Live data from Hacker News

EU chief opens door for Canada to become 'associate member'

bbc.com

201–210 of 877 posts

Re: EU chief opens door for Canada to become 'associate member'

#201

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Under the bus again, I might add

That's rich considering it was France and the UK that threw Poland under the bus despite having a signed defense pact. The US just came in to clean up the mess.

If Stewie punched me, It doesn't mean Quagmire didnt.

Re: EU chief opens door for Canada to become 'associate member'

#202

im canadian but this feels performative yes i get it, stick it to the USA. yay patriotism. suddenly thats cool and not problematic for some reason. and im also all for less restrictive coordination between nations. it's all performative in the end. but like, this feels basically like "stick it to trump" and not anything meaningful.

I agree and at the same time I'm all for it.

Almost a decade on and most Canadians don't seem to realize we already have CETA (free trade) with the EU. It's not fully fully ratified but it's there. It's why our grocery stores have been slowly filling with European products we never had before (Yay!)

For example: It's already cheaper for me -- as a consumer -- to import sporting goods (skis, etc) from the EU than it is from the US. (And often less shipping hassle too, oddly).

And yet distributor arrangements often still funnel everything through the US, first as "North American distributor" models. Incurring shipping and sometimes even tariff overhead. (Looking at you Scarpa, North America. You suck.)

Even if all of this is symbolic, it may at least shift perceptions on our side of the Atlantic so Canadian businesses at least start looking to Europe more seriously as both importers and exporters.

People often forget our country was built on an east west shipping and transport axis with the St Lawrence (and later the Pacific) as outflow, to supply Europe (mainly Britain). It was only later that north-south trade became more important economically.

Shipping manufactured goods across the Atlantic to European customers may end up cheaper for them than shipping from China in some circumstances.

I'm maybe also a bit biased, I currently work for a European employer.

Re: EU chief opens door for Canada to become 'associate member'

#203
post #114
post #91

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> The EU needs to be truly Federal to succeed economically. That might create uniform regulations with more uniform regulations and actually make Europe competitive. EU already has uniform regulations, what are you talking about? It's also the third largest economy in the world, as uncompetitive as it is.

No it does not. There's a lot of gold plating happening at the national level that goes beyond EU regulations. It's EU regulations + 27 national regulations in reality. The EU economies are still too different and the population too unwilling to have a truly US-style single market.

You seems to be arguing that a U.S. style single-market would be an improvement.

But for whom, people or companies?

Re: EU chief opens door for Canada to become 'associate member'

#204

I’m not sure this is a good thing for Canada. The EU feels like an incomplete experiment. Not strong enough to actually be a single market. But still able to create additional annoying regulations on top of nation level ones. The EU needs to be truly Federal to succeed economically. That might create uniform regulations with more uniform regulations and actually make Europe competitive.

> The EU needs to be truly Federal to succeed economically. That might create uniform regulations with more uniform regulations and actually make Europe competitive.

I agree, but there are huge barriers to taking this step. You need a common identity to create a nation. Americans have one, so do other large nations. The EU does not.

Re: EU chief opens door for Canada to become 'associate member'

#205
post #66

Earlier quoted context omitted.

only if you're weird and think they dont look lovely?

Why, do you like them? Solar panels are even worse. Here in Poland they're covering entire fields in the countryside, I have no idea why they don't build them on parking lots or on factory roofs.

Yes I have no problems with them looks-wise. They don't build them on parking lots/factory roofs because of efficiency. Good solar panels follow the sun, which isnt really a mechanism practical to setup in a parking lot. maintenance is also a lot easier if you have one field generating a gigawatt of power vs having to service 20 parking lots that generate a gigawatt of power. Also obviously the land itself is cheaper in the countryside. Renewables are operating on relatively thing margins profitability wise, so you really want to make the juice worth the squeeze (the main value being sovereignty from other countries as discussed in the thread)

Re: EU chief opens door for Canada to become 'associate member'

#206

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How is this different from the EEA (Norway/Switzerland/Iceland)?

EEA you have to follow rules but get no say in said rules.

To "join" the EEA both sides/parties of it has to agree, so yes, members do have a say, it's beneficial (and should be) to both parties of the agreements.

Re: EU chief opens door for Canada to become 'associate member'

#207

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How is this different from the EEA (Norway/Switzerland/Iceland)?

EEA you have to follow rules but get no say in said rules.

Will Canada have to follow the rules? Will Canada have a say in the rules?

Re: EU chief opens door for Canada to become 'associate member'

#208
post #196

This would be Canada getting down leveled to the minor leagues. Yes there are a few issues with the US, but Canada is vastly better off playing on the world stage under the wings of the US than it would be as the EU’s “associate member.” The next phase of history is going the be China and the US and then everyone else scrambling for scraps.

US governance has become so unreliable, destructive and inane, with little prospect of reverting back to what is once was, given the US’ internal political and societal landscape, that being under its “wings” now constitutes a major risk for any of its allies. Canada is correct to diversify.

I hear you, but the US is hardly the only country on the planet that’s had a few disruptive elections, including the EU BTW. Making generational decisions over one presidential cycle is rather short sighted.

Re: EU chief opens door for Canada to become 'associate member'

#209
post #80

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You've said a bunch of things that don't really equate to "China already won".

> You've said a bunch of things that don't really equate to "China already won". There is no path for victory for the US, where it remains the world's reserve currency. China will become the world's reserve currency by 2032. You are simply in denial. Everything that I wrote points to China winning.

Reserve currency status entirely depends on whether the issuing authority has the ability to drop a munition (literally or figuratively) on the head of anyone who dares to counterfeit the currency.

China's military and soft influence are improving but until they get that good, USD will remain the reserve.

Because, imagine the scenario where the US simply counterfeits the renminbi. What is China's recourse? Spicy statements by Wang Yi in toothless international forums?

Post reply on HN