Live data from Hacker News

Lulu: An App No One Should Accept

compylr.com

201–210 of 356 posts

Re: Lulu: An App No One Should Accept

#201
The comments here are absolutely disgusting. Sure, this service is shallow, and absolutely disrespectful of privacy, etc...

But the amount of faux outrage you're all whipping yourselves into a froth over is really over the top. So much hate and resentment. :(

Oh, and those of you claiming there would be some sort of anti-man frenzy if there was a site targeting similar gossip by men?

It's been done. No outrage. The most prominent example? Facebook.

Re: Lulu: An App No One Should Accept

#202

Oddly, I don't mind this. I'd like a version for guys as well though, mostly to see the rage that would come up from the extreme feminists.

What kind of "extreme feminists" are you talking about, and why would you be glad to "see the rage"? It sounds like you'd like to verify your opinion on feminism by considering the arguments of a fringe minority.

Re: Lulu: An App No One Should Accept

#203
post #152

Earlier quoted context omitted.

As I said to the previous poster, if you have a shred of evidence that "the feminists" consider this app to be acceptable (not just "less bad"), you should share it now. If you don't, then you might want to pause for a few minutes and seriously ask yourself why you said what you did. Because from my experience, opposing a service like this is a core value of feminism. (It may not be seen as a top priority, but that's…

I think you and duaneb have misunderstood my comment. I do not mean that they will say that it is acceptable to them because of the patriarchy, they will say that it is acceptable to society because of the patriarchy. In other words, they will blame the existence and acceptance of this app on the patriarchy and not the individuals who created it and accept it.

Men created and promoted this app, and curious people it is targeted to are going to try it. What is your point?

Re: Lulu: An App No One Should Accept

#204
post #68

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> trivial for any highly skilled security tester to interface this way with your database. It's not if you're not doing dumb stuff.

I suppose so, but this heavily relies on no one in your operation having made a mistake, or that mistake having been caught before it was pushed live. You have to be lucky every time, an attacker only needs to be lucky once .

Above you are essentially saying every application has SQL injection vulnerabilities and any good security guy will find them. This is a very specific and dubious conclusion to draw from the more general principle that there will be some vulnerability, somewhere. SQL injection specifically is quite easy to avoid. With some frameworks it would actually be rather laborious to introduce an SQL injection vulnerability. This is what Alexander is alluding to. This does not imply that applications are easily secured, just that this attack vector isn't what it used to be.

Re: Lulu: An App No One Should Accept

#205
post #201

The comments here are absolutely disgusting. Sure, this service is shallow, and absolutely disrespectful of privacy, etc... But the amount of faux outrage you're all whipping yourselves into a froth over is really over the top. So much hate and resentment. :( Oh, and those of you claiming there would be some sort of anti-man frenzy if there was a site targeting similar gossip by men? It's been done. No outrage. The m…

A scan of the comments, all reasonable commentary, tells me that you're likely a troll.

Re: Lulu: An App No One Should Accept

#206

I'm amazed at the kinds of apps which exist and get exposure. This is stuff which might have been fun in high school, but there are actual adults using this. Not to mention the insane double standard. I'd love to see a man make a similar app for rating women this way. I'm sure there would be news reports and tons of angry feminists flooding the airwaves.

Try being a woman on the Internet — anywhere on the Internet, not this one idiot site — and then talk about insane double-standards.

When every other online interaction involves at least a few men commenting on your fuckability or how much of a 'bitch' you are, or going digging through all of your previous posts or even tracking down your Facebook account so that they can publicly share your body with all of the other men reading, and you have no recourse lest you be labelled an 'angry feminist', you will find that one single Web site where women treat men in a similar fashion does not inspire the same level of passion that it is doing here.

It is a terrible Web site, obviously, but i am envious of the social position that leads to such a complete lack of irony and self-reflection as seen in these comments.

Re: Lulu: An App No One Should Accept

#207

How does this even work? I assume it's a database that you search by name and location but then there's going to be all kinds of collisions. Or does it pull data from social networks? I imagine the signal to noise ratio will just be horrible, bitter ex girlfriends will just spam guys with negative tags even if they aren't true and it's information will just lose all value.

It seems you must login with Facebook, which I assume allows for picking of very specific people. I would expect it to be a lot of negatives, because people usually don't (seem to) gossip as much about positives.

So does that mean you can only rate people who are also on facebook? Another excellent reason to avoid using FB then I guess..

Re: Lulu: An App No One Should Accept

#209

I think some women are going to love this.... until someone builds the site that sits on the other side of the coin.

Yeah, can you imagine? The moment women start getting tagged with things like #DoesntPutOut and #Bitchy, I suspect the conversation would be entirely different.

Re: Lulu: An App No One Should Accept

#210
post #194

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They're here: http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2013/02/07/lulu_app_for... and here: http://jezebel.com/5982867/the-creepy-new-yelp-for-boys-and-... Do you not know how to use google?

Nope, a couple of unpopular blog posts is not something I wanted to see. I could have googled those myself. I was expecting a 'rage' unleashed - with just one question - 'How dare they do this!?' "How dare they do this to Gender 'x'" The same rage you saw previously when this happened to women.

Haha, Slate and Jezebel are unpopular. Nice trolling.

(Oh crap, now I'm feeding the troll now, aren't I?)

Post reply on HN