y'know, wolves . It's not that America must act like a criminal gang, it's that it lives in a neighbourhood patrolled by a number of criminal gangs, so even if its ultimate goal is to…

I agree with abraininavat; your perspective is an unfortunate one. Or you're being disingenuous. Roman empire and world peace? The Roman empire a) was at constant war, and b) governed over a tiny sliver of the world. And "keep a few guns in reserve just in case" != more military spending than next 20 countries combined; massive spying on allies, enemies, and citizens alike; etc.

Re: Why discussions on cyber snooping have been so painful for us

#208
post #144

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You are interpreting this precisely backwards. These "Rights" are unalienable. They are not to be given away, they are not to be taken away. Governments exist to secure these rights. To help protect these rights, the government may exist... but only by consent of the people being governed. It may be true that the Russian government does not give these rights to it's citizens, or that these citizens yield these rights…

Backwards or forwards, my interpretation is less an oversimplification than the parent. It may be true that the Russian government does not give these rights to it's citizens, or that these citizens yield these rights to the Russian government. Nevertheless, according to the morals listed in the DoI, the US government is founded on the belief that Russians have these rights, because they are human beings. The distinc…

> it is not the US Government's responsibility to secure them

no-one is asking the USG to secure anything (though it seems happy to jump in and do so when it suits other objectives) - the issue is direct, willful, and secret violation of human rights considered inalienable by the USG itself.

Re: Why discussions on cyber snooping have been so painful for us

#209
post #204
post #186

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Did you really just put a Lady Gaga in with SCOTUS? :)

Lady Gaga? Sorry ...beyond my ken.

JUDUS: Justice Department of the United States

"...But Obama’s Justice Department, like Bush’s, has not been above an opportunistic (and occasionally downright Procrustean) reading of particular statutes to permit whatever it is that the White House wants to do."

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5961518

Re: Why discussions on cyber snooping have been so painful for us

#210
post #78

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So what is your point? That I'm not spending time writing blogs about how broke up I am that foreigners are also being targeted? Ok, I'll go write a blog. Personally I feel America is in a crisis right now, and I'd prefer to focus my energy on fighting something I actually have a legal basis for fighting and might win. We aren't talking morals, we are talking LAW. Do you think that if we lose this in America, that wi…

Law is the codification of morality.

It's the codification of the parts of morality that we bargain & wrestle into a set of rules we decide to enforce.

Not all "morality" turns into law, nor is all law based on morale principals.

Post reply on HN